This PR updates the docs and examples for `create-next-app` to include pnpm usage.
The following script was used to update every example README:
```js
const fs = require('fs')
const examples = fs.readdirSync('./examples')
for (let example of examples) {
const filename = `./examples/${example}/README.md`
const markdown = fs.readFileSync(filename, 'utf8')
const regex = new RegExp(`^yarn create next-app --example (.*)$`, 'gm')
const output = markdown.replace(regex, (yarn, group) => {
const pnpm = `pnpm create next-app -- --example ${group}`
return `${yarn}\n# or\n${pnpm}`
})
fs.writeFileSync(filename, output)
}
```
Hello! I was using `npx create-next-app --ts` to quickly bootstrap a basic next.js project with Typescript. It bothered me that I got git diff just from running `npm run build` inside the project, because the new notice in the `next-env.d.ts` file.
So I went ahead and updated the `next-env.d.ts` file in [`packages/create-next-app/templates/typescript`](fb67ce9864/packages/create-next-app/templates/typescript/next-env.d.ts) to be exactly how the file looks after running once. (7417ecc09c)
Then I realized that I could probably do the same for all the `next-env.d.ts` that are spread out in the many examples, to make running those examples after cloning them feel a bit smoother. (fb67ce9864)
> However I skipped the [`with-typescript-graphql`](40f85f6d95/examples/with-typescript-graphql) example since that [`next-env.d.ts`](40f85f6d95/examples/with-typescript-graphql/next-env.d.ts (L4-L9)) actually has changes and I couldn't even run `yarn build` in that example, so I'm not sure what will happen with the `next-env.d.ts`. Someone who _gets_ that example will have to fix it I suppose.
Clean up package.json files in the `examples` directory:
- Add `private: true`
- Remove `version` (because they are irrelevant for packages that are not meant to be published)
- Remove `name` (because they are optional for packages that are not meant to be published, and when someone clones an example, they often rename it and the property becomes stale)
- Remove `author`
- Remove `description`
- Remove `license`
Also remove `with-dynamic-app-layout` example completely, since it does the same as `layout-component` (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/27121#discussion_r668178408).
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
[With next 11 requiring react 17](https://nextjs.org/blog/next-11#upgrade-guide), most of the examples
need to be updated, so the following snippet updated all the examples to
a compatible react version.
```bash
cd examples/
fd -g 'package.json' | xargs sed -r -i 's/"react": ".*"/"react": "^17.0.2"/
fd -g 'package.json' | xargs sed -r -i 's/"react-dom": ".*"/"react-dom": "^17.0.2"/'
# exclude experimental react version
git checkout with-reason-relay/package.json
```
* docs: use descriptive links instead of "click here"
Linking text such as "here" or "click here" is not accessible (and
doesn't look that great either). The best example of why it's better to
use link text that provides context is that some screen readers allow
navigation by links alone. If all links say "click here", then how does
the user know which one to go to?
I tried to make the minimal change necessary to make the link text
descriptive but had to reword a few sentences that didn't read well.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
