We already have a warning when using `next export` with `output: export` because the `next export` is effectively a no-op (the exported output was already generated during `next build`).
However, this PR ensures that `next export -o <dir>` throws an error when `output: export` is defined because the files were already emitted to the `distDir` in the `next build` step and we can't safely no-op at this point.
We also guide the user to the correct solution which is to use `output: export` along with `distDir: <dir>` in your next.config.js (instead of mixing legacy behavior with the new behavior).
fix#48207
fix NEXT-980
Follow up for #50548
There're some packages like `aws-sdk-js-v3` which doesn't have a exports field yet:
```
"main": "./dist-cjs/index.js",
"types": "./dist-types/index.d.ts",
"module": "./dist-es/index.js",
```
This PR let u pick up by the js assets based on main fields, will prefer `"module"` field instead of `"main"`
Closes NEXT-1286
Add a `NEXT_CPU_PROF` environment variable to programmatically profile CPU for the router worker and two render workers. This is helpful because the `--cpu-prof` isn't reliably writing the result (#27406) especially with our multi-process architecture.
Adding a `_rsc` query for RSC payload requests so that they can be
differentiated on resources level for CDN cache for the ones that didn't
fully respect to VARY header.
Also stripped them for node/edge servers so that they won't show up in
the url
x-ref:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/49140#issuecomment-1549405009Closes#49140
Closes NEXT-1268
This is a temporary fix before we can ship #51018 (more details there). If there're multiple chunk groups holding the same CSS module, we use files from the first one. This has some flaws but still better than our current status.
Like how we handled RSC loader transform before, we also apply swc
loader to middleware to make sure the imports optimization is applied so
og package won't be bundled
Fixes#50492
### What?
When `verbatimModuleSyntax: true` is set, `isolatedModules: true` are not allowed by TS
### Why?
Next always adds `isolatedModules: true` which causes TS error.
### How?
- Fixes#46509
fix NEXT-689
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
There are some incoming docs / MDX changes where prettier will throw an error when using the older version. Updating prettier before I bring in those changes.
Looks like the most notable change is adding parentheses around `typeof` checks in TypeScript.
**Before**
```
export type Locale = typeof i18n['locales'][number]
```
**After**
```
export type Locale = (typeof i18n)['locales'][number]
```
We need to spread the module into an object instead of access the module exports that could not exist, to avoid triggering the warning. Fix the bad loader change introduced in #50548
```
Attempted import error: './middleware.js' does not contain a default export (imported as '
mod').
- info Using locally built binary of @next/swc
- warn You are using an experimental edge runtime, the API might change.
- wait compiling...
- warn ../../../../packages/next/dist/build/webpack/loaders/next-middleware-loader.js?abso
lutePagePath=%2FUsers%2Fhuozhi%2Fworkspace%2Fnext.js%2Ftest%2Fe2e%2Fapp-dir%2Fapp%2Fmiddle
ware.js&page=%2Fmiddleware&rootDir=%2FUsers%2Fhuozhi%2Fworkspace%2Fnext.js%2Ftest%2Fe2e%2F
app-dir%2Fapp&matchers=!
Attempted import error: './middleware.js' does not contain a default export (imported as '
mod').
- wait compiling...
```
Manifests tend to be really big and our strategy is to inline them in the edge function script itself and we're hitting some constraints this way.
This PR switches this behaviour via inlining the script and creating a JS object at runtime instead, with the hope that the parsing time will be faster as JSON.parse is very well optimised in V8.
The end goal ofc is to have smaller manifests but this should be a good stopgap.
link NEXT-1273
Encode the state tree where the content could contain unicode when
request the RSC payload, to avoid the fetch failure due to bad encoding
for headers
Fixes#48728
fix NEXT-1258
After enabling Draft Mode, `router.refresh()` was incorrectly causing the page to crash and do a full page refresh.
This PR fixes this case.
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
To resolve issue #49382, we found layer doesn't get applied for dynamic imports, so we fixed it on webpack side in https://github.com/webpack/webpack/pull/17310
This PR is to upgrade webpack to 5.86.0 with that patch as a precedence. After this we need to fix the `next/image` client components is missing in client reference manifest when using dynamic imports to fix the issue.
This is an optimization to make the plugin faster, we're currently doing
redundant work `getAppPathRequiredChunks()` for all modules during
`recordModule()` while it's not changing.
For RSC server layer so far we bundle all dependencies, ESM format is the better one rather than CJS to analyze and tree-shake out the unused parts. This PR changes pick the condition names that are in ESM format first for server layer.
Also fixes the misorder of condition names of edge runtime, `conditionNames` should only contain either ESM or CJS, previously the main fields are mixed with conditon names which is not expected for webpack, we separate them now.
Since we're picking ESM instead CJS now, the error of require `exports * from` doesn't exist anymore, but if you're using a CJS dependency which require a ESM package, it will error. This is the existing behavior for our webpack configuration but could happen on server layer bundling
Other related changes:
* Imports are hoisted in ESM, so migrate`enhanceGlobals` to a imported module
* Use `...` to pick the proper imports by import expression, and prefer the `react-server` / `edge-light` condition names for corresponding cases
* Remove edge SSR duplicated `middleware` export checking
This makes sure that if `revalidateTag` is called in a Server Action, the client router cache and prefetch cache are invalidated correctly so following navigations won't reuse the cache that might hold stale data.
Similar case for `revalidatePath`. I left a TODO where we can't just invalidate the subtree under the revalidate paths because of current implementation limitations. To ensure correctness, we just do the same as `revalidateTag`.
The `ssrModuleMapping`/`edgeSSRModuleMapping` fields store information
for the Flight client that does SSR to resolve the correct modules in
the SSR bundle. This works as a module ID mapping between the client
bundle and the SSR bundle. During the mapping, we can drop the `chunks`
field because we don't actually have external chunks to load during SSR
as everything is locally `require`'d.
This reduces the client manifest size by at least 20%.
Move as much of codeowners as possible to use Vercel Spaces.
1. Makes `@timneutkens @ijjk @shuding @huozhi @feedthejim` global owners
2. Make the `@vercel/next-js` team _optional_ owners of **/docs**,
**/errors**, and **/contributing**, makes team owners of a few packages
as per old config.
3. Make `@vercel/devex` (docs and devrel) owners of **/docs**,
**/errors**, and **/contributing**
4. Make `@vercel/devrel` (devrel only) owners of **/examples**
5. Make `@vercel/web-tooling` owners of specific files and folders (as
per old config)
Leaves @styfle as owner of **image** files on the old config since this
pattern `/**/*image*/** ` can't be used with Vercel Spaces.
Note: We cannot add * or / at the end of files.
[Docs](https://spaces-docs.vercel.sh/docs/code-owners#:~:text=Code%20Owners%20files%20are%20meant%20to%20encourage%20distributed%20ownership%20definitions%20across%20a%20codebase.)
When twitter metadata is not provided but opengraph metadata is, fill the opengraph basic information for twitter metadata.
Twitter card can't be displayed if there's no information from twitter meta tags, at least the `twitter:card`. We fill the `title` `description` and `images` these 3 overlapped properties from opengraph image so they can be displayed properly
Closes NEXT-1111
Hello,
We removed some core non-necessary dependencies that make Edge Runtime
smaller 🙂.
Also, Edge Runtime is exposing `WebSocket`, so nothing additional should
be done.
Closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/50760
---------
Co-authored-by: Wyatt Johnson <accounts+github@wyattjoh.ca>
This starts the process of moving the rendering logic for pages into the
bundle. The `render` method on the module now provides the same
capability as the underlying `renderHTML` method available on the
`NextNodeServer`. In the next few change sets, more layers of the
rendering pipeline will shift into the bundled code, removing them from
the main boot path.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## What?
Anytime you open a Next.js application that doesn't have a `favicon.ico`
you'll notice `/_error` is being compiled because the browser requests
`favicon.ico`. This PR ensures the 404 page is not compiled in
development for that request. It helps a little with compilation speed.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Follow up for #50678 as @gnoff commented in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/50678#pullrequestreview-1457858336
Now metadata is shorter with the shorter key with just numbers
```
self.__next_f.push([1,"5:[[\"$\",\"meta\",\"0\",{\"charSet\":\"utf-8\"}],[\"$\",\"meta\",\"1\",{\"name\":\"viewport\",\"content\":\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1\"}]]\n"])
```
Updates to not throw the dynamic server error inside of the patched
fetch as it's typical for fetch errors to be caught and handled and this
error is not meant to be caught by users. This instead throws it during
rendering so we can ensure we catch it instead of users.
x-ref:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5182384027/jobs/9339123096
## What?
While investigating slow compilation for a page on vercel.com in
development I found that there was close to 10 seconds of time
unaccounted for in `.next/trace`. Ran a profile and found that time was
spent in watchpack `batch`, specifically calling `close` many times.
When I tried to debug this further by running unbundled webpack I
noticed the same issue didn't exists.
### Before
<img width="1329" alt="Before"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/6324199/9ace4628-db04-4de7-993f-65aef9dffc55">
### After
<img width="1278" alt="After"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/6324199/55d5e58b-4a27-4235-8dea-723a7a78c117">
## Raw numbers
<table>
<tr>
<td>Before</td>
<td>After</td>
<td>Delta</td>
<td>Delta (percent)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13840 ms</td>
<td>3580 ms</td>
<td>-10260 ms</td>
<td>-74.13%</td>
</tr>
</table>
## How?
Investigated further and found that specifically not minifying watchpack
solved the issue.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
## What?
We recently implemented an optimized resolving method for `app` in Turbopack, this ports some of the main changes in that resolving logic to optimize `next-app-loader` which during compilation resolves the tree structure that we use to render in `app-render.tsx`.
Here's the results for a page that is nested a few levels deep on vercel.com using App Router. These results only cover `next-app-loader`, not any modules compiled below it.
### Before
<img width="671" alt="CleanShot 2023-06-03 at 22 36 26@2x" src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/6324199/0edeb060-2460-4a7d-95a7-1c22ea26a065">
### After
<img width="673" alt="CleanShot 2023-06-03 at 22 55 10@2x" src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/6324199/f40964fc-b169-4d95-8711-73cbff3ec76a">
## Raw numbers
<table>
<tr>
<td>Before</td>
<td>After</td>
<td>Delta</td>
<td>Delta (percent)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.620 ms</td>
<td>76.39 ms</td>
<td>-1.543.61 ms</td>
<td>-95.2%</td>
</tr>
</table>
## How?
Changed the resolving logic to use `fileExists`, looping over the provided pageExtensions.
For Turbopack we have a process that does only one pass for generating all trees. That also only reads directories instead of checking individual files, which is even better (<5ms for generating all possible trees) but this PR is a quick win that has a big impact already without refactoring the entire entries generation in webpack.
### What
Currently when all the metadata rendered as JSX as server components, all the empty metadata which should be skipped as they're rendered as `null` in JSX, are still included in the RSC payload. This helps reduce the initial html size.
### How
Change the JSX components into function calls, and filter out the nullable component that won't be rendered, then they won't show up in the react tree and be serialized.
Before
```
self.__next_f.push([1, "5:[[[\"$\",\"meta\",null,{\"charSet\":\"utf-8\"}],null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,[\"$\",\"meta\",null,{\"name\":\"viewport\",\"content\":\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1\"}],null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,[]],[null,null,null,null],null,null,[null,null,null,null,null],null,null,null,null,null]\n"])
```
After
```
self.__next_f.push([1, "5:[[[\"$\",\"meta\",\"charset\",{\"charSet\":\"utf-8\"}],[\"$\",\"meta\",\"viewport:width=device-width, initial-scale=1\",{\"name\":\"viewport\",\"content\":\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1\"}]]]\n"])
```
Closes NEXT-1232
This field is no longer needed. Although removing it might cause
unnecessary styles being included that could be tree-shaken potentially,
it solves a more critical issue of missing CSS resources: since now CSS
import can be "hoisted" to its parent entry (e.g. a layout), we can't
simply get all used CSS resources from the "leaf entry" (e.g. a page).
I noticed while testing that we're getting a bunch of 500 errors after #50241 merged. Turns out that `fetchNextData` will [fetch `HEAD` requests](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/cf9591cd/packages/next/src/shared/lib/router/router.ts#L619-L621) for background priority. The problem is that, somewhere, the Next router is draining the body from HEAD responses, leading us to trying to `JSON.parse` an empty string.
This changes the way we return results to the Turbopack router. Instead of `JSON.stringify`ing the result into the body (which will be drained by something), we directly return the result. And it saves us a `stringify` -> `parse` -> `stringify` round trip, so that's nice.
I took the chance to clean up some of our boilerplate code, too.
Bumping `@edge-runtime/*` <picture data-single-emoji=":edge-runtime:" title=":edge-runtime:"><img class="emoji" width="20" height="auto" src="https://emoji.slack-edge.com/T0CAQ00TU/edge-runtime/b940e917443aa49f.png" alt=":edge-runtime:" align="absmiddle"></picture> packages to their latest beta, as we had some huge improvements and big changes on how it works internally.
* Using the latest `undici` which provides a WebSocket implementation
* Less polyfill usage as we load modules in the Node.js realm, and can reuse modules from Node.js as time goes on <picture data-single-emoji=":just-right2:" title=":just-right2:"><img class="emoji" width="20" height="auto" src="https://emoji.slack-edge.com/T0CAQ00TU/just-right2/588cf34d02f4b3bd.png" alt=":just-right2:" align="absmiddle"></picture>
* `instanceof` checks now work within the realm <picture data-single-emoji=":mind_blown:" title=":mind_blown:"><img class="emoji" width="20" height="auto" src="https://emoji.slack-edge.com/T0CAQ00TU/mind_blown/0186b6f181040126.gif" alt=":mind_blown:" align="absmiddle"></picture>
This PR fixes a couple of categories of CSS issues in App Router, that
come from the same root cause.
### 1. Duplicated styles being loaded in different layers
This issue has been described in
https://github.com/vanilla-extract-css/vanilla-extract/issues/1088#issuecomment-1563931144.
If a CSS module (or a global CSS) is referenced in multiple layers (e.g.
a layout and a page), it will be bundled into multiple CSS assets
because each layer is considered as a separate entry.
<img width="1141" alt="CleanShot-2023-05-26-GoB9Rhcs@2x"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/3676859/8e0f5346-ee64-4553-950a-7fb44f769efc">
As explained in that issue, we have to bundle all CSS modules into one
chunk to avoid a big number of requests.
### 2. CSS ordering issues (conflicts)
This is likely causing https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/48120.
When the layer-based bundling and ordering logic applies to CSS, it can
potentially cause non-deterministic order. In this example, button A in
the layout should be in blue. However when button B is imported by the
page, button A becomes red. This is an inconsistent experience and can
be hard to debug and fix.
<img width="1090" alt="CleanShot-2023-05-26-Ar4MN5rP@2x"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/3676859/4328d5d7-23af-4c42-bedf-30f8f062d96a">
## What?
Currently we use the initial compile to add entrypoints that we know are
going to be used in the application. For example the Next.js runtime,
`react`, `react-dom`, and such. While this was the right default when
Next.js only had `pages`, it's no longer true when both `pages` and
`app` exist. E.g. when you're working on a page using App Router we'd
still compile `pages/_app`, `pages/_document`, and `pages/_error` even
though those would not be used. In case of larger applications (e.g.
Vercel's application) this would mean thousands of extra modules being
compiled even though you don't need them for the page you're looking at.
Similarly we'd compile the Next.js runtime for App Router even when
you're only using `pages`.
This PR changes the handling to only compile the entries that are needed
for the current set of visited pages (on-demand-entries). If that set
only includes `app` entrypoints then the `pages` related files will be
excluded. If the set contains both `app` and `pages` both will be
included. Similarly for `amp`, if you don't use `amp: true` / `amp:
hybrid` the development runtime will not be compiled.
📔 Note: This is specifically for webpack, Turbopack already compiles
everything needed lazily so it didn't have this limitation.
#### Before
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 1079 ms (306 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 155 ms (306 modules)
```
With opening `/`:
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 1118 ms (306 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 157 ms (306 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 599 ms (486 modules)
```
Total: 1.874ms (Note: This number is much higher when `pages/_app`
imports many modules).
#### After
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 118 ms (20 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 65 ms (20 modules)
```
📔 Note: opening the page then causes the Next.js / React runtime to be
compiled ofcourse
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 115 ms (20 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 57 ms (20 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 1137 ms (361 modules)
```
Total: 1.309ms (Note: This number is not affected by`pages/_app`
importing many modules).
## How?
We can only apply this optimization after we've looped over the list of
on-demand entries, as that has the required metadata. Hence why I went
with deleting the keys for each respective type of entrypoint (`pages`,
`app`, `amp`).
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Problem
Relative hash/query handling in `next/link` (e.g. `<Link
href="#hello">`) is broken in App Router, especially if you're on a
nested route.
This wasn't a problem in `/pages` because the href always get fully
resolved in `<NextLink>`; i.e. if you have `<Link href="#hash" />` on
`/hello`, it'll resolve the href to `/hello#hash` and use that
everywhere.
However, in App Router, `<Link>` no longer uses the current location to
resolve the href:
5451564f36/packages/next/src/client/link.tsx (L450-L457)
Therefore navigating with `new URL(href, location.origin)` will skip the
current path and always apply the relative hash/query to the _root_
route:
5451564f36/packages/next/src/client/components/app-router.tsx (L208-L215)
## Solution
Not 100% sure if this is the best solution, but since `app-router` is
already reading `window.location`, I'm using `location.href` as the base
URL to resolve the href.
I grep'd for `location.origin` and checked other callsites; seems like
only `app-router` deals with user specified hrefs.
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42157 &
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/44139, and potentially
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/48554 and
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/22838
## Test Plan
```
pnpm testheadless test/e2e/app-dir/navigation
```
---------
This adds new `build and test` and `build and deploy` workflows in favor
of the existing massive `build, test, and deploy` workflow. Since the
new workflows will use `pull_request_target` this waits to remove the
existing workflow until the new one is tested.
While testing this new workflow flakey behavior in tests have also been
addressed. Along with the new workflow we will also be leveraging new
runners which allow us to run tests against the production binary of
`next-swc` so this avoids slight differences in tests we've seen due to
running against the dev binary.
Furthermore we will have a new flow for allowing workflow runs on PRs
from external forks which will either require a comment be checking a
box approving the run after each change or a label added by the team.
The new flow also no longer relies on `actions/cache` or similar which
have proven to be pretty unreliable.
Tests runs with the new workflow can be seen here
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5100673508/jobs/9169416949
To prevent confusion with`IncomingHttpHeaders`, this renames the functions used to convert back and forth between `OutgoingHttpHeaders` and `Headers`:
- Rename `fromNodeHeaders` to `fromNodeOutgoingHttpHeaders`
- Rename `toNodeHeaders` to `toNodeOutgoingHttpHeaders`
This exports the named exports from the user's page route file and
exports a new `routeModule` stub. This stub will be the new rendering
mechanism used for pages within `pages/` and will serve to allow us to
deprecate large chunks of the server code to instead live within the
pages entrypoints.
TLDR;
- Route Modules now accept a `definition` so that they have their full
route definition
- Exports are now hoisted from the userland module by name to prevent
name collisions
- A new `PagesRouteModule` stub was added that will in the future
contain all the pages rendering logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
## What?
Ensures the name of the chunk is not the same between two modules in different layers.
E.g. if you import 'button-library' in App Router and Pages Router we don't want these to be bundled in the same chunk as they're never used on the same page.
## How?
Added the layer to the chunk name hash generation in splitChunks. Ensures the two modules don't have the same chunk name generated, as discussed with @sokra.
Follow-up to #50324
Since the static metadata routes should always be static that can be
optimized, they should be marked as default runtime (or basically no
runtime). This PR change the runtime detection, if it's a static
metadata route file, its runtime will be erased.
So that it won't be picked up by `edge-app-route-loader` and then by
`next-image-loader` which emits the unexpected static file
Fixes NEXT-1238
If using Server Actions on the client layer without enabling the
`serverActions` feature, the build should error. Add a test case to
ensure #50199 works.
This change allows the Turbopack's node router to serve
`_next/static/development/_devMiddlewareManifest.json` file, which is
just the matchers for middleware routes. This is usually handled by the
node dev server anyways, but we were filtering out the route so that
Turbopack could handle it.
But, Turbopack doesn't implement the route matching logic at all, it's
all handled by our node router. So Turbopack can't know what the
middleware matchers are. Having the router just handle this like the
normal dev server is both easy and efficient (I don't want to spin up
_another_ node instance just to transform the matchers into the expected
format).
Fixes WEB-979
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
A previous
[PR](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/49110#discussion_r1183282878)
tried to reuse `rawNextConfig.experimental.outputFileTracingRoot` before
invoking Turbopack, but that will always be undefined because
`assignDefaults` hasn't been called yet. This creates a shared utility
to be reused.
Fixes next start listening as it currently behaves in-consistently
between dev and start, this shouldn't break any existing behavior as the
default is to listen on all interfaces and if it needs to be locked down
it still can be.
x-ref:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5065560220/jobs/9094296465
Since there is no longer a limitation that requires us to static analyze
`process.env`, this PR removes it from the build process and updates the
corresponding documentation.
### What?
This reverts commit 6ebc725fe6 / #50247.
### Why?
#49972 is reverted due to bugs, and I'm retrying it.
### How?
Closes WEB-1072
Closes WEB-1097
Closes NEXT-1156 (as it's reopened by the revert PR)
fix#48469
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/48019 ensures we
don't use arbitrary ports by incrementing favoring always getting a
fresh free port instead. Also favors exact address for internal IPC
requests instead of `localhost`.
### What?
Implement a CJS optimizer for next-swc
### Why?
x-ref: https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02HY34AKME/p1684341093462309
Assuming most CJS files are transpiled from ESM, we can mimic
tree-shaking using an AST transform.
### How?
Closes WEB-1072
Fixes#48469
fix NEXT-1156
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
## Bug
This fix closes#47083 issue
This fix closes#47561 issue
This fix closes#48376 issue
**Invalid repetition PRs:** #47671 (this PR changing expired code)
(This issue still exist on
[v13.4.3-canary.1](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v13.4.3-canary.1)
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
### What?
When running `NODE_OPTIONS='--inspect' next dev`,
the render server didn't start with `--inspect`.
In some cases,
the `--inspect` flag will be passed when `__NEXT_DISABLE_MEMORY_WATCHER`
was set.
### Why?
Since #47208 revamped some startup processes, the `NODE_OPTIONS`
environment parameter is not passed down to the render server worker.
### How?
Just add back the original startup process.
link NEXT-1176
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
fixes#49783
### What?
Added the following packages to the server component exclusion list
which prevents these packages from going through the currently default
compile pipeline for apps that use the App Router. Packages added are:
"@blockfrost/blockfrost-js", "@jpg-store/lucid-cardano" and "mongoose".
(For instance, mongo was already in this exclusion list)
### Why?
These packages are required by the
"@emurgo/cardano-serialization-lib-nodejs" packages and break when not
added to this list while using the app router.
### How?
I've added these packages to the server-external-packages json file in
the Next.js package's lib directory.
Fix react and react-dom aliases are not properly set for `pages/`
* Remove alias react-dom internals to `{}` in edge runtime as we're using server rendering stub as alias
* Add `react$`, `react-dom$` missing aliases
* Only apply alias to builtin react/react-dom when it's app dir assets.
* Add `react|react-dom/package.json` resolving to require-hook
* Fix hmr issue that sometimes it will perform a reload when a hard navigation is triggered
This `draftMode` prop was missing from the previous PR:
- https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/48669
It was added on `GetStaticPropsContext` but not on
`GetServerSidePropsContext` so this PR fixes it.
---------
Currently the edge runtime does not support static generation so this adds a warning when `force-static` is leveraged with `edge-runtime` as it will cause unexpected behavior. Support is being investigated so this isn't a hard error at the moment.
x-ref: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1684783403551589)
## What?
After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not
behaving as expected:
- When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the
error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being
triggered at the same time.
- When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found
page caused the page to become empty
Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both.
## How?
- Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all
levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it
- Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser
navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors
what we do in `pages`)
Fixes NEXT-1209
Fixes NEXT-1218
Fixes#49823
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This removes `node-sass` from being explicitly marked as a peer
dependency as it's not recommended anymore and `sass` is already marked
as a `peerDependency`, further when auto-install peer dependencies is
enabled it can cause this to be pulled in unexpectedly
client refs are not correctly extracted as we're using regex to get the exports names from cjs file. The regex was extracting some bad names from the code source, this PR fixes the regex to make sure they extract the correct content
Fixes NEXT-1213
As explained in the comments, the `cookies()` API is a mix of request and response cookies. For `.get()` methods, we want to return the request cookie if it exists. For mutative methods like `.set()`, we return the response cookie type instead.
fix#50049
fix NEXT-1211
Currently the suffix logic is for pages so nothing happens in app dir. This PR changes it to **always** apply the `createSuffixStream(closeTag)` transform, to defer `</body></html>` to the end of the stream.
fix#48372
fix NEXT-1200
* Adding default metadata to root not found under root layout
* Refactor the tests a bit, previously it only checks if the text existed in html, it actually exisits in flight response
Fixes#49979
Closes NEXT-1207
This serves to create the loader that will allow us to transition more
of the rendering logic into each of the bundled entrypoints. This only
applies to pages routes inside the `pages/` folder in the node
environment.
fix NEXT-985
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## What?
@steven-tey noticed that on upstash.com that scrolling to hash keeps
happening regardless of the hash being set:
- Open site
- Click `Pricing` which adds `#pricing` and scrolls to the
`id="pricing"`
- Click `About`
- Click on the logo
You'll notice that navigating back to the homepage ends up scrolling to
the `id="pricing` instead of to the top of the page.
## How?
This happened because we didn't reset the `hashFragment` and
`segmentPaths` for scrolling when scroll was applied, which means it
would keep that value in the state and would be applied as such on
navigation.
This PR ensures that besides setting `apply` to `false` we also reset
the `hashFragment` and `segmentPaths`.
Fixes NEXT-1205
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR fixes a warning that previous looked like the following:
```
Warning: fetch for [object Request] specified "cache: default" and "revalidate: 60", only one should be specified.
```
## What?
Currently the error boundary state does not reset when a navigation
happens because the `key` does not change. Because of that navigating
using next/link when the error boundary is in the open state ends up not
rendering the contents of the new navigation, instead it keeps the error
boundary contents.
## How?
This PR uses a pattern that is recommended in the React docs (setState
during render) to reset the error boundary if the `usePathname` value
has changed, it is used as a proxy for a new navigation.
Fixes#47862
Fixes NEXT-963
Fixes#49736Fixes#49732Fixes#49599
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Since a server is always required for Server Actions, they won't work
with static exports at all.
fix NEXT-634
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
If running Next.js in the custom server with both app and pages directories presented, a standalone server needs to serve all traffic and the server running in main thread should be a no-op. (cc @ijjk).
Fixes the problem described here: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/49355#issuecomment-1537536063.
`@vercel/og` should also be treated as external package as precompiled one (x-ref: #48844)
As it's ESModule, it could escalate the importee modules to become ESM as well, then `require()` won't be able to load the proper module, we need to switch to await the require result (just like **dynamic import**) for node module loader
[slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1683577269970609?thread_ts=1683569728.697039&cid=C03KAR5DCKC)
metadataBase is using `process.env.PORT` to construct a host when there's no `metadataBase` specified in layout. Dev server needs to pass down the PORT env from the parent prcoess.
Fixes#49807Fixes#49859Closes#49889
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Adds `@swc/core` to the default external server packages for use in
packages within node_modules. This package is useful for generating
documentation and is related to #48739. Ideally, this would be respected
by the `serverComponentsExternalPackages` options.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#49259. Note that even if we allow `.set` in the types, it will still error when called in wrong places (such as Server Components).
fix NEXT-1090
This simplifies the implementation for the client router filter and
makes the error rate configuring more accurate. Additional tests haven't
been added as this is still a matter of probability and existing tests
cover the client router behavior.
Example scenario of filter size/false positives with an error rate of
`0.01%`:
```sh
entries: 128 filter size: 4986 bytes, gzip size: 627 bytes
false positives with 100000 samples: 26 0.026%
```
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04K237UHCP/p1683129488543039)
Now that the beta docs have been merged into stable with the release of
13.4, this updates all links as some paths have changed due to
redirects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### Fixing a bug
Fixes#49536Fixes#49338
### What?
Starting on next.js 13.4.0, the `server.js` file created by the
standalone output is incorrect because it does not wait until the Next
handler is ready before node http server starts accepting requests.
Initial requests will produce the following error:
```
TypeError: handler is not a function
at Server.<anonymous> (/tmp/app/server.js:29:11)
at Server.emit (node:events:513:28)
at parserOnIncoming (node:_http_server:998:12)
at HTTPParser.parserOnHeadersComplete (node:_http_common:128:17)
```
### Why?
The creation of the next server takes roughly 800ms on a basic hello
world app which causes the initial requests to fail because the
`handler` variable is not initialized.
### Solution
This changes the order of code so that Next Server is initialized before
the Node HTTP server and awaits until the promise is completed to kick
off the HTTP server.
### Alternative code
```js
let handler;
const server = http.createServer(async (req, res) => {
try {
await waitUntilHandlerIsReady(); // <---- wait here
await handler(req, res);
} catch (err) {
console.error("Failed to call handler", err);
res.statusCode = 500;
res.end("Internal Server Error");
}
});
async function waitUntilHandlerIsReady() {
if (!handler) {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 200));
await waitUntilHandlerIsReady();
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR changes `useParams` to return all dynamic params present in the
tree as opposed to only those on the canonical/URL path
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
link NEXT-1108
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/49628 this updates
the `export const fetchCache` handling and `cache: 'no-store'` handling
as discussed which also aligns with our docs here
https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/file-conventions/route-segment-config#fetchcache
- `export const fetchCache = 'force-cache'`: forces all fetches to be
cached regardless of `cache: 'no-store'` but cacheable `revalidate`
values still take priority
- `export const fetchCache = 'default-cache'`: ensures fetches are
cached even if they come after a `cache: 'no-store'` fetch but don't
override `cache: 'no-store'` itself.
- without `export const fetchCache`, we still disable fetch cache for
successive fetches after a fetch that does `cache: 'no-store'`
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1683732826894469)
Pretty edge case-y but this PR fixes the case where a fetch error happens for an action and we want to handle at the action handler level.
link NEXT-1123
Modifying an object passed from external sources can unintentionally
lead to unpredictable behavior.
By changing the implementation from in-place object modification to
returning a new object, we can make the method more predictable.
fixes#49501
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
link NEXT-1121
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
The `pathname` in app-render was actually "page" (e.g. `/blog/[slug]`),
with special url conventions. Instead we should use actual request url
as pathname. Rename previous `pathname` arg to `pagePath` for better
readability
Also improved the url validation
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
#### What
Part 1 for WEB-848.
This PR implements initial path to enable relay compiler option in
Turbopack. PR is based on approach WEB-955, that passing custom plugin
transform itself instead of trying to pass down configuration into
turbopack. In result, this PR requires counterpart turbopack PR at
https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/4721.
PR also refactors next-shared's transform bit, as we have grown number
of custom transforms.
Unfortunately there are some runtime errors with this transforms, so it
is not possible to use relay actually yet. WEB-956 tracks this.
(https://github.com/swc-project/plugins/pull/179)
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
In Hot Reloader we use `mod.resource.replace(/\\/g, '/').includes(key)`
to see if the module is the entry. However that `includes` check isn't
solid. Say the entry key is `app/path/page`, these will all be matched:
```
app/path/page.js
app/path/page.css
app/unrelated/app/path/page/another/page.js
```
This PR fixes that and added a test case. I'm unsure if this fixes the
newly reported cases in #43396.
fix NEXT-1110
Fixes: #43598
This was a tricky one to find! Not sure why more people aren't
complaining about this issue, was super annoying in my use case since
links had the wrong URL.
## What?
This issue only occurred when basepath was defined and middleware and
dynamic pages are being used.
Example from the reproduction repo mentioned in the issue tagged:
<img width="686" alt="Screenshot 2023-04-23 at 9 32 55 PM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11258286/233850968-e14f6b49-858b-410e-b8f9-93c90447090a.png">
## Why?
`nextConfig` wasn't passed to `getNextPathnameInfo` function, hence the
basePath wasn't removed from a intermediate variable and that trickled
down to cause this issue.
Added test case based on the issue reproduction repo
---------
Co-authored-by: Jimmy Lai <laijimmy0@gmail.com>
This ensures we use the proper body stream when rewriting to an external
resource as currently it tries to consume an already read body stream.
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/48040
This ensures we properly strip conflicting headers from being forwarded
when handling the redirect request/response in actions.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C042LHPJ1NX/p1683218335368759)
Fixes:
```sh
failed to get redirect response TypeError: fetch failed
at Object.fetch (node:internal/deps/undici/undici:11413:11) {
cause: RequestContentLengthMismatchError: Request body length does not match content-length header
at write (node:internal/deps/undici/undici:9907:41)
at _resume (node:internal/deps/undici/undici:9885:33)
at resume (node:internal/deps/undici/undici:9787:7)
at connect (node:internal/deps/undici/undici:9776:7) {
code: 'UND_ERR_REQ_CONTENT_LENGTH_MISMATCH'
}
}
```
