Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wyatt Johnson
c6320ed87a
Replace createNextDescribe with nextTestSetup (#64817)
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->

I took some time and [wrote a
codemod](https://gist.github.com/wyattjoh/0d4464427506cb02062a4729ca906b62)
that replaces the old usage of the `createNextDescribe` with the new
`nextTestSetup`. You'll likely have to turn on hiding of whitespace in
order to review, but this should primarily introduce no changes to the
test structure other than using the new mechanism now.

Closes NEXT-3178
2024-04-25 12:06:12 -06:00
Will Binns-Smith
f9aec9005a
Turbopack: Trace edge runtime app render errors through source maps (#62901)
Similar to #62611, this implements error stack translation for edge
runtime app render errors.

Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/app-render-error-log/app-render-error-log.test.ts`

Closes PACK-2665
2024-03-05 20:40:26 -08:00
Will Binns-Smith
be87132327
Turbopack: Trace server app render errors through source maps (#62611)
Previously, errors shown in the error overlay, these stir were left
untraced through source maps.

Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/app-render-error-log/app-render-error-log.test.ts`

Closes PACK-2608
2024-03-01 16:31:02 -08:00
Tim Neutkens
25a9547cad
Remove experimental config from create-next-app (#49241)
## What?

Removes `experimental.appDir` this was leftover from when I flipped the
switch.

Kept the config file as in the future we might add future flags and
such. It also helps that it has the types comment included so you always
get types.

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md



## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->

---------

Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
2023-05-05 00:22:28 -07:00
Shu Ding
b5f7f84485
Refactor require hooks (#48506)
Same purpose as #48297, but without the React channel branching logic to
make it easier to land. Since we have #48478 reverted, we only need to
consider `pages` and `app` inside the require hook.

> This PR aims to improve the current require hook by implementing two
key changes. Firstly, it ensures that the initialization occurs at the
top of the module level for correctness. Secondly, we now set the
NEXT_PREBUNDLED_REACT environment variable at the process level to
ensure that we don't mix the two types of rendering processes and we
always resolve the correct React package.
>
> These improvements are made possible by the changes introduced in PR
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/47857.
> 
> Closes [NEXT-231](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-231).

This will likely fix #45258 too.

---------

Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
2023-04-22 00:19:51 +02:00
JJ Kasper
fdacca8abc
Add initial separated route resolving (#47208)
This updates to have a separate routing process and separate rendering
processes for `pages` and `app` so that we can properly isolate the two
since they rely on different react versions.

Besides allowing the above mentioned isolation this also helps us
control recovering from process crashes easier as pieces are more
isolated from one another e.g. an infinite loop during rendering will no
longer block the compiler and can be stopped/restarted as needed.

In follow-up PRs we will continue to separate out the routing logic from
the rendering logic so that each process only loads what is relevant to
it helping simplify the flow for requests regardless of type.

---------

Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-02 15:17:15 +02:00
Hannes Bornö
b3f3bf59b9
Improve app-render error log with edge runtime (#46157)
`app-render` server errors aren't logged correctly with the edge runtime. This adds logging of a filtered stack trace.

Before
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25056922/220144922-06aba048-0166-4114-8421-8f61e6137d5e.png)

After
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25056922/220145019-83c1cf80-d6c7-4ce0-b76f-201265c7fafb.png)

Still some improvements left to figure out. This change doesn't log the original stack frame, and the `Log.error` is not printed with a red text like it should be.

Fixes NEXT-593

## Bug

- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)

## Feature

- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)

## Documentation / Examples

- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
2023-02-20 16:24:15 +00:00
Hannes Bornö
1127df4d6a
Make app-render error logging less verbose in dev (#45472)
Make the app-render error less verbose in dev. Reuse
`logErrorWithOriginalStack` from the dev server but hide frames from
`node_modules`, `next/dist/compiled` and `node:internal` if we're in the
app directory. Also removes `webpack-internal` from the frame file name.

<details>
<summary>Before</summary>


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25056922/215798020-9aea3401-95dd-4f09-9e4c-26d822c0ce38.png)
</details>

<details>
<summary>After, with source</summary>


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25056922/216609074-66039be9-f599-47af-8c5d-b64a6be503ab.png)
</details>

<details>
<summary>After, no source</summary>


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25056922/216608526-46ada990-7e6f-4c9e-b1d3-347ebb03f6fa.png)
</details>

<details>
<summary>For comparison, from `pages/`</summary>


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25056922/216610761-dd87e5e6-1e9c-4b41-8adf-650cf15464e3.png)
</details>

Fixes NEXT-441

## Bug

- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)

## Feature

- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)

## Documentation / Examples

- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)

---------
2023-02-14 18:46:30 -08:00