add `experimental.esmExternals: boolean | 'loose'` config option
remove `output.environment` configuration in favor of `target`
| | `esmExternals: false` (default) | `esmExternals: 'loose'` | `esmExternals: true` |
| ------------------------ | ------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -------------------- |
| import cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
| require cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
| import mixed package | `require()` *** | `import()` | `import()` |
| require mixed package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
| import pure esm package | `import()` | `import()` | `import()` |
| require pure esm package | Error ** | `import()` * | Error ** |
| import pure cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | Resolving error |
| require pure cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
cjs package: Offers only CJS implementation (may not even have an `exports` field)
mixed package: Offers CJS and ESM implementation via `exports` field
pure esm package: Only offers an ESM implementation (may not even have an `exports` field)
pure cjs package: CommonJs package that prevents importing via `exports` field when `import` is used.
`*` This case will behave a bit unexpected for now, since `require` will return a Promise. So that need to be awaited. This will be fixed once the whole next.js bundle is ESM. It didn't work at all before this PR.
`**` This is a new Error when trying to require an esm package.
`***` For mixed packages we prefer the CommonJS variant to avoid a breaking change.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Since we are no longer accepting new built-in loaders, users may wish to use a different cloud provider.
So this PR renames `dangerously-unoptimized` to `custom` to handle this case as well as the intention of `next export`.
If the user doesn't add a `loader` prop, we throw an error.
If the user adds a `loader` prop but it doesn't return the width, we print a warning.
- Follow up to #26847
- Fixes#21079
- Fixes#19612
- Related to #26850
This decreases the body size limit that triggers a warning from 5MB -> 4MB, which provides a little more wiggle room. Certain things like using base64 on body, headers, path, etc can cause the response to be larger than initially calculated.
Initial PR: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/26831
This PR adds a warning when api responses exceed 5mb since this will end up failing once deployed. In a future version this scenario will throw an error.
## Bug
- [x] Integration tests added
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
There are strict conditions for using `placeholder=blur` documented in #25949 but this will give the user a better understanding during `next dev` and links to the error.
- Error when `placeholder=blur` and no `blurDataURL`
- The Error for small images with `placeholder=blur` has been changed to a warning
- Added support for blurring a webp image
- Added error page linking to relevant docs
* docs: use descriptive links instead of "click here"
Linking text such as "here" or "click here" is not accessible (and
doesn't look that great either). The best example of why it's better to
use link text that provides context is that some screen readers allow
navigation by links alone. If all links say "click here", then how does
the user know which one to go to?
I tried to make the minimal change necessary to make the link text
descriptive but had to reword a few sentences that didn't read well.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Enable webpack 5 by default for all apps
Still provides a way to opt-out using `webpack5: false` in next.config.js. Also throws an error for `future.webpack5`.
* Update tests
* Update test to run on webpack 4 instead of webpack 5
* disable webpack5 for legacy tests
* Fix stats-config for webpack4
* update tests
* update size for webpack4 test
* move basic suite first
* update basic test
* Add logs
* remove outdated testFutureDependencies job
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Makes sure a helpful error is shown for `<Link>` with multiple children
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Adds lint rules to the Next.js ESLint plugin to:
- Disallow importing `next/head` inside `pages/_document.js`
- Disallow importing `next/document` outside of `pages/_document.js`
Both rules will be surfaced as **errors** within the recommended config of the plugin.
Fixes#13712#13958
Adds a lint rule warning to the Next.js ESLint plugin if a custom Google Font is added at page-level instead of with a custom document (`.document.js`)
_Note: This will be generalized to include more font providers in the near future._
This PR re-includes ESLint with some notable changes, namely a guided setup similar to how TypeScript is instantiated in a Next.js application.
To add ESLint to a project, developers will have to create an `.eslintrc` file in the root of their project or add an empty `eslintConfig` object to their `package.json` file.
```js
touch .eslintrc
```
Then running `next build` will show instructions to install the required packages needed:
<img width="862" alt="Screen Shot 2021-04-19 at 7 38 27 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/115316182-dfd51b00-a146-11eb-830c-90bad20ed151.png">
Once installed and `next build` is run again, `.eslintrc` will be automatically configured to include the default config:
```json
{
"extends": "next"
}
```
In addition to this change:
- The feature is now under the experimental flag and requires opt-in. After testing and feedback, it will be switched to the top-level namespace and turned on by default.
- A new ESLint shareable configuration package is included that can be extended in any application with `{ extends: 'next' }`
- This default config extends recommended rule sets from [`eslint-plugin-react`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react), [`eslint-plugin-react-hooks`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react-hooks), and [`eslint-plugin-next`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@next/eslint-plugin-next)
- All rules in [`eslint-plugin-next`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@next/eslint-plugin-next) have been modified to include actionable links that show more information to help resolve each issue
Noticed in this issue the reproduction was using `getStaticPaths` on a non-dynamic page incorrectly although we don't currently show an error for this.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/22931
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Adds an err.sh link to the production build missing message. Also clears up `valid` as `production`.
Also fixes an edge case where an unhelpful error would be thrown because we checked for `.next` instead of `.next/BUILD_ID`
Added the out directory location as the list line during export to make sure people know where the files are output.
Fixes#19778Fixes#19788
* make the error message more clear if webpack config comes back undefined
* Update check and add test
* bump
* Update build-output test
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Add err.sh for image config errors
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Add err.sh for missing images domain
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Update test
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Removes `next-head-count`, improving support for 3rd party libraries that insert or append new elements to `<head>`.
---
This is more or less what a solution with a `data-` attribute would look like, except that instead of directly searching for elements with that attribute, we serialize the elements expected in `<head>` and then find them/assume ownership of them during initialization (in a manner similar to React's reconciliation) based on their properties.
There are two main assumptions here:
1. Content is served with compression, so duplicate serialization of e.g. inline script or style tags doesn't have a meaningful impact. Storing a hash would be a potential optimization.
2. 3rd party libraries primarily only insert new, unique elements to head. Libraries trying to actively manage elements that overlap with those that Next.js claims ownership of will still be unsupported.
The reason for this roundabout approach is that I'd really like to avoid `data-` if possible, for maximum compatibility. Implicitly adding an attribute could be a breaking change for some class of tools or crawlers and makes it otherwise impossible to insert raw HTML into `<head>`. Adding an unexpected attribute is why the original `class="next-head"` approach was problematic in the first place!
That said, while I don't expect this to be more problematic than `next-head-count` (anything that would break in this new model also should have broken in the old model), if that does end up being the case, it might make sense to just bite the bullet.
Fixes#11012Closes#16707
---
cc @Timer @timneutkens
Warn users and revert their `devtool` when they manually change the `devtool` in development mode. For this addition, I check to ensure the `devtool` is custom (i.e. different than what is set by Next) and has a value (`false` is fine as a custom `devtool`!).
As described in [this issue (13963)](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/13963), changing the `devtool` in development mode can cause issues with performance.
Fixes#13963
**First, apologies for a second PR on the same issue but I was working on this already so I thought I'd push it and let you decide which you want to merge.**
The PR is related to [13466](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/13466).
Based on my research, the error happens if the options are empty, null, or undefined. That's why I have decided that the most proper check would be using the! post-fix expression operator may assert that its operand is non-null and non-undefined. ``if (options == null)``
(Optional)
I have also added a warning, which warns the user if the passed "dev" variable is not a boolean.
It's my first PR on the "packages" part of the repo so I'd be glad to receive all kinds of critics. If you want me to change or remove anything, I'm open to suggestions.
---
Fixes#13466
* Enable .env support by default
Given we've had tons of reports from various people that expected .env support to work even though they had dotenv installed already I think it's fine to enable it as a default:
Fixes#12728
* Remove old test
* Fix duplicate env loading
* Update docs
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
