In #38647, @balazsorban44 has migrated the rule `no-img-element` to
typescript. The PR follows #38647 by migrating the entire
`eslint-plugin-next` to use typescript. Note it is still possible to
write new rules in javascript.
The PR does the following things:
- Migrates all `utils` to typescript
- All previous JSDoc are also converted to the type definitions
- Creates a utility method `defineRule`
- This is a stub function to provide the type check ability.
- With the `defineRule` we don't have to tediously import type
definition `Rule.RuleMetaData` and `Rule.RuleModule['create']` from
`eslint` anymore, `defineRule` will provide auto-complete and
typechecking for `meta` and `create`.
- Migrates all rules to typescript
- Extra type guards are also added to make typescript happy.
All existing `eslint-config-next` unit test cases passed after the
migration.
Follow-up on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38534#pullrequestreview-1035020450
This lets us use modern JS/TS syntax in ESLint rules and avoid issues like #38530 and #36693
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#33072
I documented all `esXXX` features to be sure that they were already polyfilled. Only `es2019` feature `Object.fromEntries` is not already polyfilled by nextjs.
I added some unwanted polyfill (that are polyfilled by nextjs).
I kept the `es5`, `es6` and `es2015` "as-is" as they contain functions that does not seem to be explicitly polyfilled (all `Math` functions or `Date.now` for example) in the [polyfill file](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/master/packages/next-polyfill-nomodule/src/index.js)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#38530
Should we consider adding a build-step to lint rules to be able to use TS/modern JS?
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Adds tests to ensure `eslint-plugin-next`'s available rules are properly exported and recommended rules are defined correctly.
* Condenses imports.
* Sets default recommended value.
* replace Object.hasOwn for node 14
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Readds `@next/next/no-assign-module-variable` ESLint rule that was inadvertently removed in #34335 during the resolution of many merge conflicts.
This PR will get us back to a good / working state. I'll see if I can add a test to ensure all rule are accounted for in a separate PR.
Fixes#34335.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This rule was good and kinda made sense when we had nested Middleware.
Now that we have a single Middleware, one might extract logic into different places
and I don't think we should limit importing `NextResponse` or `NextRequest`.
## Related
- Closes#36239
- Closes#37309
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
