This replaces the server-sent events HMR connection with a WebSocket connection to prevent hitting browser connection limits, allow sending events back from the browser, and overall better performance.
This approach sets up the the `upgrade` event listener on the server immediately when created via `next dev` and on the first request using `req.socket.server` when created via a custom server. In a follow-up PR we can push the files changed via the WebSocket as well.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/10061
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/8064
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/4495
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Fixes#28687
According to the answer in #28687, `GetStaticPropsResult` should allow specifying `revalidate` next to the `notFound: true`. Right now it's missing in the types def and allows to return any type. Also this may lead to confusion, that `revalidate` can't be used with the `notFound: true`
Example:
```ts
export const getStaticProps: GetStaticProps = async ({ locale }) => {
const data = await fetchData();
if (!data) {
return {
notFound: true,
revalidate: new Date() // ts doesn't know the revalidate field and allows this
};
}
return {
props: { data },
revalidate: new Date() // ts know the revalidate field, so it doesn't allow this
};
};
```
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Currently `new URL()` for server assets is completely broken because of the `publicPath` that is used for them too. `new URL()` for SSR is broken on windows as it's using absolute urls on the windows filesystem. And `new URL()` is using an incorrect filename
* Place all `asset`s correctly in `/_next/static/media` with `[name].[hash:8][ext]`
* Added a separate runtime chunk for api entries, without `publicPath`
* Introduce separate layer for api entries, which uses server-side URLs.
* Otherwise new URL() will return a faked relative URL, that is identical in SSR and CSR
* Disables react-refresh for api entries
Fixes#27413
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Use `Writable` instead of `Observable` and remove the `zen-observable` dependencies. I initially opted to use `Observable` for simplicity and fast iteration, but we should really just use `Writable` directly (or some other stream in the future).
React's streaming SSR has some [specific requirements](https://github.com/reactwg/react-18/discussions/66#discussioncomment-944266) on the stream API. Rather than trying to also squeeze a `Readable` in here, which might be more standard for node apps, I've just followed React's lead. By limiting ourselves to just `Writable`, it ought to be easier to adopt a different stream type in the future if desired.
The React `pipeToNodeWritable` API requires us to pass a stream immediately, but we don't actually have a `ServerResponse` to give it until `RenderResult.pipe(...)` is called later. For that reason, we pass React a `Writable` that we will simply forward to `res` later. This mechanism of deferring is `NodeWritablePiper`, which is just a function that can be called with `ServerResponse` (or another `Writable`, as we now do to render to string for static results) to have content written to it. `NodeWritablePiper` takes a `next` argument so that we can chain both synchronous and asynchronous pipers together.
Also does some clean up and adds another streaming test for backpressure.
In a previous PR, `getServerSideProps` was altered to support returning
`props` as a promise. This change updates the TS types to permit promises
as well, so you can write type `GetServerSideProps<Props>` instead of
`GetServerSideProps<Promise<Props>>`. e.g.:
```typescript
type Props = {
data: string
}
export const getServerSideProps: GetServerSideProps<Props> = async (
context
) => {
return {
props: (async function () {
return { data: 'some data' }
})(),
}
}
```
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
on GetServerSidePropsContext and GetStaticPropsContext
As discussed on #21574 having a generic type will give it more flexibility and remove linting errors.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using #21574
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This type was added in PR #28269 but doesn't need to be public and was causing conflicts with `@types/react@17`.
We currently use `@types/react@16` so ideally we should upgrade to `@types/react@17` and then remove the `ts-ignore`.
Fixes#28647
This PR does a few things:
- Moves `<noscript>` usage below the blur image since so that the `<noscript>` image renders on top of the blur image
- Remove the `isVisible` check for `<noscript>` since we can't rely on client-side JS
- Add `loading=lazy` to the `<noscript>` image to take advantage of native lazy loading (can't rely on JS lazy loading)
Fixes#28251
Our `Observable` use has gotten sufficiently complex that it makes sense to just use a 3rd party implementation and not worry about maintaining it ourselves. As a bonus, it doesn't rely on Node APIs.
* Update styed-jsx to latest version, containing bugfixes for babel plugin and typings.
* Use `/// <reference>` instead of redeclaring types
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This PR introduces an improved developer experience when `next lint` is run for the first time.
### Current behavior
`eslint-config-next` is a required package that must be installed before proceeding with `next lint` or `next build`:
Although this has helped many developers start using the new ESLint config, this has also resulted in a few issues:
- Users are required to install the full config (`eslint-config-next`) even if they do not use it or use the Next.js plugin directly (`eslint-plugin-next`).
- #26348
- There's some confusion on why `eslint-config-next` needs to be installed or how it should be used instead of `eslint-plugin-next`.
- #26574
- #26475
- #26438
### New behavior
Instead of enforcing `eslint-config-next` as a required package, this PR prompts the user by asking what config they would like to start. This happens when `next lint` is run for the first time **and** if no ESLint configuration is detected in the application.
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/124331177-e1668a80-db5c-11eb-8915-38d3dc20f5d4.gif" width="800" />
- The CLI will take care of installing `eslint` or `eslint-config-next` if either is not already installed
- Users now have the option to choose between a strict configuration (`next/core-web-vitals`) or just the base configuration (`next`)
- For users that decide to create their own ESLint configuration, or already have an existing one, **installing `eslint-config-next` will not be a requirement for `next lint` or `next build` to run**. A warning message will just show if the Next.js ESLint plugin is not detected in an ESLint config.
<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-25 at 3 02 12 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/123473329-6cc4a680-d5c6-11eb-9a57-d5c0b89a2732.png">
---
In addition, this PR also:
- Fixes#26348
- Updates documentation to make it more clear what approach to take for new and existing ESLint configurations
This PR does a couple things:
1. Omit svg static imports if the user has defined custom webpack config with svg rule
2. Change TS type to `any` for svg imports to avoid conflicts with other plugins
The idea is that some users want to use `next/image` with static imports for most image types but not for svg and instead inline those images with a plugin.
- Fixes#25950
- Fixes#26130
- Fixes#26176
- Fixes#26196
- Fixes#26067
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using Fixes#26130
- [x] Integration tests added
If you give a Static Image to the Image component, TypeScript will throw a type error. This Pull Request fixes it.
## Bug
- ~~Related issues linked using `fixes #number`~~
- [x] Integration tests added
## ~~Feature~~
- ~~Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.~~
- ~~Related issues linked using `fixes #number`~~
- ~~Integration tests added~~
- ~~Documentation added~~
- ~~Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.~~
## ~~Documentation / Examples~~
- ~~Make sure the linting passes~~
---
follow-up #24993
cc @atcastle
## Bug
- [x] fixes#24684
- [x] Integration tests added
Intentionally omitted changing the types for `GetServerSideProps` etc. as its imo less reasonable to leverage SSR with a sync `getServerSideProps`. Can of course change the type too if you consider that also a valid case.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
@timneutkens it'd be great to get your input.
These changes introduce a new Babel loader that eliminates much of the existing overhead, resulting in better HMR speeds.
Multithreading is still in flight, and may be omitted if speed improvements end up being negligible. For now, the new loader is hidden behind an `experimental` flag.
Items to be completed before this PR is ready to merge:
- [x] reconfigure `ncc` to precompile the parts of `@babel/core` and `@babel/traverse` that we're accessing directly
- [x] change `@babel/core/...` imports to `ncc`ed version
- [x] ~~measure multithreading (not currently pushed) functionality, and include the functionality depending on the results~~ I'll open a separate PR for this
- [x] ensure TypeScript is happy with all imports as final step (`--no-verify` was used to bypass)
There will be two follow-up PRs:
- loader support for projects with custom `.babelrc`
- multithreaded loader (should the change we warranted after measurement)
This should resolve the typing issues described in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/21390 from the webpack inlining, by declaring `next/dist/compiled/webpack` in the main typing file as a source.
The original type for `GetServerSidePropsContext.req.cookies` was introduced in #19724. In the PR, the test at `test/integration/typescript/test/index.test.js` expects req.cookies to always exist, so `req.cookies` will never be undefined.
I'm guessing that req.cookies is parsed using the same cookie middleware as `NextApiRequest`, in which case `req.cookies` should be `{ [key: string]: string }`, not `{ [key: string]: any }`.
As discussed with @csswizardry. This is a temporary option in case you know the preloads are not needed. It will likely be a default once the ScriptLoader work from @janicklas-ralph has been proven in partner apps and landed.
```js
// pages/index.js
export const config = {
unstable_JsPreload: false
}
```
This picks up on the inlining work in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/20598 to also include webpack loader inlining optimizations.
This includes:
* The dependencies of sass-loader
* resolve-url-loader
And for added benefit:
* babel-plugin-transform-define
* babel-plugin-transform-react-remove-prop-types
style-loader and css-loader didn't inline easily. Perhaps we can come back to these ones.
We accidentally regressed back in 9.5 and dropped support for inline CSS comments. PostCSS always parses these as pass-through (and not a syntax error), which can cause problems when minifying.
Browsers do a similar thing and ignore the comments.
To ensure we generate valid CSS, this adds support for stripping the CSS comments from the build.
---
Fixes#15589Closes#17130
This upgrades to ncc@0.25.0 and fixes the previous bugs including:
* ncc not referenced correctly in build
* Babel type errors
* node-fetch, etag, chalk and raw-body dependencies not building with ncc - these have been "un-ncc'd" for now. As they are relatively small dependencies, this doesn't seem too much of an issue and we can follow up in the tracking ncc issue at https://github.com/vercel/ncc/issues/612.
* `yarn dev` issues
Took a lot of bisecting, but the overall diff isn't too bad here in the end.
This adds inlining for Babel and the Babel plugins used in next.
This is based to the PR at https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/18823.
The approach is to make one large bundle and then separate out the individual packages from that in order to avoid duplications.
In the first attempt the Babel bundle size was 10MB... using "resolutions" in the Yarn workspace to reduce the duplicated packages this was brought down to a 2.8MB bundle for Babel and all the used plugins which is exactly the expected file size here.
This will thus add a 2.8MB download size to the next package, but save downloading any babel dependencies separately, removing a large number of package dependencies from the overall install.
This adds ncc inlining optimizations for the following dependencies:
* cacache
* schema-utils
* find-cache-dir
* mkdirp
* neo-async
* web-vitals
The slight increase in output in the reports here is due to the variation of the bundled version of web-vitals.
In addition, this moves ast-types to be a devDependencies entry instead of in dependencies as it was before https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/14746 as I could not see any production usage (ping @prateekbh). Happy to separate that out into a separate PR if preferred too.
