In Windows absolute paths start with things like `C:\` instead of `/`.
This PR closes#42024 as I confirmed the reproduction app is working
properly with this fix.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR fixes the bug reported by @hanneslund (reproduction:
https://github.com/hanneslund/css-mod-import-test).
There can be multiple modules with the same resource, some of them can
be created via plugins (extracted by the mini-css plugin) and some can
be directly transformed via loaders (e.g. the CSS modules loader). In
these cases, we need to merge the resources generated by all of them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
* Import dev overlay for dev mode only
* Remove other unused code
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Bundle the ssr client layer for RSC, this solves the problem when
there's an esm package is using on client components, but esm imports
the installed react instead of the built-in react version since esm
imports is not intercepted by require hook.
After bundling the ssr client layer and treating react as externals, now
react compiles as cjs externals and could be intercepted by require
hook, other code are bundled together which can also get optimized.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR implements the process of generating strict "type guard" files,
to ensure that all entrypoints have the correct export types. The type
checking process happens automatically during `next build`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Fixes tree shaking for font loaders in server components.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
The way we currently track server CSS imports is to collect CSS files that each **module** depends on. This happens on the module graph level which is a global thing and cannot be tree-shaken properly (check the enabled test for more details).
In this PR we collect another information, of CSS files that each **entrypoint** depends on. This is the CSS list after tree-shaken on the entry level. By intersecting these CSS imports with the module-level CSS imports, we can get the final used CSS imports for each _layout_.
cc @hanneslund
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Currently, we use the `isClient ? 'deterministic' : 'named'` condition
for module IDs. We did that because in the context of server compiler,
the server graph (RSC) can directly know the module ID of the referenced
module in the client graph (SSR). The client module's ID _is_ the module
reference module's resource path. However, that makes the server bundle
and the manifest file larger because these module IDs cannot be
minified.
In this PR we are changing it to `deterministic`, with another mapping
for server SSR.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Re-do of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40251
Edge SSR'd routes cold boot performances are proportional to the
executed code size.
In order to improve it, we are trying to optimize for the bundle size of
a packed Edge SSR route.
This PR adds ESM compilation targets for all Next.js dist packages and
use them to bundle Edge SSR'd route.
This allows us to leverage the better tree shaking/DCE for ESM modules
in webpack in order to decrease the overall bundle size.
This PR also enables minifying Edge SSR routes. Since we don't control
which minifier might be used later (if any), it's best if we provide an
already optimised bundle.
<img width="903" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/190005211-b7cb2c58-a56a-44b0-8ee4-fd3f603e41bd.png">
This is a 10ms cold boot win per my benchmarking script, which I'll put
in a subsequent PR.
Not done yet:
- ~~swap exported requires in `next/link` (and others) etc to point them
to the esm modules version~~
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. In order
to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for
the change that you're making: -->
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
This reverts commit 11deaaa82b.
Temporarily reverts the above commit due to breaking middleware/edge
functions once deployed.
Fixes:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3133433920/jobs/5087331787
cc @shuding @feedthejim
```sh
[GET] /blog/first
13:56:56:61
2022-09-27T20:56:56.671Z 61d43a6a-34a1-40c0-b71f-4ae5d1918431 ERROR /var/task/node_modules/next/dist/esm/client/router.js:1
/* global window */ import React from 'react';
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module
at Object.compileFunction (node:vm:352:18)
at wrapSafe (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1033:15)
at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1069:27)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1159:10)
at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:981:32)
at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:822:12)
at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1005:19)
at require (node:internal/modules/cjs/helpers:102:18)
at Object.<anonymous> (/var/task/node_modules/next/router.js:3:7)
at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1105:14)
```
Makes sure font loader CSS ends up correctly in the Flight Manifest and Flight Client Entries.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
# Context
Edge SSR'd routes cold boot performances are proportional to the
executed code size.
In order to improve it, we are trying to optimize for the bundle size of
a packed Edge SSR route.
This PR adds ESM compilation targets for all Next.js dist packages and
use them to bundle Edge SSR'd route.
This allows us to leverage the better tree shaking/DCE for ESM modules
in webpack in order to decrease the overall bundle size.
This PR also enables minifying Edge SSR routes. Since we don't control
which minifier might be used later (if any), it's best if we provide an
already optimised bundle.
<img width="903" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/190005211-b7cb2c58-a56a-44b0-8ee4-fd3f603e41bd.png">
This is a 10ms cold boot win per my benchmarking script, which I'll put
in a subsequent PR.
Not done yet:
- ~~swap exported requires in `next/link` (and others) etc to point them
to the esm modules version~~
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
### Issue
When import an esm package in client component, and use it in server
component page, it will fail to SSR but render successfully on client.
It's because the import to esm package will make the client chunk become
an **async module** since esm module will be treated as **async**.
```
page (serve component) -> local module (client) -> external dependency (esm)
```
Then in react SSR layer, it need the module type information of that
chunk, async or not for react so that react could unwrap the async
module from `Promise` properly when SSR.
### Solution
We need to mark the client entries which are effected by async/esm
modules that becoming **async** as `async: true` in SSR manifest.
Since flight manifest plugin is only running against client compiler,
which doesn't have those module information from server compiler. So we
collect the async modules from the **server** compiler **client** layer
from flight entry client plugin, then leverage the collection to detect
if a module is async in flight manifest plugin for react.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
If there's any resolve alias in webpack config, an aliased resource url will error with `require.resolve` usage in flight manifest plugin, we need to resolve the absolute resource url first then pass down to flight manifest
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
Change server components convention from using `.server.js` / `.client.js` file extension to determine it's a server or client component to using `'client'` js literal as a directive for determine client components boundary.
React RFC: https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/189
New behavior doesn't consume `.server.js` as server components any more, if you're enabling `serverComponents` flag, every `page.js` in app dir will become server components by default. If you adding a `'client'` directive to the page, then that page will become a client component. This rule also applies to the normal js components, client components will require a `'client'` directive to indicate its identity, instead of having a `.client.js` extension.
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
When a client module is imported by both a module from an `app` entry and a module from `pages` entry, it is possible that it is included in the `pages` chunk eventually. The current check makes the manifest incomplete in that case.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Follow-up to #39758, this PR makes sure that CSS imports (both global and CSS modules) from client components are not handled by mini-css-extract's HMR logic. Instead, we trigger a server component update and let the client to refetch the RSC payload.
However, we are still leveraging the mini-css-extract plugin to emit CSS assets. So in this PR we add a new pitch loader to calculate the original file hash, but replace the final content to eliminate HMR logic but only keep the hash (so hot reloader can keep tracking that).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Continuation of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38817 this adds handling to allow leveraging the `experimental-edge` runtime for `app`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
Removed the hack of client-side CSS injection via `chunk`. Instead collect them with the manifest plugin and SSR them as link tags.
Next step is to adjust HMR to not relying on mini-css-extract plugin and webpack.
WIP.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
Cleans up both Flight plugins and leverages type inference more.
- Rename plugin
- Update name
- Remove note on webpack5
- Add types for Flight manifest
- Use webpack5 type and tapPromise
- Remove any
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
In certain cases, mini-css-extractor will create independent `CSSModule` to the module graph, which doesn't have a user request or resource. Hence we can't match them in the flight manifest plugin like before. This PR adds a work around to use `mod.type` and `mod._identifier` to get such CSS assets.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Improve CSS modules support in server components.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
* Enable css in server components
* inject server css into flight
* refactor and fix test
* fix lint
* resolve css from module deps
* fix dev & prod inconsistentce, collect client css
* simplify
* dedupe duplicated css chunks
* remove ssr link injection and css flight
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Client components might result in a page chunk or a standalone splitted chunk marked in flight manifest, this PR filters out the page chunk for standalone chunk so that while loading a client chunk (like for `next/link`) it won't load the page chunk to break the hydration. `chunk.ids` is not enough for getting required chunks, so we get the chunks from chunk group then filter the required ones.
tests: Re-enable few previous rsc tests
chore: refactor few webpack api usage
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Continue the work in #38310, this PR includes CSS files as chunks in the manifest for each client component, and then make sure the flight client loads the CSS files correctly.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
The `chunkFilenameMap` should take priority over the webpack built-in one here.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Adopt the new `moduleMap` option added in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/24629, which helps us getting rid of our hacky implementation injected to `globalThis.__next_require__`. The map will be attached to the flight manifest as `__ssr_module_mapping__`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Another strategy to do achieve the goal of #36995. With this PR the module IDs will be:
- (1) RSC: named (_this one doesn't matter_)
- (2) SSR: named
- (3) Client: deterministic
And we include the client module IDs in the flight manifest, as well as an extra mapping of 3) → 2) so during SSR it can require the correct module still.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Follow-up PR for #37134, this PR adds back the hash in each chunk's filename. This `chunks` in the flight manifest will now be `chunkId:chunkFilename` with this PR, and `globalThis.__next_chunk_load__` then handles the chunk registration (uses chunkId) and chunk loading (uses chunkFilename). (Q: how can we port this to React?)
We can't use `[contenthash]` but only `[chunkhash]` because at the stage of generating the flight manifest, the content isn't finalized and the hash changes after that.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR makes sure that chunks of client components can be loaded via `__webpack_chunk_load__`, and hydrated correctly inside `viewsDir`.
Side note: we have to get rid of `[contenthash]` from the chunk filename because of a conflict currently which can be resolved later.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
We added custom _app as server component support in #33149, but we found it's pretty confusing on usage like support it both server component pages and regular pages at the same time for having similar layout purpose.
When using the _app.server and _app at the same time, applying them into proper places become more confusing.
In that case, we decide to make _app.js can't be a server component, and you can still keep all the existing thing there. And also you don't need to think of the corresponding APIs of custom _app in RSC
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Docs updated
* move FlightManifestPlugin to server compilers
* revert loader condition
* fix module id
* fix test and refactor
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR fixes a bunch of bugs and it now supports:
- Importing a client component from a nested server component (a.server → b.server → c.client).
- The `export from` syntax in server component (`export { default } from './a.server'`)
- Native modules in server components (currently broken)
## Buga
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR adds the support of the `export * from './foo'` syntax in client components.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
x-ref: #33149
RFCs:
- #30996
- #31506
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Partially implements #31317 and #31506. There're also some trade-offs made with this PR: since we can't know if a certain runtime will be used or not beforehand, we have to start both runtime compilers (Node.js and Edge) and then generate entrypoints correspondingly.
Note that with this PR, the global runtime is still required to use the per-page runtime.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
