Refining the message that uses "use with caution" instead of "use at
your own risk" as some experimental features was functionally stable but
we can't bring them as default for now and need to test as experiments
Closes NEXT-2286
### What
Given user infomation when the dynamic errors are thrown, e.g. bad
`cookies` or `headers` usages. Now users can tell through the error
information to see which pathname is broken, and trace down the usage.
#### before
```
Page couldn't be rendered statically because ...
This page needs to bail out of prerendering at this point because ...
```
#### after
```
Route /cookies couldn't be rendered statically because ...
Route /server needs to bail out of prerendering at this point because ...
```
### Why
When you have multi pages in your app, such as 100+, and many page might
uses these. This is hard to trace down where exactly the error is from
Closes NEXT-2283
Cloese NEXT-2265
When we apply `createActionProxy` twice to the same value, it currently
errors because we can't override the ID of it.
This PR makes sure that 1) when the value already have an ID defined, we
skip setting it again; 2) all the action IDs are being tracked even for
duplicated ones.
Note that it's technically impossible to "detect" the duplication here
(via static analyzation) and only set it once. For example:
```ts
'use server'
export async function foo () {}
export const bar = a_value_we_dont_know_yet ? foo : async () => {}
```
So, the compiler will always wrap `createActionProxy` for every exported
value and assume they're different Server Actions (hence different IDs).
With this fix, if we find that it's already defined before, we just
return the defined reference as they're strictly identical so the ID
does't matter.
Closes#54655, closes#61183.
Closes NEXT-2264
This PR fixes the cookie merging logic in Server Actions. Specifically,
when users do `cookies().set(...)` or `cookies.delete(...)` with a
`redirect()` to an internal route followed. Currently, we are just
concatenating the original cookies (request cookies) and the mutated
cookies. That introduces several issues, like it can't override or
delete an existing cookie.
Closes NEXT-2221
Reverts changes from #61173 & #60240 (while leaving the tests that were
added).
There are too many spots where considering `/default` routes as pages
needs to be carefully considered in different runtimes, and it turns out
that it's not actually needed to handle the case that it was originally
added for. I confirmed that the test that added the case it was intended
to fix (`parallel-routes-catchall-default`, along with the unit tests in
`normalize-catchall-routes`) are still passing as expected.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
#61159 fixed the documentation by removing incorrect information stating
that the type parameter must be set to 'page' when the path contains a
dynamic segment. This PR reflects this change in the warning message,
while confirming that the condition for the warning is already correct.
Additionally, I changed the word "affect" to "effect," assuming it was a
typo. In the documentation, I corrected myself and changed the wording
from "argument is required" to "parameter is required".
### What?
When using layouts in multiple parallel route slots, only 1 of the
layouts would render.
### Why?
The `resolveParallelSegments` logic responsible for populating the
loader tree was incorrectly bailing if it found another parallel route
that matched a page component.
### How?
I did my best to update this loader code with some more comments to make
it a bit easier to reason about, and also made some slight refactors.
But the gist of the fix is just ensuring that each parallel route (that
isn't a direct match on the `children` slot) is resolved as an array, so
that when the subtree is created, it doesn't skip over the slot.
Fixes#58506Fixes#59463
Closes NEXT-2222
This PR is refactoring only and doesn't change the logic, therefore no
tests were added.
The improvement here is readability:
- separate functions to fetch external vs internal image (in the future,
we could improve perf of internal image routing)
- types of the arguments are more specific (rather than passing in
complete NextConfig)
> Note: Its easier to review with whitespace hidden:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/61172/files?w=1
When there's `useSearchParams` hook triggers the bailout to client side
rendering, users might hard to find where it's from since it could
either from users code base or third party libraries. Adding the stack
trace for it so they could at least investigate which line is throwing
from the server bundle. Will improve it in the later future when we can
give more insights.
#### After
```
⨯ useSearchParams() should be wrapped in a suspense boundary at page "/". Read more: https://
nextjs.org/docs/messages/missing-suspense-with-csr-bailout
at a (/private/var/folders/gy/kq4zjn8s0ljf9sfjyyh_nj640000gn/T/next-install-aa5f331b7f6af2
82fd9bab0f69685454d1f50dc8f3c775da23d4e5e807a970cb/.next/server/chunks/846.js:1:9912)
at h (/private/var/folders/gy/kq4zjn8s0ljf9sfjyyh_nj640000gn/T/next-install-aa5f331b7f6af2
82fd9bab0f69685454d1f50dc8f3c775da23d4e5e807a970cb/.next/server/chunks/846.js:1:22018)
at a (/private/var/folders/gy/kq4zjn8s0ljf9sfjyyh_nj640000gn/T/next-install-aa5f331b7f6af2
82fd9bab0f69685454d1f50dc8f3c775da23d4e5e807a970cb/.next/server/app/page.js:1:2518)
```
#### Before
```
⨯ useSearchParams() should be wrapped in a suspense boundary at page "/". Read more: https://
nextjs.org/docs/messages/missing-suspense-with-csr-bailout
```
Closes NEXT-2239
### What & Why
Using parallel routes with edge runtime would cause a build error when
using a default segment, because edge runtime has special handling to
[read the client reference
manifests](12c9040568/packages/next/src/build/utils.ts (L1543-L1555))
for these when determining if a page is static.
### How
In a similar fashion to how we exclude static checks on reserved pages,
I added similar handling for app pages.
Fixes#60917
Closes NEXT-2241
Context:
- on app router, we bundle all the code used both on server and client
- sentry used to be incompatible with that, however a raw require call
on production to Sentry leads to a 350ms impact on cold boots/initial
load
- it might be ok to bundle now, let's try it out
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2250
## What?
`exportPathMap` didn't work when Turbopack was enabled because the
`serializeNextConfig` function mutates the original values, overriding
`exportPathMap`.
This PR changes the serialization to copy the object and mutate only the
copied object.
Also refactored the test that was checking `_next`, the better way to
test that is to have the page render something dynamically, which is
what is added in this PR.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2225
### What
When users're using nextjs server API that break the build, and error
with incorrect client components usage.
Instrument should be treated as server components or server-only build
target, instead of being treated as client components.
### How
We added a new layer `instrument` for instrument hook bundling, and
apply it with the rsc server webpack loaders
Fixes#57563
Closes NEXT-2181
Closes NEXT-1994
### What?
Interception routes on dynamic paths don't currently work when PPR is
turned on, and instead trigger an MPA navigation to the full route.
### Why?
Route interception relies on the `Next-Flight-Router-State` header to
extract the dynamic params necessary to convert something like
`[locale]`, which would correspond with a URL of `/en`, to something
like `["locale", "en", "d"]`. (See [this
function](fbfd7b5f81/packages/next/src/server/app-render/app-render.tsx (L129-L137))
for more info). When PPR is turned on, we currently ignore this request
header and don't provide it to the functions that render the component
tree.
Without the flight router state, this function bails out and instead
will leave the segment key as `[locale]`. When the client router goes to
diff the current tree on the client with the response from the server,
it will detect a mismatch between the current segment and the incoming
segment, and trigger an MPA navigation in [this
block](fbfd7b5f81/packages/next/src/client/components/router-reducer/reducers/navigate-reducer.ts (L414-L416)).
### How?
This special-cases interception routes to not strip this header.
Closes NEXT-2215
### What
Fixes the string id that broken when sitemap is optimized to static
route.
### Why
When sitemap is optimized to static route in production, the route
argument is changed from `[[...__metadata_id__]]` to
`[__metadata_id__]`, so the type of it is also changed from array to
string that should reflect in the loader code.
Fixes#60894
Closes NEXT-2154
# Turbopack
* https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/7027 <!-- Donny/강동윤 - Update `swc_core` to `v0.87.28` -->
---
### What?
Update swc crates
### Why?
Required for #57718.
`styled-jsx` crate now has a hook to transform CSS code using a
Rust-side API
### How?
Fixes#57718
Closes PACK-2256
### What?
Update terser to the latest version.
### Why?
We need
c677e28526
which adds supports for class static blocks.
### How?
Closes PACK-2285
Fixes#60837
### What
We've had the Next.js version checker in dev overlay of webpack mode.
But it was missing for turbopack. Add it in turbopack mode and also give
a small marker `"(turbo)"` to highlight turbopack mode.
Screenshot
<img width="576" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/1bb1500c-fd92-43bd-a60a-ddc7cd63ce6f">
Closes NEXT-2196
Closes NEXT-2106
formalizes the concept of dynamic APIs inside Next to allow for varying
semantics beyond just staticGenerationBailout.
### Dynamic APIs
#### `markCurrentScopeAsDynamic`
useful to bail out of default caching semantics but does not imply a
Request specific data source was read. critically, this semantic is
ignored if you are inside a cache scope
#### `trackDynamicDataAccessed`
Must be called before reading any data source that is derived from
Request specific data. Currently this is `cookies()`, `headers()`, and
`searchParams`. This kind of data access inside a cache scope is
forbidden (it always should have been, but now it will error).
#### `trackDynamicFetch`
This one is unideal but the complexity of patch-fetch's current
implementation necessitates it for now. Essentially it will postpone if
we are prerendering. Long term this should be eliminated with a refactor
of patch fetch.
### Other Improvements
Also removes the `staticGenerationBailout` implementation as it has been
replaced with more specific logic in the places it was previously being
used.
One area that has also been enhanced is the proxy for app-route modules.
Previously we proxied the Request every time however when we are doing
non-static generation executions we generally don't want the overhead of
wrapping the request. In the refactor here I also improved the runtime
performance by using static proxy handlers and I believe I also fixed a
few bugs related to `clone` and `url`
In general there has been a bit of refactoring to clarify how we should
handle various render/execution states and a reduction in implicit side
effects for proper execution.
Another callout to notice is that app-route modules do not attempt a
static generation if they are force-dynamic regardless of the PPR
setting. Previously the PPR setting would opt them into this code path
which is not necessary because PPR itself does not work for routes, only
pages.
Closes NEXT-2099
