Fixes#41995Closes#43144
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Bruno Nascimento <bruno.hn@icloud.com>
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/43001
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This PR exposes internal injection point to specify custom binary /
bindings for the turbopack. It doesn't affect any existing native
bindings (swc), but only allows to run custom turbopack
(`turbo.startDev`) if specified.
The changes are mostly for the internal dev / testing iteration purpose.
Currently, the workflow to test new turbopack changes in next.js is
- update next-swc's cargo to point to specific changes in turbopack
- rebuild, specify next.js to use local binary
This requires additional build times (turbopack build cannot be used,
have to rebuild next-swc napi bindings) as well as if we'd like to try
some changes on the CI between next.js canary + latest turbopack,
integration gets bit tricky. 2 env variable is exposed for the purpose -
`__INTERNAL_CUSTOM_TURBOPACK_BINARY` stands for the executable binary
(next-dev) can be built in turbopack,
`__INTERNAL_CUSTOM_TURBOPACK_BINDINGS` stands for the custom napi
bindings if needed. Both are strictly internal as name implies. There
won't be any documentation, no semver guarantee or else. Current plan is
to execute some subset of next.js test on turbopack PRs with these
entrypoints.
Feature / security wise these are mostly harmless I believe - this is
devserver usually don't run on CI, and trying to print out warning if
flag is enabled.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This PR fixes `--turbo` can shallow some of unhandled exception, trying
to catch and proceed as much as it can.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42255
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02HEJASXGD/p1667173179573409?thread_ts=1667165920.338789&channel=C02HEJASXGD&message_ts=1667173179.573409)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Ensures we handle the `configFileName` field properly from
`next.config.js`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/41920
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Bug
Minor fix to --turbo to not to suppress errors thrown from bindings.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This addresses a bug where invoking `next dev` or `next start` with `--port 0` would fall back to the default port of 3000 instead of binding to port 0 (which typically results in the operating system assigning a free port).
I couldn't find a straightforward way of adding a test for next-start. It looks like we could add a similar test as for dev, but would need to generate a built project to serve.
Manual test plan for `next start`:
```
$ ./packages/next/dist/bin/next start --port 0
ready - started server on 0.0.0.0:53508, url: http://localhost:53508
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Wyatt Johnson <accounts+github@wyattjoh.ca>
Fixes: #38232
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/36893
Version [12.1.1-canary.5](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v12.1.1-canary.5) introduced a bug, more specifically this PR: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34836
The issue described in #38232 is that the following code starts both the dev and prod servers:
```js
const start = require('next/dist/cli/next-start')
start.nextStart()
```
I searched a bit and found that `lib/get-project-dir.ts#getProjectDir()` now imports `bin/next.ts`
6b8e499c7b/packages/next/lib/get-project-dir.ts (L3)
and it calls a CLI command via
6b8e499c7b/packages/next/bin/next.ts (L137)
This `command` should not be defined, but it fallbacks to `defaultCommand`, which is `dev` (that explains why the dev server is also started)
This PR moves the `cliCommand` types and `commands` variable to a new separate file instead of `bin/next.ts`, to avoid running a CLI command when we import any file that also imports `lib/get-project-dir.ts`
Not sure how integration tests can be added for this issue, but feel free to tell me.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes: #36569
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
The [correct](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/et-cetera-etc/) way to use et cetera is to put a period right after and a comma behind it if it's being used as a list. I updated the occurrences in the docs and examples that didn't match these rules.
A middleware can work as a proxy intercepting requests and then performing a `fetch` to the destination adding headers to the request / response as a "man in the middle". When using `fetch` from a middleware we are not in the context of a browser so we can't really use relative URLs, they must be always absolute.
Now consider the previous case when middleware is running in *server mode*. Typically in order to know the host where we are fetching we can use the `request.nextUrl` which is given to the middleware but in this case the invoker (which is next-server) has no context of the hostname, nor the port. To solve this use case we must make the invoker of the middleware aware of the origin hostname and port.
This PR:
- Introduces `hostname` and `port` as options for `NextServer`.
- Refactors types in `NextServer` and `NextDevServer` moving type only imports to the top of the file.
- Refactors `startServer` to do a best guess on the `hostname` and `port`, passing them down.
- Exposes `.port` and `.hostname` to be retrieved from the `app`.
In an upcoming PR we will pass the host guess to the middleware to solve the relative URL issue.
* Automatically using different port to start dev server for non-explicit port
* return correct port
* more reasonable changes
* fix isExplicitPort
* 1. rename isExplicitPort to allowRetry 2.restrict the number of retries
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
- Enables excludeDefaultMomentLocales by default
- Adds distDir cleaning (See RFC #6009)
- Adds support for `PORT`
- Removes `router.events` from the server-side router as it should not be used server-side (long-standing todo that is potentially breaking). Note that it's still available as `Router.events` (import Router from 'next/router') and with `useRouter` in `useEffect`. Using it with `useEffect` is the correct way and I've updated the upgrading guide to reflect that
- Added webpack 5 to the upgrading guide
- Removed `Head.rewind` as it's been a no-op since Next.js 9.5 and can now be safely removed from user code
Fixes#11408Fixes#10338Fixes#5554
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Fixes#15928
---
This would cause us to print the message too early and open the browser to a server that wasn't started yet. This waits until we're listening, but before the app is ready fully.
* Run prettier over packages/**/*.js
* Run prettier over packages/**/*.ts
* Run prettier over examples
* Remove tslint
* Run prettier over examples
* Run prettier over all markdown files
* Run prettier over json files