Currently, to get all the chunk files that contain a specific module in a build, we use `chunk.files`. However a module itself can be included by multiple chunks, or even chunks from different entries. Theoretically that's correct but in our architecture, we only need these chunks that are from the entry that is currently rendering.
One solution is to add a 2-level key (the entry name) to modules in flight manifest, but that introduces too much size overhead to the manifest. So instead we leverage the `__entry_css_files__` field to generate a list of all files for a specific entry, and then find the intersection set of `{CSSFilesForEntry, CSSFilesForModule}` to get the corresponding CSS files for a specific Next.js entry.
Also renamed `__entry_css__` to be more specific, and did some performance optimizations.
NEXT-297
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Feature
NEXT-54
When there's an error in the one of the root level pages, there's no way to handle it. The team discussed this and decided there should be a global error boundary to pick up anything not handled further down in the tree. It can be called `global-error.js`.
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
The json schema was incorrectly warning because `port: ''` is valid and we document and use it in examples. The empty string is different than undefined
- empty string: match only URLs without a port
- undefined: match URLs with any port
I noticed this when running one of our examples:
```
pnpm next dev examples/image-component
ready - started server on 0.0.0.0:3000, url: http://localhost:3000
warn - Invalid next.config.js options detected:
- The value at .images.remotePatterns[0].port must be 1 character or more but it was 0 characters.
See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/invalid-next-config
```
Add default head to app dir, when there's no`head.js`, use the default
head with the following meta tags
```html
<meta charSet="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
```
It will be replaced if there's custom head.js in child layout.
NEXT-169
arrow function was trying to use arguments binding but wanted arguments
of the lambda not the nearest normal function. The narrowest change is
to convert to function expression. We could also use varargs rest syntax
since this runs in runtimes that should all support that I think. I
don't think it really matters though.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
## Context
There has been [some reports ](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42514)of OOMs-related crashes with Next 13. Whilst we're fixing the memory leaks that are causing this, some of which are caused by upstream issues, this PR makes Next.js' dev server restarts if it detects that it is gonna crash soon.
You can disable this behaviour by passing `__NEXT_DISABLE_MEMORY_WATCHER=1` to the env process.
## Details
Under the hood, we're using Node's cluster API to create a child worker that will basically watch the memory usage after every request and then kill itself if it goes over 90% of the maximum heap allowance.
## Test plan
I added manually a leaking function that I called before handling a request. I then manually tested that the server re-started when we were near the limit.
```
function createMemoryLeak() {
console.log('createMemoryLeak', process.memoryUsage().heapUsed / 1024 / 1024)
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
buffer.push(new Array(1000000).fill('a'))
}
}
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR doesn't change any behavior, its just refactoring.
- renamed `webpack/loaders/next-image-loader.js` to `.ts`
- moved duplicate code into shared function `optimizeImage()`
- support `height` as optional param
- convert `extension` to `contentType`
This PR fixes two memory leaks I found debugging with @sokra.
## 1) Leak in `next-server.ts`
The first leak was caused by the fact that the `require.cache` associated to the `next-server` module was not being cleared up properly, so we leaked context from modules required in that page, like API routes.
## 2) Leak with React Fetch
When evaluating a route, we also evaluated the `react.shared-subset.development.js` module where React patches the `fetch` function. The problem is that when re-evaluating a route as part of hot reloading, we were patching over the previously patched `fetch` function.
The result of this operation meant that we were keeping a reference to the context of the previous `fetch` and thus to the previous route context, thus creating a memory leak, since we only needed the new context.
## Test plan
Checked manually the heap snapshots of a test app.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
As @timneutkens pointed out [here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/43819#discussion_r1042408158), changing the key will make Flight's module cache grow indefinitely. While I've thought about updating Flight's logic to clean the cache at some point, but that's tricky to do correctly as everything is asynchronous and we have to trigger clean up from outside (Webpack).
So currently, a better way I can think of is to just give Flight a proxied object as `moduleExports`. Even if Flight is getting the same object from cache, it will always require the latest module from Webpack.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
### Summary
Migrate `next/dynamic` to implementation based on `React.lazy` and
`Suspense`. Then it becomes easier to migrate the existing code in pages
to layouts. Then we can support both `ssr` and `loading` option for
`next/dynamic`.
For `loading` option, it will work like `Suspense`'s `fallback` property
```js
<Suspense fallback={loading}>
<DynamicComponent />
</Suspense>
```
For `ssr` option, by default `React.lazy` supports SSR, but we'll
disable the `ssr: false` case for dynamic import in server components
since there's no client side involved.
Then we don't need `suspense` option anymore as react >= 18 is always
required. Mark it as deprecated.
It also supports to load client component dynamically in server
components now.
#### Code code changes
* switch loadable component to `lazy` + `Suspense`
* will make sure it's retuning a module from `loader()` to
`loader().then(mod => ({ default: mod.default || mod }))` since `lazy()`
only accepts loader returning a module
* Inside suspense boundary, throwing an error for ssr: false, catch the
error on server and client side and ignore it.
* Ignore options like ssr: false for server components since they're on
server, doesn't make sense
* Remove legacy dynamic related transform
#### Feature changes
* `next/dynamic` will work in the same way across the board (appDir and
pages)
* For the throwing error, will make it become a API that throws error
later in the future, so users can customize more with `Suspense`
* You can load client components now in server components with dynamic.
Resolves#43147
#### Tests
* existing dynamic tests all work
* add case: import client component and load through next/dynamic in
server components
### Issues
Previously we were assuming that `serverOnlyChanges` is the same as
"server component changes". However that's not always true, as one can
change a component from server component to client component, or vice
versa, where the change affects both server and client builds, so
`serverOnlyChanges` will be empty.
This PR fixes the logic by strictly hashing and comparing modules in the
server layer. Note that I intentionally skipped the test as this fix
[isn't
complete](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1670343453333079).
NEX-30
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Reverts vercel/next.js#43597
The tests were disabled and currently the checking of these components
are not reliable, it also breaks the hmr. Revert it for now and then
we'll revisit how to re-enable the required tags checking
### Update
We removed the `<head>` element checking for root layout in #41621. Since we also need `<head>` for preload in the future, and also css-in-js will require that. We're adding back the `head` element checking to make sure user always provide valid root layout including it.
### Issue
An issue was reported [here](https://github.com/mui/material-ui/issues/34905#issuecomment-1331945868) that the Emotion/MUI site was suffering from FOUC.
After an inspection, I noticed that the SSRed HTML didn't contain the inserted styles at all - despite them being inserted through `useServerInsertedHTML`. I managed to debug it down and discovered that their layout was missing `<head></head>` and thus the stream transformer skipped the insertion altogether cause of this check:
fbc98abab3/packages/next/server/node-web-streams-helper.ts (L177-L183)
I've figured that at the very least we could surface this as a console error in development to nudge the user to fix the missing `<head/>`
cc @huozhi
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Use `WellKnownErrorsPlugin` when formatting `@next/font` errors.
The error handling is different for expected errors (like validation
errors) and unknown ones. If the error is expected it just displays the
formatted error message. If it's an unknown error it will also display
the stacktrace, and in case the versions of `@next/font` and `next` are
different it will encourage you to try to update them both.
Removes the usage of `error-loader` when importing from
`pages/_document.js`, handle that case with `WellKnownErrorsPlugin` as
well.
The current warning when using different versions is removed. If the
versions are incompatible you'll get an error in the overlay instead.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Currently in dev the `_devPagesManifest` includes the `/app` routes as
well. However, In production, the `_buildManifest.js` does not include
the `/app` routes. This causes the `/pages` router to behave differently
in the two environments.
This change excludes the `/app` routes from `_devPagesManifest` to make
it work the same in dev/prod.
Fixes#42513Fixes#42532
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes#41995Closes#43144
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Bruno Nascimento <bruno.hn@icloud.com>
Do not directly import app-render into base-server since base-server is
shared module for both nodejs SSR and edge SSR.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
As discussed [here](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1668425692084449), we don't need the timestamp for CSS resources in the app dir for now as we are not preloading them. Manually tested with Safari and added corresponding e2e tests.
Closes#42862.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This allows filtering out known traces that should be ignored even if
`node-file-trace` detects them as being potentially used.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1668761350086149)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
The fix in #42793 added an unnecessary step by returning a new async function when the result is a promise. We only have to make sure we don't get an unhandledRejection error if the promise rejects, React takes care of getting the data from the promise.
Ref: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1668528003500329?thread_ts=1668434306.364449&cid=C035J346QQL)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fix: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42398
relates to
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42626#pullrequestreview-1172032873
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This adds a new `experimental.middlewarePrefetch` config with two modes
with the default being the `flexible` config.
- `strict` only prefetches when the `href` explicitly matches an SSG
route (won't prefetch for middleware rewrite usage unless manual
`href`/`as` values are used)
- `flexible` always prefetches ensuring middleware rewrite usage is
handled and also prevents executing SSR routes during prefetch to avoid
unexpected invocations
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39920
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C047HMFN58X/p1668473101696689?thread_ts=1667856323.709179&cid=C047HMFN58X)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Ensures we check for backslashes as well when matching `/page`. Will
investigate adding the app suite to windows CI in follow-up
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42996
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/43019
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
When building (`next/build/index.ts`) files ending with `page.js` got
picked up by the RegEx which meant files like `not-a-page.js` ended up
as a page. This change makes sure the segment actually starts with
`page`.
Dev had the same issue and also missed taking `pageExtensions` into
account.
Fixes#42972
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
