* Add licences to all example/package.json that lack them
* Revert "Add licences to all example/package.json that lack them"
This reverts commit 5d4e25012f7334772b8ef5924bc355277e827cba.
* Update check-examples to remove `license` field from examples
* Remove `license` from all examples.
This was mentioned in vercel/next.js#27121 but it looks like it didn't end up being in the merge?
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Clean up package.json files in the `examples` directory:
- Add `private: true`
- Remove `version` (because they are irrelevant for packages that are not meant to be published)
- Remove `name` (because they are optional for packages that are not meant to be published, and when someone clones an example, they often rename it and the property becomes stale)
- Remove `author`
- Remove `description`
- Remove `license`
Also remove `with-dynamic-app-layout` example completely, since it does the same as `layout-component` (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/27121#discussion_r668178408).
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
[With next 11 requiring react 17](https://nextjs.org/blog/next-11#upgrade-guide), most of the examples
need to be updated, so the following snippet updated all the examples to
a compatible react version.
```bash
cd examples/
fd -g 'package.json' | xargs sed -r -i 's/"react": ".*"/"react": "^17.0.2"/
fd -g 'package.json' | xargs sed -r -i 's/"react-dom": ".*"/"react-dom": "^17.0.2"/'
# exclude experimental react version
git checkout with-reason-relay/package.json
```
* Run prettier over packages/**/*.js
* Run prettier over packages/**/*.ts
* Run prettier over examples
* Remove tslint
* Run prettier over examples
* Run prettier over all markdown files
* Run prettier over json files
Hello,
I have been using next.js for a while in a bunch of projects, so first for all thanks for all the vibrant effort around the project 🖤.
Always I see the server side next.js approach as an advantage, but also a weakness for the extra resources you need to have, specially comparing how cheap is a client side app.
In order to do my things cheaper, I started using the SSR pattern you suggested in your examples, so useful! It saves time and resources.
However, it was *too simple*. In a real production scenario, you need a bit more, specially related with send the right response headers to keep the rest of external network agent updated of your cache state.
I started a tiny script code for doing that; basically, I copy/paste it on my ssr projects.
Now, after a time, I think it's worth it publish it as [cacheable-response](https://github.com/Kikobeats/cacheable-response) module.
The PR is for adding the module leverage into the next.js ssr example.
It's doing the same, plus:
- be possible use a multi storage cache (memory by default; mongodb, redis, mysql, supported).
- sending `cache-control` response headers.
- sending `X-Cache-Expired-At`, just a humanize way to see the expiration time.
- support for forcing invalidation via `force=true` query parameter.
I hope you like it 🙂
I wrote a [script](https://github.com/j0lv3r4/dependency-version-updater) to update dependencies recursively in `package.json` files, e.g.:
```
$ node index.js --path="./examples" --dependencies="react=^16.7.0,react-dom=^16.7.0"
```
This PR contains the result against the examples folder.
