Not all systems have `/bin/bash` (for example NixOS).
`/usr/bin/env bash` reads the location of bash from `PATH`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
* Add ci script to check examples
* Install moreutils for `sponge` command.
It's not very pretty, but I'm not sure how to replace sponge in a good way in the shell script
* Prettier names in the workflow
* Move "check-examples" into build_test_deploy workflow
* Start breaking the jq script into multiple lines
* Add checks for cleanups in vercel/next.js#27121
* Run the `check-examples.sh` script to cleanup all remaining examples.
* Add licences to all example/package.json that lack them
* Revert "Add licences to all example/package.json that lack them"
This reverts commit 5d4e25012f7334772b8ef5924bc355277e827cba.
* Update check-examples to remove `license` field from examples
* Remove `license` from all examples.
This was mentioned in vercel/next.js#27121 but it looks like it didn't end up being in the merge?
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Only copy .gitignores to examples that are actual packages.
`custom-server` is just a `.md` redirecting users to the documentation.
* Add .gitignores to examples that lack them
Hello! I was using `npx create-next-app --ts` to quickly bootstrap a basic next.js project with Typescript. It bothered me that I got git diff just from running `npm run build` inside the project, because the new notice in the `next-env.d.ts` file.
So I went ahead and updated the `next-env.d.ts` file in [`packages/create-next-app/templates/typescript`](fb67ce9864/packages/create-next-app/templates/typescript/next-env.d.ts) to be exactly how the file looks after running once. (7417ecc09c)
Then I realized that I could probably do the same for all the `next-env.d.ts` that are spread out in the many examples, to make running those examples after cloning them feel a bit smoother. (fb67ce9864)
> However I skipped the [`with-typescript-graphql`](40f85f6d95/examples/with-typescript-graphql) example since that [`next-env.d.ts`](40f85f6d95/examples/with-typescript-graphql/next-env.d.ts (L4-L9)) actually has changes and I couldn't even run `yarn build` in that example, so I'm not sure what will happen with the `next-env.d.ts`. Someone who _gets_ that example will have to fix it I suppose.
Update the `check-exampels.sh` script to also ensure all examples has `private: true` (763d9979f7)
Update exampels (1) that did not have `private: true` (bcdc4a3ae0)
