archive/rsnext
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
rsnext/test/e2e/app-dir/route-page-manifest-bug/next.config.js

7 lines
96 B
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

Fix manifest error when using route.js (#46102) This ensures there is no client component entry created for route.js. @shuding is going to investigate further why this would break the manifest generation in development. Fixes #45956 Fixes NEXT-588 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: --> ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
2023-02-18 20:31:49 +01:00
/**
* @type {import('next').NextConfig}
*/
Remove experimental config from create-next-app (#49241) ## What? Removes `experimental.appDir` this was leftover from when I flipped the switch. Kept the config file as in the future we might add future flags and such. It also helps that it has the types comment included so you always get types. <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> --------- Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
2023-05-05 09:22:28 +02:00
const nextConfig = {}
Fix manifest error when using route.js (#46102) This ensures there is no client component entry created for route.js. @shuding is going to investigate further why this would break the manifest generation in development. Fixes #45956 Fixes NEXT-588 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: --> ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
2023-02-18 20:31:49 +01:00
module.exports = nextConfig
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink