This PR updates a few features from experimental to stable status:
- `next/future/image` component
- `remotePatterns` configuration
- `unoptimized` configuration
This PR updates the `next/future/image` component so that CSS `filter` is never needed. Previously, we used SVG to blur for prod and CSS to blur for dev, but now we use SVG for both.
This required a shared function `getImageBlurSvg()` used between both client and server because `next dev` doesn't create Data URIs and instead defers blur generation until request time. So we also need to defer svg generation to request time (on the server) during next dev.
This is the first step to removing `<noscript>` completely (see #39736).
This PR is a follow up to PR #39190 so that we can dynamically set the `feComponentTransfer` when we know the image doesn't have transparency (at this time its just jpeg).
We also set the stdDeviation to 1 and the viewbox to the placeholder's width/height to avoid any rounding issues.
Finally, we also fix the conversion from `objectPosition` to `backgroundPosition` because they have different default values according to the spec.
Follow-up to the earlier enabling of classes/variables etc.
Bug
Related issues linked using fixes #number
Integration tests added
Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md
Feature
Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
Related issues linked using fixes #number
Integration tests added
Documentation added
Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md
Documentation / Examples
Make sure the linting passes by running pnpm lint
The examples guidelines are followed from our contributing doc
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
We were resizing animated images when importing them, but we don't optimize images when they come from an upstream provider. For consistency, we can skip resizing for local animated images as well.
Fixes#39317
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR corrects a mistake where a negative number could pass, as a number greater than 0.
This is due to negative numbers being a truthy value in JS.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
In a previous PR (#34075), the ISR behavior was introduced to the Image Optimization API, however it changed the cache-control header to always set maxage=0. While this is probably the right behavior (the client shouldn't cache the image), it introduced a regression for users who have CDNs in front of a single Next.js instance (as opposed to [multiple Next.js instances](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching/incremental-static-regeneration#self-hosting-isr)).
Furthermore, the pros of client-side caching outweight the cons because its easy to change the image url (add querystring param for example) to invalidate the cache.
This PR reverts the cache-control behavior until we can come up with a better long-term solution.
- Fixes#35987
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
- Closes#35596
## Description
This PR implements a new configuration object in `next.config.js` called `experimental.images.remotePatterns`.
This will eventually deprecate `images.domains` because it covers the same use cases and more by allowing wildcard pattern matching on `hostname` and `pathname` and also allows restricting `protocol` and `port`.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request.
- [x] Related issues linked
- [x] Unit tests added
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Related
- Fixes#27925
- Closes#18429
- Closes#18632
- Closes#18730
- Closes#27345
This gracefully handles errors when the `url` query string param looks like an internal image because it starts with `/` but it is not pointing to an internal image.
Previously, this was printing an unnecessary stack trace when the upstream content-type was undefined.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This ensures we handle `EEXISTS` with `fs.rmdir` for Node.js `v12` and use `fs.rm` when available instead as it is the replacement for `fs.rmdir` with the `recursive` option.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33860#issuecomment-1035676729
When an invalid image is requested, the 'finish' event is never triggered,
which ultimately leads to a 504 Gateway Timeout error.
This is fixed by invoking the 'callback' in `_write()`.
fix https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33441
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Adds base http classes, along with Node + Web (partial) implementations
Removes usage of IncomingMessage and ServerResponse from base server
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
This ensures we trace the `image-optimizer` for the standalone output mode as previously this was always ignored under the assumption image optimizing would be handled at the CDN level in standalone mode.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32513
Generally, AVIF quality can be lower compared to WebP so we can adjust this for the user so that it looks roughly the same depending on if the browser supports AVIF or WebP.
- Fixes#31254
- Related to https://github.com/lovell/sharp/issues/2850
This will ensure an image hashed consistently regardless of how its imported:
- `import file from "./file.png"` -> /_next/static/media/file.12345678.png
- `url(./file.png)` -> /_next/static/media/file.12345678.png
- `new URL("./file.png", import.meta.url)` -> /_next/static/media/file.12345678.png
This ensures we prefix the `src` for static images with the `basePath` correctly, this also copies over the static image tests to the basePath image-component suite.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29289
fixes#27210
maybe related: #19668
currently, the image optimizer returns 400 when an image url contains non-ascii characters. this pr uri-encodes the `url` query parameter to fix it. also see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/27210#issuecomment-890305204
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
In this PR I've added the `Content-Disposition` header to the response of the image `/_next/image` route. That header is used by the browser when showing the dialog for the `Save image as...` action.
There are some differences between the browsers, ex:
When requesting the image `test.jpg`, the response header `Content-Type: image/webp` - in FF the filename from the `Save image as...` dialog would be `test.webp` but in Chrome `test.jpg` even if the `Content-Disposition: inline; filename="test.webp"` is present in the headers. The same about png images, the rest types are fine. It looks like FF is checking the `Content-Type` for the extension but the Chrome does not and is doing another type of check.
Fixes#26737
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
* Use sharp for image transformations when available
* Refactor resizeImage and add sharp warning
* only show sharp warning once per instance
* Modify sharp error message
* Add documentation for optional sharp dependency
* Update docs/basic-features/image-optimization.md
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Import types for sharp
* Update lockfile
* Add testing against sharp
* use fs-extra for node 12
* Rename test sharp path variable
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* update squoosh specific test
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* update tests
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
In a previous PR (#27200), we added `minimumCacheTTL` to configure the time-to-live for the cached image. However, this was setting the `max-age` header.
This PR ensures that `minimumCacheTTL` doesn't affect browser caching, only the upstream header can affect browser caching.
This is a bit safer in case the developer accidentally caches something that shouldn't be and the cache needs to be invalidated. Simply delete the `.next/cache/images` directory.
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
* Add x-forward headers to external rewrites
This commit configures the proxy used for external rewrites to include
x-forward headers [1]. This is particularly useful for incremental
adoption, where some routes will be handled by Next.js and others by a
different website. For example, a Rails app will use the
X-Forwarded-Host header to determine which host to use for URL
generation and redirects [2].
[1]: 91fee3e943/lib/http-proxy.js (L31)
[2]: 41139f6ba2/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/http/url.rb (L221-L227)
* Handle image-optimizer case
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
- Closes#23328
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This PR changes the implementation of `placeholder=blur` when using `next dev` so that it lazy loads on-demand.
This will improve the developer experience for web apps with many blurred images.
This pull request adds "Vary: Accept" header to responses from the image optimizer (i.e. the /_next/image endpoint).
The image optimizer prefers re-encoding JPG files to WebP, but some browsers (such as Safari 14 on Catalina) do not yet support WebP. In such cases the optimizer uses the Accept header sent by the browser to send out a JPG response. Thus the optimizer's response may depend on the Accept header.
Potential caching proxies can be informed of this fact by adding "Vary: Accept" to the response headers. Otherwise WebP data may be served to browsers that do not support it, for example in the following scenario:
* A browser that supports WebP requests the JPG. The optimizer re-encodes it to WebP. The proxy caches the WebP data.
* After this another browser that doesn't support WebP requests the JPG. The proxy sends the WebP data to the browser.
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This solves the main use case from Issue #19914.
Previously, we would set the `Cache-Control` header to a constant and rely on the server cache. This would mean the browser would always request the image and the server could response with 304 Not Modified to omit the response body.
This PR changes the behavior such that the `max-age` will propagate from the upstream server to the Next.js Image Optimization Server and allow browser caching. ("upstream" meaning external server or just an internal route to an image)
This PR does not change the `max-age` for static imports which will remain `public, max-age=315360000, immutable`.
#### Pros:
- Fewer HTTP requests after initial browser visit
- User configurable `max-age` via the upstream image `Cache-Control` header
#### Cons:
- ~~Might be annoying for `next dev` when modifying a source image~~ (solved: use `max-age=0` for dev)
- Might cause browser to cache longer than expected (up to 2x longer than the server cache if requested in the last second before expiration)
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
