<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
-->
### What?
Adding support for supporting a custom fontFamily name when using
next/font
### Why?
By default, next/font hashes the font name when generating css to
achieve proper scoping.
However, that makes it impossible to use next/font with 3rd party
libraries that provide CSS with pre-defined font names.
### How?
To solve this, I've added a new argument to the next/font function call
– `usedFontFamilyName`.
It allows developers to pick the fontFamily name that is going to be
used in the CSS output instead of the default one and make it work with
vendor CSS files.
```
import { Inter } from "next/font/google";
const inter = Inter({
subsets: ["latin"],
fixedFontFamily: "Inter",
});
```
Fixes [#43452](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/43452)
---
Edit:
I've changed the implementation to use `disabledFontFamilyHashing`
boolean flag which removes the hashing but keeps the original font
family name instead of allowing a custom name
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
### What
Remove `missingSuspenseWithCSRBailout` and always treate the conditions
where it was used as `true`.
### Why
This was an intended behavior introduced in 14.1, which requires users
to always add suspense boundaries if it's using any hook that could bail
out to client rendering. `missingSuspenseWithCSRBailout` as `true` was
the default behavior and you could disable it with
`missingSuspenseWithCSRBailout: false` in next config. Now after the
removal you will not be able to opt-out it.
Adding some tests based on this Twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/NicoloRibaudo/status/1788919867002785984
Here's what I found:
- Added a new test suite testing for:
- Private fields
- Turbopack: Works
- Webpack: Works on latest
- Earlier versions of Next.js with Webpack you'd see an error failing to
parse coming from `acorn`, which webpack uses internally.
- Verified it's not failing on `next@latest` in [this
sandbox](https://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/brave-mcnulty-gszh3q?file=%2Fapp%2Fpage.tsx%3A59%2C32).
- `import` `with { type: 'json' }`
- Turbopack: Works
- Webpack: Works
- `export as` I.e. `export { x as abc }`
- Turbopack: Works
- Webpack: Works
- RegExp with `/v`
- Node.js: ⚠️ Not enabled in the test because Node.js does not support
it currently in 18.x which we run tests against.
- Turbopack: Works
- Webpack: Fails in Webpack currently on `acorn` parsing the JavaScript
## Results
In case you want to play with the test here's a codesandbox with the
same code that is in the tests:
- `next@latest`: https://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/brave-mcnulty-gszh3q
- Url: https://gszh3q-3000.csb.app/
Dev: Webpack
```
PASS test/e2e/app-dir/ecmascript-features/ecmascript-features.test.ts
ecmascript-features
✓ should work using cheerio
✓ should work using browser
```
Build: Webpack
```
PASS test/e2e/app-dir/ecmascript-features/ecmascript-features.test.ts
ecmascript-features
✓ should work using cheerio
✓ should work using browser
```
Dev: Turbopack
```
PASS test/e2e/app-dir/ecmascript-features/ecmascript-features.test.ts
ecmascript-features
✓ should work using cheerio
✓ should work using browser
```
Build: Turbopack
```
PASS test/e2e/app-dir/ecmascript-features/ecmascript-features.test.ts
ecmascript-features
✓ should work using cheerio
✓ should work using browser
```
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Remove font loaders resolving for `@next/font`, users should directly
rely on `next/font`, they're intended to be removed.
Also removed the legacy tests
When a server action performs a redirect, we send an RSC request to the
redirect URL so that everything can be handled in a single roundtrip.
However, we forward the `next-action` header to that request. This means
that the intra-app RSC request will be incorrectly associated with an
action, and any rewrites we do for `next-action` requests (such as the
work in the Next.js builder to ensure actions are routed to streaming
outputs) won't be handled correctly.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
## What
Ensures `nonce` is added to script and link tags Next.js renders.
Additional cases it now handles:
- We already passed `nonce` to the React rendering, though not
consistently on all cases where `renderToStream` is called, I'm
surprised there haven't been more reports of this, but now it will pass
it on all cases where React rendering is called that I could find
- In `get-layer-assets.tsx` we now pass `nonce` to both the `script` and
`link` tags
- When calling `ReactDOM.preload` the nonce was missing as well, ensured
that the nonce is included in that case as well.
Added a test that mimicks the reproduction by adding `next/font` in this
case.
Fixes#64037
Closes PACK-2973
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What
Remove the auto appending `.xml` extension to the sitemap routes when
it's a dynamic route.
### Why
Previously we were adding `.xml` to `/[...paths/]sitemap` routes, but
the bad part is when you use it to generate multiple sitemaps with
`generateSitemaps` in format like `/[...paths/]sitemap.xml/[id]`, which
doesn't look good in url format and it can be inferred as xml with
content-type. Hence we don't need to add `.xml` in the url.
Before this change it could also result into the different url between
dev and prod:
dev: `/sitemap.xml/[id]`
prod: `/sitemap/[id].xml`
Now it's going to be aligned as `/sitemap/[id]`. Users can add extension
flexiblely.
Closes NEXT-3357
This test failed in dev. It has 2 problems:
1. the nanoid only contains named export
2. we should wait for the content changed then check the browser url
```
● app-dir action handling › fetch actions › should handle redirects to routes that provide an
invalid RSC response
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: "http://localhost:50473/pages-dir"
Received: "http://localhost:50473/client"
891 |
892 | await retry(async () => {
> 893 | expect(await browser.url()).toBe(`${next.url}/pages-dir`)
```
Closes NEXT-3369
### What
Follow up for #64294 where we could preload all the JS and CSS chunks
for `next/dynamic` component.
* Rename `preload-css` component to `preload-chunks` and remove the
filter for css chunks
* Preload JS chunks with `defer`
### Why
Preloading all the async chunks of `next/dynamic` can make rendering
more efficiently when combined with the initial chunks. Since those
chunks are splitted on client but still essential for the page
#### After vs Before
We can see the waterfall starts much earlier for the dynamic chunk
(881.8a0e88...js)
<img width="500"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/9bab2c32-37c3-4c7a-93e2-3aa43b2ec7c8">
<img width="500"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/0fba7499-bb69-41c4-ab72-e9952f3d7f68">
### What?
make sure children is first in loader tree to fix head css bug on client
navigation
### Why?
### How?
Fixes PACK-3028
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
### What
Support `esmExternals` working in app router
### Why
`esmExternals` was disabled for app router that most of the packages are
picking up the CJS bundles for externals. This PR enables to resolve the
ESM bundle for external packages.
We have two issues discovered while enabling the flag, any esm external
packages will fail in client page SSR and server action. We fixed them
by changing the below bundling logics:
* When a client page having a async dependency, we can await the page
during in rendering
* When a server action having a async dependency, we changed the server
action entry creation with webpack along with the server client entry
creation together, then webpack can handle the modules async propagation
properly.
Fixes#60756
Closes NEXT-2435
Closes NEXT-2472
Closes NEXT-3225
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
This PR promotes and renames experimental configuration options related
to server bundling:
- `serverComponentsExternalPackages` -> `serverExternalPackages`
- `bundlePagesExternals` -> `bundlePagesRouterDependencies`
Existing docs for `serverComponentsExternalPackages` was changed.
New docs for `bundlePagesRouterDependencies` were added.
Closes NEXT-3332
Enabling Partial Prerendering (PPR) for an entire application is
ideally, the goal for teams wanting to test out the feature or adopt it
in their applications to get ready for when it becomes the default
rendering pattern. For large applications, with many routes the new
behaviours of old API's may prove a difficult pill to swallow all at
once.
This aims to enable incremental adoption of PPR for pages and routes
that want to support it in a similar way to how existing segment-level
configurations. Segments can now add:
```ts
export const experimental_ppr = true
```
To enable PPR for that segment and those descending segments. Any subset
of those routes that have it enabled can add:
```ts
export const experimental_ppr = false
```
<details>
<summary>An aside on the choice of <code>experimental_ppr</code>
name</summary>
<blockquote>
<p>It is against common JS semantics to use snake-case, and preference
is given to camel-case instead. The choice to make this snake-case was
to re-enforce that this is an experimental feature, an ugly incremental
path, and ideally, developers should aim to remove all references of it
from their codebase.</p>
<p>Additionally, this mirrors what we've done for unstable API's like
`unstable_cache`.</p>
</blockquote>
</details>
To disable PPR for that segment and those descending segments. To use
this new option, the `experimental.ppr` configuration in
`next.config.js` must be set to `"incremental"`:
```js
// next.config.js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
ppr: "incremental",
},
}
```
If a segment does not export a `experimental_ppr` boolean, it is
inferred from it's parent. If no parent has it defined, it's default
value is `false` and therefore disabled.
Once all your segments have PPR enabled via this config, it would be
considered safe for teams to set their `experimental.ppr` value in the
`next.config.js` to `true`, enabling it for the entire app and for all
future routes.
### Aside
I also took the liberty to rename `isPPR` and `supportsPPR` to be the
clearer `isAppPPREnabled` and `isRoutePPREnabled`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hendrik Liebau <mail@hendrik-liebau.de>
When `notFound()` is thrown from metadata, it's caught by a
`<MetadataOutlet />` rendered as a sibling to the page component. But we
currently only pass the custom not-found component to the
`<NotFoundBoundary />` for the `children` slot. This means that if a
parallel route throws a `notFound()` in `generateMetadata`, it'd be
caught by the root not found, which would be unexpected.
This mirrors the logic for determining whether or not a `notFound`
boundary should be provided. A side effect of this is that if you throw
a `notFound()` in `generateMetadata` for a segment that _only_ has
parallel routes, and no `children` slot, it won't be caught by the
boundary. But fixing this will require a larger refactor.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-3320
### Why?
`polyfill-nomodule.js` is a pre-built file containing polyfills for
older browsers (gated by the `<script>` tag `nomodule` attribute).
### How?
- The turbopack server needs to emit a raw OutputAsset for this file, so
that it is copied into the output chunks directory.
- That file needs to be passed into `polyfillFiles`, and preserved when
we're merging manifests inside of the development server.
### Test Plan
```
HEADLESS=true pnpm testonly-dev test/e2e/app-dir/app/index.test.ts -t 'should serve polyfills for browsers that do not support modules'
HEADLESS=true pnpm testonly-dev-turbo test/e2e/app-dir/app/index.test.ts -t 'should serve polyfills for browsers that do not support modules'
```
Build a project with `next dev --turbo` and inspect:
Verify that the polyfill file exists and resolves in the browser.
Closes PACK-2993
This should fix the following scenarios,
- Given a page defined like `app/foo/[...bar]/page.tsx`
- Given a page defined like `app/bar/[[...foo]]/page.tsx`
- Given a parallel route defined like `app/@slot/[...catchall]/page.tsx`
If you navigate to `/foo/bar` the `params` prop in the parallel route
would be
```js
params: {
catchall: [
'foo',
[ 'bar' ]
]
}
```
And if you navigate to `/bar/foo` the `params` prop in the parallel
route would be
```js
params: {
catchall: [
'bar',
'[ ...foo ]'
]
}
```
With the fix in place, the `params` prop in the parallel route will be,
```js
params: {
catchall: [
'foo',
'bar',
]
}
```
And
```js
params: {
catchall: [
'bar',
'foo',
]
}
```
Respectively
Fixes an issue with https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/65063 where
the catch-all param only contains dynamic segments and is missing
non-dynamic route segments.
This makes building breadcrumbs extremely hard as we're missing
information to properly render the correct breadcrumb components.
This fix makes parallel route catch-all params behave like the standard
catch-all params in non-parallel routes
---------
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
### What
Follow up for #62873
Only apply credentials in metadata manifest tag for preview deployment
### Why
When the CORS header is "\*" and if you're including credentials in
request it will block by browser. For manifest's case, if it's fetching
from a publich CDN with responsing the CORS header "\*" and mismatching
with the current website domain it will get blocked. Previously we
introduced that change mostly for vercel deployment auth protection, now
we're going to check if it's preview deployment and also the same
origin, if yes then we'll include credentails for manifest request
Closes NEXT-3208
### What
Removing the Suspense boundary on top of `next/dynamic` by default, make
it as `React.lazy` component with preloading CSS feature.
### Why
Extra Suspense boundary is causing extra useless rendering. For SSR, it
shouldn't render `loading` by default
Related: #64060
Related: #64687
Closes
[NEXT-3074](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-3074/app-router-content-flickering-with-reactcreatecontext-and-nextdynamic)
This is sort of a breaking change, since removing the Suspense boundary
on top of `next/dynamic` by default. If there's error happening in side
the dynamic component you need to wrap an extra Suspense boundary on top
of it
### What
When a page throws a `notFound()` error in `generateMetadata`, and the
page contains parallel route(s), an unhandled runtime error would be
thrown rather than displaying the not found page.
### Why
We use the `<MetadataOutlet />` component to throw any errors caught
during metadata resolution once the metadata is rendered by React so
that it can be caught by an error boundary, so that it doesn't throw
during metadata resolution. A promise is tracked & resolved with an
error once the metadata tree is rendered. Once the promise resolves, the
outlet component will throw.
However, every `__PAGE__` segment that would be rendered as part of the
page the user is on will render this `<MetadataOutlet />` component. We
only need a single outlet per segment as only a single error needs to be
thrown & caught.
### How
This will only render a `MetadataOutlet` for the first parallel route
that is encountered at each segment depth, as we only need a single
handler to throw the error.
Fixes#65013
Closes NEXT-3222
When you do client navigation to a dynamic page with call like
`headers()`, it wil send RSC request for that page. We want to skip the
`_rsc` query in the logging as it's disruptive.
Closes NEXT-3077
Closes#64355
This extends #64520 to cover cases where client components originate
from node_modules (foreign code).
Test Plan: Extended the integration test to cover this
Closes#64412
Fixes PACK-3014
---------
Co-authored-by: OJ Kwon <1210596+kwonoj@users.noreply.github.com>
If a forwarded server action redirects, don't attempt to follow the
redirect as it can lead to errors. For example, if the forwarded request
followed a redirect to the same URL and had to forward the request
again, it'd hit a loop. The redirect will be handled by the
`X-Action-Redirect` which will be set when the forwarded action hits the
`createRedirectRenderResult` case.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-3243
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
When pages are rendered using partial prerendering (PPR), they can
easily trigger cases that attempt to interrupt static rendering. If a
user calls `fetch` from within a `unstable_cache` callback with `cache:
"no-store"`, we currently break out, as that fetch operation is called
within a cached callback.
### Why?
Without this change, using `unstable_cache` would have limited affect
when dealing with external code that explicitly sets `cache: "no-store"`
preventing it from utilizing the user-specified-cache.
### How?
This modifies the fetch patching so it doesn't bail static rendering due
to dynamic fetches within an `unstable_cache` callback.
Closes NEXT-3220
A common pattern for parallel routes is breadcrumbs. For example, if I
have a lot of dynamic pages, and I want to render a parallel route that
renders as a breadcrumb to enumerate those dynamic params, intuitively
I'd reach for something like `app/@slot/[...allTheThings]/page.tsx`.
Currently however, `[...allTheThings]` would only match params to a
corresponding `app/[allTheThings]/page.tsx`. This makes it difficult to
build the breadcrumbs use-case unless you re-create every single dynamic
page in the parallel route as well.
This adds handling to provide unmatched catch-all routes with all of the
params that are known. For example, if I was on
`/app/[artist]/[album]/[track]`, and I visited `/zack/greatest-hits/1`,
the parallel `@slot` params would receive: `{ allTheThings: ['zack',
'greatest-hits', '1'] }`
Fixes#62539
Closes NEXT-3230
### What
Cookies set/updated/removed in middleware won't be accessible during the
render in which they were set
### Why
Middleware will properly set a `set-cookie` header to inform the client
of the cookie change, but this means the `AsyncLocalStorage` context
containing the cookies value wouldn't be updated until the next time the
request headers were parsed. In other words, on the first request the
cookie would be sent but wouldn't be available in the `cookies()`
context. And then the following request would properly have the cookie
values.
### How
This uses a proxy on the `ResponseCookies` used in middleware to add a
middleware override header with the cookie value. When we instantiate
the cached cookies, we merge in whatever headers would have been set by
middleware, so that they're available in the same render that invoked
middleware.
### Test Plan
This changeset adds a test to confirm cookies set/deleted in middleware
are available in a single pass. Verified with a deployment
[here](https://vtest314-e2e-tests-ldx7olfl1-ztanner.vercel.app/rsc-cookies).
Fixes#49442
Closes NEXT-1126
### What
The "auto" prefetching behavior differs between dev/prod, resulting in
confusing DX when configuring `experimental.staleTimes = { static: 0,
dynamic: 0 }`.
### Why
Prefetching is intentionally disabled in dev, but we still will create
an "auto" prefetch on navigation. When configuring
`experimental.staleTimes` to have a `0` value in both static/dynamic
cases (a pattern that isn't a good idea, but should still have
consistent DX), it means that any auto prefetching that happens is
effectively discarded immediately, as we also would also not be able to
re-use the loading data.
In prod, we would have created a "temporary" prefetch for this case,
which is effectively not a prefetch at all and gets the full RSC data.
However in dev, we've special-cased these prefetches to be "auto", so
the client won't ever receive fresh data after the first time the cache
is seeded.
### How
This removes the special-handling for dev to instead be similar to other
prefetches that are created ad-hoc, and marks it as a "temporary"
prefetch kind. This has the added benefit of not triggering 2 separate
RSC calls in dev when only one is really needed.
### Test Plan
Client cache tests were previously disabled in dev because caching
behavior does intentionally differ between dev/prod. But we can at the
very least assert that the "auto" prefetching behavior is consistent
between the two environments, so that's what has been added to the tests
here.
This also adds a test for the `experimental.staleTimes = { static: 0,
dynamic: 0 }` case.
x-ref:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/54075#discussioncomment-9202650
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-3209
We currently have logic spread in multiple places that normalize `nxtP`
parameters into their regular names, ie `nxtPfoo` -> `foo`. However we
don't apply this same logic to `nxtI`, which conceptually is another
parameter but for route interception. As a result, the interception
route would 404 when deployed because it'd be missing the interception
parameter.
This moves the normalization check into a util and updates the spots I
could find where we handle `nxtP` to also handle `nxtI`.
### Test Plan
Added a new test, and validated via these deploys:
**Working**:
[Link](https://vtest314-e2e-tests-m889gxi4p-vtest314-ijjk-testing.vercel.app/)
**Non-Working**:
[Link](https://vtest314-e2e-tests-8sa5t9uau-vtest314-ijjk-testing.vercel.app/)
Fixes#62207
Closes NEXT-3204
### What
Apply the react aliases for app dir also to the files with
`pagesExtension`
### Why
In the page bundle of mdx page:
In RSC layer react is referencing to the insatlled react 18.2.0 's
`jsx-runtime` to create each JSX element. The react 18.2 JSX runtime
access `propTypes` of the component type and then it crashes 💥
In RSC layer it should use the built-in react canary's `jsx-runtime`.
The reason that it didn't use the built-in one is we're using customized
`pageExtension` `["mdx"]` for mdx, where we didn't apply all these rules
for the files with `pageExtension`, but only the js and ts files by
default.
For mdx specifically, we cannot only applied to
`(page|layout|route).[page extension]` cause every mdx file needs to
have proper resolution. Since this doesn't break transform, it's safe to
apply for all files with page extension.
Fixes#58888
Closes NEXT-3187
The function we use to generate a string with named parameters to pass
into `path-to-regexp` currently doesn't properly handle non-word
characters (namely, for the purposes of this bugfix, hyphens). As a
result, `pathToRegexp` will convert something like `/foo/:bar-baz` into
`/^\/foo(?:\/([^\/#\?]+?))-baz[\/#\?]?$/i`, effectively only treating
the `:foo` as part of the regex capture group and leaving a dangling
-baz.
This means using an interception route within a dynamic segment (such as
`/foo/[bar-baz]`) would not properly trigger the route interception
Fixes#64766
### What?
I submitted PR #64499 , it got merged, but it contains a mistake.
I'm terribly sorry about this!
By removing the traceparent from the cachekey, we mistakenly removed the
header from the original object.
Causing the actual request to be executed without the traceparent
header.
### Why?
Creating a cachekey should not alter the original object.
### How?
Flip the arguments for Object.assign
---------
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey <jeffrey@jeffreyzutt.nl>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
This ensures that the body limit option is enforced on all request
bodies sent to the Node.js runtime, not just the multipart field size
limits.
### Why?
The documentation states that this should limit the body size,
previously it only limited the field size.
### How?
This uses a `Transform` stream from Node.js. [Based on my
benchmarks](https://gist.github.com/wyattjoh/c470d98095da2f95f5920396aba2a206)
using the transform stream added next to no overhead, yet it did
simplify the implementation quite a bit. Assuming this is due to the
already performant stream support within Node.js.
Closes NEXT-3151
When a server action triggers a redirect, we're incorrectly applying a
refresh marker to the segment they were on, rather than the segment they
were being redirected to. As a result, when revalidation occurs (via
`revalidateX` or `router.refresh()`), the top-level segment would be
replaced with data for an incorrect segment.
For example, if triggering a redirect action from `/redirect` to `/`,
the router state tree would save a reference to `/redirect`. The next
time a refresh or revalidate happens, it'd refresh the segment data for
`/redirect` instead of `/`.
Fixes#64728
Closes NEXT-3156
When the router cache can't find a cache node for the requested segment,
it performs a request to the server to get the missing data. This
request to the server currently will always include the `next-url`
header, and on soft-navigations, the router will route the request to
the intercepted handler. This lazy fetch is treated as a soft navigation
by the server, and will incorrectly return data for the intercepted
route.
Similar to the handling in `router.refresh`, and the server action
reducer, we should not include the `next-url` header if there's no
interception route currently in the tree, as otherwise we'll be
erroneously triggering the intercepted route.
Fixes#64676
Closes NEXT-3146
Reverts vercel/next.js#64271
This appears to be causing problems rendering error boundaries on SPA
navigations and needs further investigation
Closes NEXT-3150
