rsnext/test/development/acceptance-app/rsc-runtime-errors.test.ts

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

153 lines
4.5 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

import path from 'path'
import { outdent } from 'outdent'
import { FileRef, createNextDescribe } from 'e2e-utils'
import {
check,
getRedboxDescription,
getRedboxSource,
getVersionCheckerText,
hasRedbox,
retry,
} from 'next-test-utils'
createNextDescribe(
'Error overlay - RSC runtime errors',
{
files: new FileRef(path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures', 'rsc-runtime-errors')),
},
({ next }) => {
it('should show runtime errors if invalid client API from node_modules is executed', async () => {
await next.patchFile(
'app/server/page.js',
outdent`
import { callClientApi } from 'client-package'
export default function Page() {
callClientApi()
return 'page'
}
`
)
const browser = await next.browser('/server')
await check(
Add hasRedbox fix (#60522) ## What? As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()` helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true and false case. This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking, this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing that are no longer passing. I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will investigate these next week 👍 Failing tests that are temporarily skipped: - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-2059
2024-01-15 09:36:44 +01:00
async () => ((await hasRedbox(browser)) ? 'success' : 'fail'),
/success/
)
const errorDescription = await getRedboxDescription(browser)
expect(errorDescription).toContain(
`Error: useState only works in Client Components. Add the "use client" directive at the top of the file to use it. Read more: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/react-client-hook-in-server-component`
)
})
it('should show runtime errors if invalid server API from node_modules is executed', async () => {
await next.patchFile(
'app/client/page.js',
outdent`
'use client'
import { callServerApi } from 'server-package'
export default function Page() {
callServerApi()
return 'page'
}
`
)
const browser = await next.browser('/client')
await check(
Add hasRedbox fix (#60522) ## What? As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()` helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true and false case. This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking, this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing that are no longer passing. I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will investigate these next week 👍 Failing tests that are temporarily skipped: - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-2059
2024-01-15 09:36:44 +01:00
async () => ((await hasRedbox(browser)) ? 'success' : 'fail'),
/success/
)
const errorDescription = await getRedboxDescription(browser)
expect(errorDescription).toContain(
'Error: `cookies` was called outside a request scope. Read more: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/next-dynamic-api-wrong-context'
)
})
it('should show source code for jsx errors from server component', async () => {
await next.patchFile(
'app/server/page.js',
outdent`
export default function Page() {
return <div>{alert('warn')}</div>
}
`
)
const browser = await next.browser('/server')
await check(
Add hasRedbox fix (#60522) ## What? As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()` helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true and false case. This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking, this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing that are no longer passing. I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will investigate these next week 👍 Failing tests that are temporarily skipped: - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-2059
2024-01-15 09:36:44 +01:00
async () => ((await hasRedbox(browser)) ? 'success' : 'fail'),
/success/
)
const errorDescription = await getRedboxDescription(browser)
expect(errorDescription).toContain(`Error: alert is not defined`)
})
it('should show the userland code error trace when fetch failed error occurred', async () => {
await next.patchFile(
'app/server/page.js',
outdent`
export default async function Page() {
await fetch('http://locahost:3000/xxxx')
return 'page'
}
`
)
const browser = await next.browser('/server')
await check(
Add hasRedbox fix (#60522) ## What? As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()` helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true and false case. This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking, this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing that are no longer passing. I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will investigate these next week 👍 Failing tests that are temporarily skipped: - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-2059
2024-01-15 09:36:44 +01:00
async () => ((await hasRedbox(browser)) ? 'success' : 'fail'),
/success/
)
const source = await getRedboxSource(browser)
// Can show the original source code
expect(source).toContain('app/server/page.js')
expect(source).toContain(`await fetch('http://locahost:3000/xxxx')`)
})
it('should contain nextjs version check in error overlay', async () => {
await next.patchFile(
'app/server/page.js',
outdent`
export default function Page() {
throw new Error('test')
}
`
)
const browser = await next.browser('/server')
await retry(async () => {
expect(await hasRedbox(browser)).toBe(true)
})
const versionText = await getVersionCheckerText(browser)
await expect(versionText).toMatch(/Next.js \([\w.-]+\)/)
})
it('should not show the bundle layer info in the file trace', async () => {
await next.patchFile(
'app/server/page.js',
outdent`
export default function Page() {
throw new Error('test')
}
`
)
const browser = await next.browser('/server')
await retry(async () => {
expect(await hasRedbox(browser)).toBe(true)
})
const source = await getRedboxSource(browser)
expect(source).toContain('app/server/page.js')
expect(source).not.toContain('//app/server/page.js')
// Does not contain webpack traces in file path
expect(source).not.toMatch(/webpack(-internal:)?\/\//)
})
}
)