This is a bug fix as we are currently traversing all modules in the
client compiler to collect the reference info. However, this is only
relevant to modules in the `appClient` layer. It fixes some bug where a
module is imported by both app/ and pages/ so the same resource path
causes a conflict.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Closes#45485.
Currently we always output the first error message from the compiler to
avoid making the CLI noisy. However for RSC the first error can
potentially be the consequence of another error which is the real cause.
In #45485, the first error was `Attempted import error: 'includes' is
not exported from '@remirror/core-helpers'` but it was actually caused
by the failure of bundling a package `get-dom-document`. The package is
one of the deps of another package, and then that package is a dep of
`@remirror/core-helpers`. Everything in the dependency chain failed to
import but we only shows the first one (probably the leaf), which makes
it impossible to debug.
This PR fixes it by throwing a special error when we notice that
something is not bundle-able in RSC. And in the output process we
prioritize RSC bundling and RSC errors first — as they are usually the
cause of other errors.
The new error message looks like this:
<img width="981" alt="CleanShot-2023-02-16-8HUK7vAZ@2x"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3676859/219216666-7521ca52-68e0-41ed-9219-4d49535f5645.png">
And by applying that change the error will be resolved.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
System entrypoints such as like `amp` can be included in the same chunk group of a module we are trying to load, but they are guaranteed to be existing and there's no need to list them in the manifest's chunks.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- Add test for edge route
- Add edge route loader
- Ensure edge route does not trigger static generation
- Remove unused import
- Use new loader during compilation
- Add names for routeKind to help debugging
- Ensure route is considered a appDir page
- Return response from edge runtime
- Handle edge route in dev and prod
Fixes NEXT-510
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Move initial into the cache, so the top level boundaries will wrap the
head contents. Then we can use navigation API like `notFound` in the
`generateMetadata`, the notFound errors could be still captured in that
case
Closes NEXT-292
Added tests for not found in metadata
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
Enables using `next/font` by adding `@next/font` as a dependency and
reexporting its loaders.
Always generates the `font-loader-manifest` as we can't know beforehand
if the user intends to use `next/font` or not.
Also adds telemetry for `next/font` usage.
The tests are updated to use `next/font`. But `@next/font` is tested in
`test/e2e/next-font/index.test.ts` and `test/e2e/app-dir/next-font` as
well to ensure it doesn't break.
Fixes NEXT-351
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Use the Metadata API instead of creating a `head.js` when automatically
creating a root layout. The generated layout is the same as the one in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45819, but with a different title
and description.
Automatic root layout:
```tsx
export const metadata = {
title: 'Next.js',
description: 'Generated by Next.js',
}
export default function RootLayout({
children,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode
}) {
return (
<html lang="en">
<body>{children}</body>
</html>
)
}
```
Fixes NEXT-545
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
pagePaths are windows file paths with backslashes, normalize them before searching the page file. so it could pick up edge runtime option properly
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Resolves the comments from beta docs
* fix typing of `metadata.authors` rendering
* add `metadata.manifest` field
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Bug
The `next build` command is silently overriding the user's tsconfig when
it shouldn't be; this results in mismatched behavior between `tsc
--noEmit` and `yarn build` and user confusion.
For example, a configuration option like `"moduleResolution":
"nodenext"`, which is preserved and respected by `next dev`, will be
silently overridden to `"moduleResolution": "node"` during `next build`.
This change:
- Fixes#38854
- (probably fixes) #45452 (I have not verified)
- (probably fixes) #41189 (I have not verified)
## Details
Next has a concept of both _defaults_ and _permitted options_ when
modifying/validating the user's tsconfig. The user's config is only
modified if it does not match the _permitted options_. This means that
if the user has specified a permitted value like `"moduleResolution":
"nodenext"`, it will not be overwritten in the user's config file.
However, there was some logic in `runTypeCheck.ts` that did not
adequately capture this nuance – instead, it spread all of the defaults
into the tsconfig it was building before running typecheck, which meant
that if a user had specified an option that was _permitted_ but
_non-default_, it would be overwritten, silently, during `yarn build`
only.
Because Next is already (1) rewriting the TSconfig in
`writeConfigurationDefaults` when the user's config doesn't line up with
what we're expecting and (2) verifying the user's TSConfig remains
correct (in `verifyTypeScriptSetup`) during a `next build`, I believe
that it is safe to remove this config-steamrolling behavior.
## Documentation / Examples
I believe this is strictly a bugfix; it updates the behavior of `next
build` to conform to the same configuration behavior exhibited by `tsc
--noEmit` and `next dev`. Since this is already the user expectation, it
should not require documentation changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#45088.
Rewrite the type guard implementation, it now works via 2 parts:
- `Diff<A, B>` this makes sure that `B` is either `any` or extends `A`, and then excludes all fields in `A` from `B`, only keeps the extra fields
- `checkFields<X>()` ensures that `X` doesn't have any fields
So with `checkFields<Diff<ExpectedInterface, Interface>>()` we can ensure that it is a valid interface and it does not have extra fields. For functions, we use the same utility to check parameter types and return types.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
In dev mode, instead of `resolve(resolvedMetadata)` for the parent metadata argument we pass down `resolve(freeze(deepClone(resolvedMetadata)))` as parent metdadata, this approach will avoid users mutating resolved metadata manually but still allowing next manage to merge it during resolving
Closes NEXT-559
- [x] linked task
- [x] e2e tests
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
I believe this fixes `<Link>`s that appear inside an `<svg>`. For
example:
```typescript
<svg width={200} height={200}>
<Link href="/about">
<a>
<text x={0} y={20}>About</text>
</a>
</Link>
</svg>
```
There's a comment in `next/link` (["anchors inside an svg have a
lowercase
nodeName"](bef709bc74/packages/next/client/link.tsx (L163)))
that implies `Link`s are supposed to work inside an `svg`, but at the
moment, I'm finding that clicking the link causes a full page reload.
This seems to be because Next.js considers the link to be a 'modified'
event (as per `isModifiedEvent`). In the case where the event's
`currentTarget` is an `SVGAElement` (rather than a `HTMLAnchorElement`),
the `event.currentTarget.target` is actually an
[`SVGAnimatedString`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/SVGAnimatedString).
This looks a bit like `{"animVal": "", "baseVal": ""}`, so the `(target
&& target !== '_self')` check is truthy.
Using
[`getAttribute`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/getAttribute)
instead seems to consistently give a string value in either (SVG or
HTML) case.
I've attempted to add a test, but I haven't worked out how to run it
yet...
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45716 this ensures
we correctly construct the initial URL value as it must be a fully
qualified URL. Existing tests caught this failure when running in deploy
mode.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
This is improved followup for
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45914, I realized I applied retry
count logic only for the teardown, not for the actual execution. PR
changes whole retrycount if predicate matches, also changes minor
ergonomics for the turbopack output with custom binary.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
Currently after enabling `typedRoute`, I can't add `className` so I
checked the type and found it's missing `AnchorHTMLAttributes`. This pr
adds them
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
When you're trying to migrate an application from `pages/` to `app/`,
you'll need to access data like search parameters and the pathname in a
way that lets you migrate safely.
This adds support for dynamic typing of some of those exported functions
from `next/navigation`, namely `useSearchParams` and `usePathname`.
Currently, `searchParams` can’t be known when prerendering if the page
doesn’t use [Server-side
Rendering](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching/get-server-side-props)
in the `pages/` directory. `pathname` can’t be known during prerendering
if the page is a fallback page or has been automatically statically
optimized when accessed from `pages/`.
To make migraitons easier, this adds a new feature to `next dev` that
will automatically add the correct types for `next/navigation`. It does
this by checking if you have both a `app/` and `pages/` directory. If it
detects you have a `app/` directory, it will also enable the suggested
Typescript feature,
[`structNullChecks`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig#strictNullChecks)
which will warn developers when trying to access a value that may be
`null`.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This adds updated matching handle for the server to separate out the matching and executing of different route types e.g. page routes, API routes, and app routes.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
The PR upgrades `cross-spawn` to `7.0.3`. The precompiled has also been
updated. The `cross-spawn` version is still pinned after the PR.
-----
So I have been working on improving Next.js build performance recently.
One thing that catches my eye is this:
<img width="1751" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/40715044/218383194-5b24c737-0d97-4434-bbbf-ba5752072882.png">
The flamegraph shows the `semver` inside `cross-spawn` is one of the
hottest functions.
Then I take a look at the `cross-spawn`, turns out that `cross-spawn`
has `semver` already removed:
https://github.com/moxystudio/node-cross-spawn/pull/125
According to the CHANGELOG of `cross-spawn`, the only breaking change is
that `cross-spawn@7` is dropping `Node.js < 8` support. So I assume it
would be fine to upgrade `cross-spawn` to the latest version `7.0.3`,
thus eliminating the extra performance overhead introduced by `semver`.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This adds a top-level experimental config for including/excluding files
from the file traces. This replaces the page level
`unstable_includeFiles`/`unstable_excludeFiles` as those had some
drawbacks such as not being supported for API routes as these files
aren't required during build to gather the configs, having to duplicate
includes/excludes for multiple pages, and causing more confusion for
where the globs were meant to be relative to.
The new top-level configs allow mapping page globs to includes/excludes
so they can be shared across multiple pages or a single page. These can
also affect the `next-server` trace by specifying that as the key if
necessary. The previous `outputFileTraceIgnores` config is automatically
mapped to the new config with a deprecation warning.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Disable streaming SSR for `pages`, preferring the static rendering. This
was leftover from when we implemented the server components alpha on
`pages` and causes issues for people upgrading from Next.js 12 to 13
when the `chunked` response is unexpected, e.g. with certain CDN setups.
Streaming is the default in `app` and that has the right implementation
to fully leverage streaming in React including when navigating
client-side as the router is built around React transitions.
Fixes#45750Closes#45822
Fixes NEXT-514
Ensures rootlayout marker is copied into the optimistic tree.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
If `config.i18n` exists with `defaultLocale` and there's a redirect that
looks like this:
```js
{
source: '/',
destination: '/destination',
permanent: false,
}
```
Then, if you access `/`:
- **Expected:** It redirects to `/destination`
- **Actual:** redirects to `/<defaultLocale>/destination`
This PR fixes it by adding a missing special-case logic for `/` in
`packages/next/src/lib/load-custom-routes.ts`.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1676271611253739)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR enables `ignoreDynamic` for common js modules which is detected
by `auto_cjs` pass.
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/40231.
---
I verified that with this change the test reproduction does not fail
with import error.
---------
Added tests:
- Add tests for interception+parallel and interception
- Add test for parallel route tab bar
- Add test for back/forward navigation on parallel routes
Core changes:
- Updated handling of parallel route matcher `@` to produce the correct
router tree
- Fixed global-error resolving, it was resolving from the `page.js` on
each level. It should only live next to the root layout only, so now it
resolves when it finds the root layout.
- `applyRouterStatePatchToTree` now merges the levels of the original
tree and the patch. This ensures parallel routes that are not affected
by the response from the server are not removed from the tree.
- Ensure cache nodes are not removed when they're not affected by tree
patch, this ensures parallel route cache nodes will not be removed when
navigating.
Other changes:
- Added launch app-dir build to launch.json for vscode debugger
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
