archive/rsnext

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Sebastian Silbermann	fe8d953e2d	Replace `hasRedbox()` (#67025 ) ...with `assertHasRedbox` and `assertNoRedbox`. `hasRedbox()` has a hardcoded timeout of 5s that is only required for the negative assertion. Instead, we now have dedicated assertions for the positive (`assertHasRedbox`) and negative case (`assertNoRedbox`). The negative assertion still has the hardcoded timeout. But the positive assertion just retries until we find the Redbox. This speeds up tests using the positive assertion. Removing `hasRedbox` also uncovered some unused expressions e.g. `await hasRedbox(browser)`. These expressions probably wanted to use `expect(await hasRedbox(browser)).toBe(true)	2024-06-20 10:37:32 +02:00
Wyatt Johnson	c6320ed87a	Replace createNextDescribe with nextTestSetup (#64817 ) <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> I took some time and [wrote a codemod](https://gist.github.com/wyattjoh/0d4464427506cb02062a4729ca906b62) that replaces the old usage of the `createNextDescribe` with the new `nextTestSetup`. You'll likely have to turn on hiding of whitespace in order to review, but this should primarily introduce no changes to the test structure other than using the new mechanism now. Closes NEXT-3178	2024-04-25 12:06:12 -06:00
Jiachi Liu	92e4a4b78c	Associate server error digest with browser logged one (#61592 ) ### What #### Core This PR respect the error's digest when recieves new error occurred from server side, and it will be logged into client on production with the same `digest` property. If we discover the original RSC error in SSR error handler, retrieve the original error #### Tests * Move the errors related tests from `test/e2e/app-dir/app` to a separate test suite `test/e2e/app-dir/errors` * Add a new test case for logging the original RSC error * Add a new test case for logging the original Server Action error ### Why This will help associate the `digest` property of the errors logged from client with the actual generated server errors. Previously they're different as we might re-compute the digest proper in handler that react server renderer thinks it's a new error, which causes we have 2 different errors logged on server side, and 1 logged on client side. The one on client side can associate to the server errors but it's from react renderer which is not the original error. Closes NEXT-2094 Fixes #60684	2024-02-06 13:39:12 +01:00

Sebastian Silbermann

fe8d953e2d

Replace hasRedbox() (#67025 )

...with `assertHasRedbox` and `assertNoRedbox`.

`hasRedbox()` has a hardcoded timeout of 5s that is only required for
the negative assertion.
Instead, we now have dedicated assertions for the positive
(`assertHasRedbox`) and negative case (`assertNoRedbox`).
The negative assertion still has the hardcoded timeout.
But the positive assertion just retries until we find the Redbox.

This speeds up tests using the positive assertion.
Removing `hasRedbox` also uncovered some unused expressions e.g. `await
hasRedbox(browser)`.
These expressions probably wanted to use `expect(await
hasRedbox(browser)).toBe(true)

2024-06-20 10:37:32 +02:00

Wyatt Johnson

c6320ed87a

Replace createNextDescribe with nextTestSetup (#64817 )

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->

I took some time and [wrote a
codemod](https://gist.github.com/wyattjoh/0d4464427506cb02062a4729ca906b62)
that replaces the old usage of the `createNextDescribe` with the new
`nextTestSetup`. You'll likely have to turn on hiding of whitespace in
order to review, but this should primarily introduce no changes to the
test structure other than using the new mechanism now.

Closes NEXT-3178

2024-04-25 12:06:12 -06:00

Jiachi Liu

92e4a4b78c

Associate server error digest with browser logged one (#61592 )

### What

#### Core
This PR respect the error's digest when recieves new error occurred from
server side, and it will be logged into client on production with the
same `digest` property.
If we discover the original RSC error in SSR error handler, retrieve the
original error

#### Tests

* Move the errors related tests from `test/e2e/app-dir/app` to a
separate test suite `test/e2e/app-dir/errors`
* Add a new test case for logging the original RSC error
* Add a new test case for logging the original Server Action error


### Why

This will help associate the `digest` property of the errors logged from
client with the actual generated server errors. Previously they're
different as we might re-compute the digest proper in handler that react
server renderer thinks it's a new error, which causes we have 2
different errors logged on server side, and 1 logged on client side. The
one on client side can associate to the server errors but it's from
react renderer which is not the original error.

Closes NEXT-2094
Fixes #60684

2024-02-06 13:39:12 +01:00

3 commits