This is an initial implementation of the Server Components SWC
transformer. For the server graph, it detects client entries via the
`"client"` directive and transpile them into module reference code; for
the client graph, it removes the directives. And for both graphs, it
checks if there is any invalid imports for the given environment and
shows proper errors.
With that added, we can switch from `next-flight-client-loader` to
directly use the SWC loader in one pass. Next step is to get rid of the
`.client.` extension in other plugins.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Collect telemetry info about packages are used and eliminated in `getServerSideProps`
https://github.com/vercel/next-telemetry/pull/71
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Feature
Implements feature requested in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30805.
A few people including myself have been looking to use Relay with Next.JS and want to use the new Rust Compiler. This is my stab at an implementation.
### How it works?
Finds all `graphql` tagged template experssions and replaces them with `require`s to the file generated by Relay.
### Where I need help
- I've only worked with Rust a handful of times so I would appreciate any feedback on my use of language features.
- Is there any performance overhead to many duplicate usages of `require`? I imagine there's a cache in place but I want to be sure.
- I've added some unit tests & integration tests but I might be missing some use cases. Feel free to comment some use cases I'm not thinking about.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- I haven't added any docs since this is an experimental API.
## Documentation / Examples
You're expected to be running the Relay Compiler along side Next.JS when you're developing. This is pretty standard. I wouldn't expect people to have any problem with this.
### Usage
In your `next.config.js`
```js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
relay: {
language: 'typescript', // or 'javascript`
artifactDirectory: 'path/to/you/artifact/directory' // you can leave this undefined if you did not specify one in the `relay.json`
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
