rsnext/test/e2e/app-dir/error-boundary-navigation/index.test.ts

137 lines
3.5 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

Reset not-found and error boundary when navigating (#49855) ## What? Currently the error boundary state does not reset when a navigation happens because the `key` does not change. Because of that navigating using next/link when the error boundary is in the open state ends up not rendering the contents of the new navigation, instead it keeps the error boundary contents. ## How? This PR uses a pattern that is recommended in the React docs (setState during render) to reset the error boundary if the `usePathname` value has changed, it is used as a proxy for a new navigation. Fixes #47862 Fixes NEXT-963 Fixes #49736 Fixes #49732 Fixes #49599 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-18 22:06:57 +02:00
import { createNextDescribe } from 'e2e-utils'
export function runTest({ next }) {
it('should allow navigation on not-found', async () => {
const browser = await next.browser('/trigger-404')
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#not-found-component').text()).toBe(
'Not Found!'
)
expect(
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
await browser
.elementByCss('#to-result')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#result-page')
.text()
).toBe('Result Page!')
})
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
it('should allow navigation on error', async () => {
const browser = await next.browser('/trigger-error')
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#error-component').text()).toBe(
'Error Happened!'
)
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
expect(
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
await browser
.elementByCss('#to-result')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#result-page')
.text()
).toBe('Result Page!')
})
it('should allow navigation to other routes on route that was initially not-found', async () => {
// Intentionally non-existent route.
const browser = await next.browser('/testabc')
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#not-found-component').text()).toBe(
'Not Found!'
)
expect(
await browser
.elementByCss('#to-result')
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#result-page')
.text()
).toBe('Result Page!')
})
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
it('should allow navigation back to route that was initially not-found', async () => {
// Intentionally non-existent route.
const browser = await next.browser('/testabc')
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#not-found-component').text()).toBe(
'Not Found!'
)
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
await browser
.elementByCss('#to-result')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#result-page')
.back()
.waitForElementByCss('#not-found-component')
})
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
it('should allow navigating to a page calling notfound', async () => {
const browser = await next.browser('/')
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
await browser
.elementByCss('#trigger-404-link')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#not-found-component')
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#not-found-component').text()).toBe(
'Not Found!'
)
await browser.back().waitForElementByCss('#homepage')
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#homepage').text()).toBe('Home')
})
it('should allow navigating to a non-existent page', async () => {
const browser = await next.browser('/')
await browser
.elementByCss('#non-existent-link')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#not-found-component')
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#not-found-component').text()).toBe(
'Not Found!'
)
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
await browser.back().waitForElementByCss('#homepage')
Failing tests for 404 back/forward (#50047) ## What? After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not behaving as expected: - When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being triggered at the same time. - When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found page caused the page to become empty Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both. ## How? - Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it - Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors what we do in `pages`) Fixes NEXT-1209 Fixes NEXT-1218 Fixes #49823 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-22 17:04:36 +02:00
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#homepage').text()).toBe('Home')
})
it('should be able to navigate to other page from root not-found page', async () => {
const browser = await next.browser('/')
await browser
.elementByCss('#go-to-404')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#not-found-component')
await browser
.elementByCss('#go-to-dynamic')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#dynamic')
expect(await browser.elementByCss('#dynamic').text()).toBe(
'Dynamic page: foo'
)
await browser
.elementByCss('#go-to-dynamic-404')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#not-found-component')
await browser
.elementByCss('#go-to-index')
.click()
.waitForElementByCss('#homepage')
})
}
createNextDescribe(
'app dir - not found navigation',
{
files: __dirname,
},
({ next }) => {
runTest({ next })
Reset not-found and error boundary when navigating (#49855) ## What? Currently the error boundary state does not reset when a navigation happens because the `key` does not change. Because of that navigating using next/link when the error boundary is in the open state ends up not rendering the contents of the new navigation, instead it keeps the error boundary contents. ## How? This PR uses a pattern that is recommended in the React docs (setState during render) to reset the error boundary if the `usePathname` value has changed, it is used as a proxy for a new navigation. Fixes #47862 Fixes NEXT-963 Fixes #49736 Fixes #49732 Fixes #49599 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
2023-05-18 22:06:57 +02:00
}
)