In #38647, @balazsorban44 has migrated the rule `no-img-element` to
typescript. The PR follows #38647 by migrating the entire
`eslint-plugin-next` to use typescript. Note it is still possible to
write new rules in javascript.
The PR does the following things:
- Migrates all `utils` to typescript
- All previous JSDoc are also converted to the type definitions
- Creates a utility method `defineRule`
- This is a stub function to provide the type check ability.
- With the `defineRule` we don't have to tediously import type
definition `Rule.RuleMetaData` and `Rule.RuleModule['create']` from
`eslint` anymore, `defineRule` will provide auto-complete and
typechecking for `meta` and `create`.
- Migrates all rules to typescript
- Extra type guards are also added to make typescript happy.
All existing `eslint-config-next` unit test cases passed after the
migration.
Utilize `turbo` for `dev`, and make sure polyfills are built. Fixes#40334
Another option would be to document that an initial `pnpm build` is necessary in [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#developing).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Follow-up on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38534#pullrequestreview-1035020450
This lets us use modern JS/TS syntax in ESLint rules and avoid issues like #38530 and #36693
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
@ijjk moving this here.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR adds a new `experimental.enableUndici` option to let the
developer switch from `next-fetch` to `undici` as the underlying
polyfill for `fetch` in Node.js.
In the current implementation, Next.js makes sure that `fetch` is always
available by using `node-fetch`. However, we do not polyfill in Node.js
18+, since those versions come with their own `fetch` implementation
already, built-in.
Node.js 18+ uses `undici` under the hood, so letting the developer use
`undici` earlier could make the migration easier later on.
Eventually, we hope to be able to stop polyfilling `fetch` in an
upcoming major version of Next.js, shipping less code.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: Sukka <isukkaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This PR adds the benchmarking script I've been using for #40251 to
measure the performance improvements that we make to the Edge SSR
runtime.
This tool:
- uploads two version of the benchmarking project to Vercel, one with
the latest canary and the one with your current local changes in dist
(don't forget to build!)
- runs some tests against the published url to measure TTFB
- displays a nice chart and table
What this doesn't do (yet):
- allow you to choose which URL to compare
- allow you to change the measured metric
- run a battery of differnet test
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/191270204-04447e20-5a40-43a9-bcda-b7eaeb3d270a.mov
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
For some context:
https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509
Adds `@next/font` package.
`scripts/update-google-fonts.js` generates functions and metadata for
all available google fonts. The metadata is used in `loader.ts` to
validate font options (from #40221). It then fetches the CSS from google
fonts, downloads the font files and emits them as static assets.
The actual integration with `packages/next` and integration tests
depends on #40221, will follow up with new PR.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Problem
Currently the Next.js infer utility (`InferGetServerSidePropsType` and
`InferGetStaticPropsType`) types can lead to a wrong inferred types
(`never`). This happens if these functions return something different
than: `{props: {}}`.
**Example:** `getServerSideProps`
```typescript
export async function getServerSideProps({ query }: GetServerSidePropsContext) {
if (query.foo) {
return {
notFound: true,
}
}
return {
props: {
foo: "bar"
},
}
}
type PageProps = InferGetServerSidePropsType<typeof getServerSideProps>
// => type PageProps = never
```
**Example:** `getStaticProps`
```typescript
import type { InferGetStaticPropsType, GetStaticPropsContext } from 'next'
export async function getStaticProps(context: GetStaticPropsContext) {
if (context.params?.bar) {
return {
notFound: true,
}
}
return {
props: {
foo: 'bar',
},
}
}
type PageProps = InferGetStaticPropsType<typeof getStaticProps>
// => type PageProps = never
```
This is because the first infer condition of the utility type is not
satified leading to a never result.
```typescript
export type InferGetServerSidePropsType<T> = T extends GetServerSideProps<
infer P, // <- NOT SATISFIED
any
>
? P
: T extends (
context?: GetServerSidePropsContext<any>
) => Promise<GetServerSidePropsResult<infer P>>
? P
: never // <- NOT SATISFIED
```
## Solution
I have experimented with different solutions ending with a much simpler
type, that is faster to execute, easier to read and universally usable
for both prop variations.
```typescript
/**
* Flow:
* - Make sure getStaticProps is a function
* - Get its return type
* - Extract the one that contains {props: any}
* - Return the props
*/
export type InferGetStaticPropsType<T extends (args: any) => any> = Extract<
Awaited<ReturnType<T>>,
{ props: any }
>['props']
```
## Bug
- [x] Related issues: fixes#36615, #15913,
https://twitter.com/leeerob/status/1563540593003106306
- [x] Type tests added
## Future thoughts
Since `InferGetStaticPropsType` and `InferGetServerSidePropsType` are
now the same, it's api could be merged into one utility type (e.g:
InferNextProps). I recommend doing this in a different PR.
## Additional info
I have tested this approach using the following [external
package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/infer-next-props-type)
(@timneutkens sorry for the late PR). Since about 12 Month I haven't
received any negative feedback (issues) regarding this approach.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fixes build errors related to
https://github.com/browserslist/caniuse-lite/issues/102
see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3082979772/jobs/4983345078
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Only upgrade react-exp.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
x-ref: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/25267
Bump the version of `react-server-dom-webpack` and use `experimental_use` to unwrap the promise to access RSC payload instead of using `readRoot`. `readRoot` is removed from the response type.
- Use React.startTransition instead of useTransition
- Upgrade to latest React experimental
- Split router cache invalidate into separate function
Some minor cleanup while verifying behaviors.
`eslint-plugin-react` has a broken version between v7.31.2-6. Upping the version range ensure that only functioning packages get installed.
Fixes#40245
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This serves to add support for [Subresource
Integrity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity)
hashes for scripts added from the new app directory. This also has
support for utilizing nonce values passed from request headers (expected
to be generated per request in middleware) in the bootstrapping scripts
via the `Content-Security-Policy` header as such:
```
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'nonce-2726c7f26c'
```
Which results in the inline scripts having a new `nonce` attribute hash
added. These features combined support for setting an aggressive Content
Security Policy on scripts loaded.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
