The very-newly-released `generateMetadata` function currently does not
allow itself to be synchronous. It leads to situations like this
```ts
export async function generateMetadata() {
return { title: "Hello, world!" };
}
```
where there's evidently no reason to use `async`, but it's forced by
Next.js.
This PR aims to remove this restriction: `generateMetadata` can be
synchronous now.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #45685`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Signed-off-by: Vu Van Dung <me@joulev.dev>
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
This PR changes the loader logic from something like `ctx.hasAppDir ?
useAppLoaderForCSS : usePagesLoaderForCSS`, to a mental modal of
`[ctx.hasAppDir ? useAppLoaderForCSSInAppLayer : null,
usePagesLoaderForCSSInPagesLayer]`. This change makes sure that both
pages and app can exist and work well together, instead of a binary
switch.
Also renamed the loader with `-dev` removed, because it is used for
production build too.
NEXT-461
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Warn users when there's `head.js` being used in `app/`, and recommend to
use metadata. Will show a warning in console while rendering
Closes NEXT-268
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Fixes#44424 by adding the `app` folder to an `ESLINT_DEFAULT_DIRS`
constant which defines all folders where the linter should go through.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fix up a icon convention in #45612, we should pick up the
`apple-icon.<ext>` as this is a shorter path for users to remember.
Also addessing some feedbacks from @shuding in #45612
---------
This PR add supports for a shortcut for adding `icons.icon` or
`icons.apple` metadata for page or layout with static files.
Closes NEXT-263
Closes NEXT-260
If you specific icon.png or apple-touch-icon.png, they will be
automatically picked by and added into metadata as `icon` and
`apple-touch-icon` fields, and replace the `icons` field specified in
page/layout level metadata exports.
File matching rule:
```
icon -> /^icon\d?\.(ico|jpg|png|svg)$/
apple-touch-icon -> /^apple-touch-icon\d?\.(ico|jpg|png|svg)$/
```
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
During build, there's no need to start N workers for type checking and
linting, because there's no concurrency at all for these tasks (both
TypeScript and ESLint are checking all files globally).
During my test of `next build` for a small size project of 5 pages, this
change reduces the peak memory usage by 545MB (as each worker holds a
huge dependency chain). Before (there are too many worker threads
initiated):
<img width="1278" alt="before"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3676859/217116925-5594a45c-f1bb-4d11-8699-f6fe12ce7ee5.png">
After:
<img width="1189" alt="CleanShot-2023-02-07-WfQTnB1D@2x"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3676859/217116940-a08a256e-b80d-4836-8b97-2837c845435e.png">
It improves the CPU usage as well.
In the future we can spin up multiple workers and assign sub-task for
each, but that only makes sense when the number of pages is large.
NEXT-470
It seems this was broken when we changed the source folder.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`]
- [ ] (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Follow-up to #45555. This uses the same handling of mutable for
serverPatchReducer and refreshReducer.
Fixes NEXT-213
Ensures scroll position is still applied when calling `router.push()`
and `router.refresh()` in a single transition:
```tsx
startTransition(() => {
router.push('/dashboard')
router.refresh()
})
```
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Kaifer <jan@kaifer.cz>
## Issue
To address the problem that we introduced in 13.0.7 (#42589) where we thought we could use same implementation `next/dynamic` for both `pages/` and `app/` directory. But it turns out it leads to many problems, such as:
* SSR preloading could miss the content, especially with nested dynamic calls
* Closes#45213
* Introducing suspense boundary into `next/dynamic` with extra wrapped `<Suspense>` outside will lead to content is not resolevd during SSR
* Related #45151
* Closes#45099
* Unexpected hydration errors for suspense boundaries. Though react removed this error but the 18.3 is not out yet.
* Closes#44083
* Closes#45246
## Solution
Separate the dynamic implementation for `app/` dir and `pages/`.
For `app/` dir we can encourage users to:
* Directly use `React.lazy` + `Suspense` for SSR'd content, and `next/dynamic`
* For non SSR components since it requires some internal integeration with next.js.
For `pages/` dir we still keep the original implementation
If you want to use `<Suspense>` with dynamic `fallback` value, use `React.lazy` + `Suspense` directly instead of picking up `next/dynamic`
* Closes#45116
This will solve various issue before react 18.3 is out and let users still progressively upgrade to new versions of next.js.
## Bug Fix
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Bug
- [x] Fixes#42419
---
This PR checks to see if the VSCode setting for `typescript.tsdk` has already been set, and avoids overwriting if so. This is needed for Yarn Berry PNP (and likely other uses) that do not use `./node_modules/typescript/lib` as the path for the Typescript SDK.
Creates a separate handleMutable function that ensures the initial call
and the second call are the same.
This only changes navigateReducer right now but I'll reuse the same
handling for serverPatch and refresh too when this lands.
Additionally found a bug where mpaNavigation was checked incorrectly
with `forceOptimisticNavigation`.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adds additional unit tests.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This field behaves the same as a CSS layers. Where they get added in the order they're discovered. This means that the first discovered one is always the lowest precedence. The stylesheet imported as modules in Webpack are always added first. Which means that they have the lowest precedence. The string `"high"` doesn't make any sense to add first.
We might add ways to add other ones but the string can just be anything. So we'll make it "next.js" to indicate that this is the grouping where all the Next.js styles are added.
If there's an error when hard navigating to a page, the overlay in `packages/react-dev-overlay` is rendered instead of the one in `next`. This can cause you to get stuck if it's a server component because currently `packages/react-dev-overlay` ignores server component change events. This adds a reload for this case. The next step is probably to make sure the `app` overlay is rendered for errors during hard navigations as well.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
In some apps like `vercel/site`; tracing the entries is unnecessary but
is really time/memory consuming. In this case, we should expose an
option to disable tracing the entries.
Closes WEB-523
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
Found a bug with excluding `/_next/static` from Edge Middleware due to
`/_next` being special-cased when deployed and i18n is configured.
```
export const config = {
matcher: [
'/',
'/((?!api|_next/static|favicon|.well-known|auth|sitemap|robots.txt|files).*)',
],
};
```
closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/40305
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [X] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
It's not always an error when this occurred, like you can still import a client boundary from a client component. Although we want to make it a conventional thing so it's more like a warning in the moment.
Thanks to @MaxLeiter's feedback.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds the corresponding TS plugin logic for the `metadata` export
field. In short, it provides the same IntelliSense experience to that
export value even if it isn't typed manually with `Metadata`. It is
implemented via an in-memory TypeScript LanguageServiceHost, that
attaches the `Metadata` type to the original node (if it's not typed by
the user) and handles the actual IntelliSense requests. Our plugin here
only services as a proxy.
That said, in our docs (and even in our JSDoc of metadata), we should
still recommend people to type it manually.
Also note that `generateMetadata` isn't enhanced with this yet.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Refactoring the ugliness of the previous diff into a more manageable
build context. This will let us avoid passing down 10 params at a time.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
During build, entrypoint creation is only useful for the webpack build
process. Since I extracted it to another file, it makes sense to also
move it there.
Note: the way the params are added sucks, this is corrected in the next
diff.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This is a private unused option, I'm removing it to simplify my life
later in this stack.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
I'm looking at potentially extracting the webpack compilation step to another process or thread to isolate memory issues, to do this I need to split the build code a bit. This makes it relatively cleaner but there's a lot more that could be done.
I'm moving the content of the webpack span to another file and also created a shared `NextBuildContext` to hold parameters to be shared. This will be useful as we split more of the file.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Closes NEXT-397
Resolve `metadata` and `generateMetadata()` exports along with head
during rendering, this is the easy way for now to collect all the
metadata properly. Since we can access segment params and search params
only in rendering, so I moved all the resolving logic from loader to
render process.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Adds `data-next-font` data attribute to the preload tag if added by
`@next/font`.
```js
// Using `size-adjust` fallback font.
<link data-next-font="size-adjust" rel="preload" href="..." as="font" type="font/woff2" crossorigin="anonymous">
// Not using `size-adjust` fallback font.
<link data-next-font="" rel="preload" href="..." as="font" type="font/woff2" crossorigin="anonymous">
```
If no fonts are preloaded, the tag is added on the preconnect tag.
Fixes NEXT-350
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adds support for `router.push('https://google.com')`,
`router.replace('https://google.com')`, and
`redirect('https://google.com')`.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This fixes a regression in our source map generating which got lost in
the big diff from the `src` folder restructure in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/44405
These invalid source maps broken plugins that attempted to leverage them
like `@sentry/nextjs` which only attempts in a production environment
15ec85bead/packages/nextjs/src/config/webpack.ts (L586)
For a regression test in a follow-up we will need to investigate a
production test fixture with `@sentry/nextjs` although this requires a
DSN be configured.
This also ensures we setup `unhandledRejection` and `uncaughtException`
listeners during build so that we have proper stack information when
these occur and the process isn't left hanging.
This also moves the `extensionAlias` config from
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/44177 to an experimental config
as it seems to cause conflicts with ESM packages that define `exports`
in their `package.json` which can be considered a breaking change.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/45419
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03DQ3QFV7C/p1674937545579229)
This PR mainly refactors the TS plugin structure and moves things over the typescript/ folder under server/. I created a rules/ folder to separate different kinds of insights, current it covers:
- Intellisense for entries on the server layer:
- Hide autocompletions for disallowed APIs such as `useState`
- Show errors if these are used
- Intellisense for all entires:
- Prop hints such as `params` and `searchParams` for pages, and named slots for layouts
- Error for invalid props
- Intellisense for exported configs:
- Autocompletion and docs for configs
- Hover hints for configs
- Error for invalid configs and extra exports
- Intellisense for client boundary modules
- Warn if `"use client"` isn't on the top of other expressions
- (**new**) Error for unserializable props passed to exported functions
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Preparation for making the mutable shared across the actions.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Allows you to `next build --experimental-app-only` which excludes
`pages` altogether. Useful for quickly debugging while migrating.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
More cleaning / moving code around.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Part of the larger refactor, moving the types around, no functional
changes in this PR.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Related: ff92ab0ac9/src/compiler/types.ts (L6901)
Upstream: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/51901/files#diff-e9fd483341eea176a38fbd370590e1dc65ce2d9bf70bfd317c5407f04dba9560R6890
```shell
> @blocksuite/next-example@ build /Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/packages/react/examples/next
> next build
info - Linting and checking validity of types ..We detected TypeScript in your project and reconfigured your tsconfig.json file for you. Strict-mode is set to false by default.
The following mandatory changes were made to your tsconfig.json:
- moduleResolution was set to node (to match webpack resolution)
warn - TypeScript project references are not fully supported. Attempting to build in incremental mode.
> Build error occurred
Error: Debug Failure. Unexpected moduleResolution: node
at resolveModuleName (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:39044:24)
at Object.resolve (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:114797:47)
at loadWithModeAwareCache (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:114837:40)
at actualResolveModuleNamesWorker (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:115072:126)
at resolveModuleNamesWorker (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:115389:22)
at resolveModuleNamesReusingOldState (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:115541:77)
at processImportedModules (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:117013:29)
at findSourceFileWorker (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:116775:9)
at findSourceFile (/Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:116640:22)
at /Users/himself65/Code/blocksuite/node_modules/.pnpm/typescript@5.0.0-dev.20230125/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js:116589:24 {
type: 'Error'
}
info - Linting and checking validity of types . ELIFECYCLE Command failed with exit code 1.
Process finished with exit code 1
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Additional unit tests for the router reducer.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Ensures this file nests correctly in vscode.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Missed that this one was created with the wrong casing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Noticed that there were some leftover parameters. Removed them as
they're no longer needed.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Adds a test for isNavigatingToNewRootLayout.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Follow up to moving router-reducer. This adds a unit test for injecting
the subTreeData.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adds a simple unit test for `redirect.ts` to test Graphite stacked
changes.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Similar to the other PRs. This adds a test for shouldHardNavigate. It
also removes the `treePatch` variable from the function as it was only
passed around, not used.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
We currently don't make it obvious when next export is being leveraged
and middleware is present which won't work when deployed to a static
host so this ensures we warn the same way we do for API routes.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/vercel/pull/9319
Not all browsers implement the network error message in the same way:
For example if I execute `fetch('//foo.bar/').catch(err =>
console.log(err.message))` in Chrome / Firefox / Safari browsers
console, I get respectively:
- `Failed to fetch`
- `NetworkError when attempting to fetch resource.`
- `Load failed`
This PR fixes it.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using fixes
[#45190](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/45190)
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Right now, when doing the following in an Edge API:
```typescript
export default async () => {
await fetch("https://hello.world");
};
```
The stack trace generated does not contain the actual line of code that caused the error.
This gives a bad developer experience when working with `next dev`.
This PR fixes that for this specific use case and adds a test to make sure there's no regression.
For `next start`, there's also a small change, that needs to be pushed upstream to `edge-runtime`.
In order to run user code in the Edge Runtime, we call `vm.evaluate(code: string)`. However,
if we embrace the `options` from the signature of `vm.runInContext(code, ctx, options)`, we can
pass in the filename so the stack trace is correct.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
This PR ensures that `metadata` and `generateMetadata` are valid exports
for pages and layouts during the TS plugin check.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
fixes NEXT-164
## Context
This PR fixes an issue happening when using `next/image` or `next/link` where rendering them caused sync re-renders with React. This breaks [selective hydration](https://github.com/reactwg/react-18/discussions/130) in React.
## The fix
The cause of this behaviour is that we're calling `setState` in a ref mount, which basically "forces" React to disable concurrent rendering. It finishes the render, runs synchronously the passive effects and re-renders again to make sure that everything is in sync, all of that in without yielding to the browser to paint.
Here in this case, the `setState` call is because of the `useIntersectionObserver` hook. It's implemented in a way that requires the user to call a setter that will store the ref value in a component state variable to re-trigger a render and re-run the effect to create the intersection observer.
This is not necessary as the ref init phase always runs before the passive effect runs, so we can just copy the ref to another ref inside `useIntersectionObserver` without triggering a re-render.
## Before/After
1st screenshot: before
2nd screenshot: after
Basically on the first screenshot, you can see that React is doing a synchronous re-render (see `flushPassiveEffects`). This is not good.
If you look at screenshot 2, you can see it does not happen anymore and that the passive effects are flushed in another block in the flamegraph.
<img width="1110" alt="CleanShot 2023-01-23 at 14 30 11@2x" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/214051860-c42d2849-cd10-4922-a3e0-9b715fc87b23.png">
<img width="520" alt="CleanShot 2023-01-23 at 14 29 01@2x" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/214051555-04adf516-9c0b-4056-ac65-1ef33614c767.png">
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- Add support for scrolling to the sides and down when navigating
- Add tests for vertical scrolling
- Add tests for horizontal scrolling
- Add tests for `router.refresh()`
- should not scroll by itself
- should not block router.push from scrolling
- should not scroll when page refreshed using fash refresh
- Scroll to the top of document if that gets page into viewport
- I didn't want to implement some heuristics on if we can scroll to the top of the page so I just scroll there and check.
- This implementation may not play well with some nested scrollable containers (but that never worked, just FYI)
- Improved typings on `BrowserInterface` a little - backward compatible change.
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
Previously the `React.lazy` and Loadable preloading are creating different module loading promises with loader. Now we change to wait the loader in `React.lazy` to make sure for SSR case they're preloaded. The case to trigger this bug is: When adding `Document.getInitialProps` (aka. gIP), rendering goes to process the gIP first which would make the lazy elements executed before gIP, then preloading will happen after lazy which leads to Suspense resolves too fast without content.
Fixes#45151
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Since we now call `loadConfig()` in various processes our `execOnce`
handling isn't tracking when we have already shown warnings/logs in
another process so this adds a `silent` flag that we can leverage when
calling `loadConfig()`.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Fixes: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1674351677627259)
This PR implements page and layout exported `metadata` field support with limited properties.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
When `appDir` is enabled, `next/dynamic` with `ssr: false` didn't get
correctly compiled with swc. The `server_components` condition in
next_dynamic transform should respect to the server components
compilation, but it was accidently turned on when server components is
enabled.
This PR fixes it that only turn on the flag when it's in server
components compilation (when `is_server` option is `true`)
reported by @MaxLeiter
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
