This commit enables the following patterns in Middleware:
```ts
// with a dot notation
const { ENV_VAR, "ENV-VAR": myEnvVar } = process.env;
// or with an object access
const { ENV_VAR2, "ENV-VAR2": myEnvVar2 } = process["env"];
```
### Related
- @cramforce asked this fixed here: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37514#discussion_r892437257
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
* Refactor data fetching to support getting headers
* Relax `getNextPathnameInfo` type
* Add test for middleware internal redirects
* Export `ParsedRelativeUrl` type
* Refactor `getMiddlewareEffects`
* Move rewrite i18n test to middleware rewrite tests
* Fix bug parsing pathname info
* Normalize data requests to page requests for middleware
* Ensure there is a header `x-nextjs-matched-path` for middleware rewrites on data requests
* Extract `getDataHref` to a function
* Stop using `getDataHref` for flight
* Always set the query in `dataHref` independently of if it is SSG
* Add test for recursive rewrites
* Refactor dynamicPath validation to `matchHrefAndAsPath`
* Add `dataHref` to `FetchDataOutput`
* Extract `matchesMiddleware` function
* Add `hasMiddleware` option to `fetchNextData`
* Move preflight test
* Remove preflight test
* Add middleware prefetch tests
* Remove preflight
* Attempt to reduce bundle size
Include `withMiddlewareEffects` and `matchHrefAndAsPath` into `router`
Bring `getDataHref` back to `page-loader`
Bring `resolveDynamicRoute` back to `router`
* Reduce arg duplication for `withMiddlewareEffects`
* Remove some async/await and spreads to reduce bundle size
* Upgrade `edge-runtime` & clone `Request` on redirects to mutate headers
* Add some rewrite tests
Co-authored-by: Kiko Beats <josefrancisco.verdu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Bug
fixes#37106
Please note that, as for `pages/` the `src/middleware` file is ignored when `/middleware` is present.
## How to test
1. Rebuild next.js `pnpm build`
2. Run dedicated tests: `pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern middleware-src/`
I noticed this line was not used in the standalone server:
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
It would be nice to have this attribute to compare runs with and without the `swcMinify` options.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR will allow Middleware to set its matcher through `export const config = { matching: ... }`
## Related
* This PR is rebased off #37121
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Adopt the new `moduleMap` option added in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/24629, which helps us getting rid of our hacky implementation injected to `globalThis.__next_require__`. The map will be attached to the flight manifest as `__ssr_module_mapping__`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Feature
This PR introduces the ability to provide `runtime: "edge"` in API endpoints, the same as the experimental RSC runtime configurations.
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Router context should be treated as rsc shared dep otherwise client component won't receive the instance in edge runtime
## Bug
- [x] Integration tests added
This refactors the `incremental-cache` and moves the file-system cache handling to it's own cache handler allowing it to be replaced by a custom cache handler (experimental).
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/22619
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Do not exclude internal _next request in middleware
* Allow for `NextURL` to parse prefetch requests
* Add test for middleware data prefetch
* Refactor `hasBasePath` and `replaceBasePath`
* Refactor `removeTrailingSlash`
* Refactor parsed next url to use `getNextPathnameInfo`
* Allow to configure `NextURL`
* Ensure middleware rewrites with always with a locale
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Another strategy to do achieve the goal of #36995. With this PR the module IDs will be:
- (1) RSC: named (_this one doesn't matter_)
- (2) SSR: named
- (3) Client: deterministic
And we include the client module IDs in the flight manifest, as well as an extra mapping of 3) → 2) so during SSR it can require the correct module still.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Follow-up PR for #37134, this PR adds back the hash in each chunk's filename. This `chunks` in the flight manifest will now be `chunkId:chunkFilename` with this PR, and `globalThis.__next_chunk_load__` then handles the chunk registration (uses chunkId) and chunk loading (uses chunkFilename). (Q: how can we port this to React?)
We can't use `[contenthash]` but only `[chunkhash]` because at the stage of generating the flight manifest, the content isn't finalized and the hash changes after that.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR makes sure that chunks of client components can be loaded via `__webpack_chunk_load__`, and hydrated correctly inside `viewsDir`.
Side note: we have to get rid of `[contenthash]` from the chunk filename because of a conflict currently which can be resolved later.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
The PR fixes#37122, an issue introduced by #37105.
`next.config.js` might/will include functions (custom `webpack`, `generateBuildId`, `exportPathsMap`, etc.) that are not able to pass from the main thread to a worker. The PR fixes the issue by only passing primitive args to the worker.
This PR removes the not-very-helpful stack trace when sass is being used but the npm package is not installed. Fixes#13975
- Fix behavior to show the modified error message if either node-sass OR sass is missing
- dispose of stack trace if the condition above passes
- update the error link to [err.sh](https://err.sh/next.js/install-sass) equivalent
- update the relevant test to verify the stack trace is omitted and to account for the new link
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #13975`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Linked to issue #32209.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation
The purpose of this PR is to enable Trusted Types compatibility in Webpack. When the app is run in development mode, Webpack is currently set to use an [eval-source-map](5a16b1a26f/packages/next/build/webpack/config/blocks/base.ts (L33)). This source map involves passing raw strings to `eval()` calls, which raise Trusted Types violations. The solution to this problem is to set `webpack5Config.output.trustedTypes` in the Webpack config. As shown in the documentation [here](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/output/#outputtrustedtypes), setting this value to a string will create a Trusted Types policy with the specified name. By creating a policy within Webpack, the raw strings passed to the `eval()` calls will be promoted to be of type `TrustedScript`. The issue where this was addressed in Webpack can be found [here](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/14075).
### Note:
The policy name that is set in the Webpack config is currently `nextjs#bundler`. Once it is released to the public and application developers begin using it, it may be harder to change the value since any application developers with a custom policy name allowlist would now need to update their next.config.js headers to allow this new name. Thus, a good name should ideally be determined before this pull request is merged. The reason that `nextjs#bundler` is preferred over `nextjs#webpack` is in case Next.js moves to a different bundler in the future. Having a generic name would allow for application developers to keep their next.config.js file the same after the bundler switch has occurred. If a different name is preferred, feel free to comment what that would be.
The code was tested in a sample application to ensure it behaved as expected.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
We added custom _app as server component support in #33149, but we found it's pretty confusing on usage like support it both server component pages and regular pages at the same time for having similar layout purpose.
When using the _app.server and _app at the same time, applying them into proper places become more confusing.
In that case, we decide to make _app.js can't be a server component, and you can still keep all the existing thing there. And also you don't need to think of the corresponding APIs of custom _app in RSC
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Docs updated
_Hello Next.js team! First PR here, I hope I've followed the right practices._
### What's in there?
It has been decided to only support the following uses cases in Next.js' middleware:
- rewrite the URL (`x-middleware-rewrite` response header)
- redirect to another URL (`Location` response header)
- pass on to the next piece in the request pipeline (`x-middleware-next` response header)
1. during development, a warning on console tells developers when they are returning a response (either with `Response` or `NextResponse`).
2. at build time, this warning becomes an error.
3. at run time, returning a response body will trigger a 500 HTTP error with a JSON payload containing the detailed error.
All returned/thrown errors contain a link to the documentation.
This is a breaking feature compared to the _beta_ middleware implementation, and also removes `NextResponse.json()` which makes no sense any more.
### How to try it?
- runtime behavior: `HEADLESS=true yarn jest test/integration/middleware/core`
- build behavior : `yarn jest test/integration/middleware/build-errors`
- development behavior: `HEADLESS=true yarn jest test/development/middleware-warnings`
### Notes to reviewers
The limitation happens in next's web adapter. ~The initial implementation was to check `response.body` existence, but it turns out [`Response.redirect()`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/server/web/spec-compliant/response.ts#L42-L53) may set the response body (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31886). Hence why the proposed implementation specifically looks at response headers.~
`Response.redirect()` and `NextResponse.redirect()` do not need to include the final location in their body: it is handled by next server https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/server/next-server.ts#L1142
Because this is a breaking change, I had to adjust several tests cases, previously returning JSON/stream/text bodies. When relevant, these middlewares are returning data using response headers.
About DevEx: relying on AST analysis to detect forbidden use cases is not as good as running the code.
Such cases are easy to detect:
```js
new Response('a text value')
new Response(JSON.stringify({ /* whatever */ })
```
But these are false-positive cases:
```js
function returnNull() { return null }
new Response(returnNull())
function doesNothing() {}
new Response(doesNothing())
```
However, I see no good reasons to let users ship middleware such as the one above, hence why the build will fail, even if _technically speaking_, they are not setting the response body.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
The Edge SSR server and the client bundle should share the same Styled JSX instance to ensure the context can be passed correctly, same with the way we handle `next/head`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR deprecates declaring a middleware under `pages` in favour of the project root naming it after `middleware` instead of `_middleware`. This is in the context of having a simpler execution model for middleware and also ships some refactor work. There is a ton of a code to be simplified after this deprecation but I think it is best to do it progressively.
With this PR, when in development, we will **fail** whenever we find a nested middleware but we do **not** include it in the compiler so if the project is using it, it will no longer work. For production we will **fail** too so it will not be possible to build and deploy a deprecated middleware. The error points to a page that should also be reviewed as part of **documentation**.
Aside from the deprecation, this migrates all middleware tests to work with a single middleware. It also splits tests into multiple folders to make them easier to isolate and work with. Finally it ships some small code refactor and simplifications.
## What's in there?
Partially fixes https://github.com/vercel/edge-functions/issues/82
Relates to #36715
Our webpack plugin for middleware leverages static analysis to detect Dyanamic code evaluation in user `_middleware.js` file (and depedencies). Since edge function runtime do not allow them, the build is aborted.
The use of `Function.bind` is considered invalid, while it is legit. A customer using `@aws-sdk/client-s3` reported it.
This PR fixes it.
Please note that this check is too strict: some dynamic code may be in the bundle (despite treeshaking), but may never be used (because of code branches). Since this point is under discussion, this PR adds tests covering some false positives (`@apollo/react-hook`, `qs` and `has`), but does not change the behavior (consider them as errors).
## Notes to reviewer
I looked for test facilities allowing to download the required 3rd party modules. `createNext()` in production context made my day, but showed two issues:
- `cliOutput` is not cleaned in between tests. While clearance during `stop()` would be annoying, I hope that clearance during `start()` is better.
- if `start()` fails while building, the created instance can never be stopped. This is because we don't clear `childProcess` after `build`.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Implements the first part of #33227
- Applies browserslist to JS transforms when `experimental.browsersListForSwc` is enabled.
- You don't have to use browserslist, there's also `legacyBrowsers: false` which will be the new default in Next.js 13. See #33227 for which browsers and why. `legacyBrowsers` requires `browsersListForSwc: true` to function until it is the default.
```js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
legacyBrowsers: false,
browsersListForSwc: true,
}
}
```
I only implemented the JS part of the RFC, the CSS part should be handled in a follow-up PR.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
