This onClick isn't actually being used by the test and seems to be
causing a flake unrelated to the test assertions. This removes the
unused code for now so we can still keep the relevant part of the test
in-tact. (Specifically, this test is asserting that we're using the
correct prefetch cache entry for interception routes that originate from
different trees but resolve to the same URL)
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2568
### Why?
I really dislike the way `.chain` works right now, it shouldn't mutate
the `BrowserInterface`, this PR changes it so it's just a pure chain
without weird side effects.
One example with the current version (before this PR):
```
const el = browser.elementByCss('#version-2')
await el.text()
// throws
await el.text()
```
### Additional Changes
- removes selenium (which is completely unused)
- updates playwright
- makes the playwright tracing not error all the time
In #61794, the routes manifest is used to find the interception route rewrites in `next-server` and computed on the fly in `next-dev-server` based on `appPaths`.
The edge runtime doesn't have access to the routes manifest nor a full list of app paths. This writes an entry for the edge runtime to make the interception routes readable, and adds plumbing to return them in the `getInterceptionRouteRewrites` handling in `web-server`. This is what we use to signal to the server whether to return ‘Next-URL’ in the Vary for RSC requests.
This piggybacks on the existing interception routes test but adds an edge runtime case.
Closes NEXT-2304
### What & Why?
Interception routes depend on contextual information that are provided
via request headers. Specifically it needs to know about the
`Next-Router-State-Tree` when generating the interception route RSC
data, which isn't available at build time. This doesn't currently cause
any usage issues, but it erroneously emits static files & RSC payloads
that the client router won't be able to use and will instead fallback to
a dynamic request.
I removed some special case in an existing test since this fix also
resolves a discrepancy in behavior when PPR is turned on
### How?
This excludes interception routes from `appStaticPaths` at builds which
currently determines which pages should be statically generated.
Closes NEXT-2190
### What?
When handling route interception in two different segments but handled
by the same interception route, the first interception will show the
correct component but attempting the same interception on another
segment will return elements from the first request, not the second.
### Why?
Prefetch cache entries are created from the browser URL. However, route
interception makes use of `nextUrl` to mask the underlying components
that are being fetched from the server to handle the request
Consider the following scenario:
```
app
foo
@modal
(...)post
[id]
bar
@modal
(...post)
[id]
post
[id]
```
If you trigger an interception on `/foo`, your URL is going to be masked
to `/post/1` and keyed as such in the prefetch cache. However, the cache
entry is actually associated with `app/foo/@modal/(...post)/[id]`. That
means when you trigger the same interception on `/bar`, it will return
the tree from `/foo`.
### How?
This PR will prefix the prefetch cache key with `state.nextUrl` when
necessary.
Fixes#49878Fixes#52748
Closes NEXT-1818
