We accidentally regressed back in 9.5 and dropped support for inline CSS comments. PostCSS always parses these as pass-through (and not a syntax error), which can cause problems when minifying.
Browsers do a similar thing and ignore the comments.
To ensure we generate valid CSS, this adds support for stripping the CSS comments from the build.
---
Fixes#15589Closes#17130
`node-sass` v5 introduced support for Node.js v15, which is not supported by v4. However, Next.js currently errors with
```
Error: Node Sass version 5.0.0 is incompatible with ^4.0.0.
```
when attempting to build with `node-sass` 5.0.0. This error comes from `sass-loader`. They have recently released version 10.0.5 which supports `node-sass` 5.0.0 (PR <https://github.com/webpack-contrib/sass-loader/pull/899>, release <https://github.com/webpack-contrib/sass-loader/releases/tag/v10.0.5>).
This makes sure we don't use es6 syntax when compiling the `web-vitals` package with `ncc` since that breaks IE11 compatibility
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/ncc/pull/614
This upgrades to ncc@0.25.0 and fixes the previous bugs including:
* ncc not referenced correctly in build
* Babel type errors
* node-fetch, etag, chalk and raw-body dependencies not building with ncc - these have been "un-ncc'd" for now. As they are relatively small dependencies, this doesn't seem too much of an issue and we can follow up in the tracking ncc issue at https://github.com/vercel/ncc/issues/612.
* `yarn dev` issues
Took a lot of bisecting, but the overall diff isn't too bad here in the end.
This adds inlining for Babel and the Babel plugins used in next.
This is based to the PR at https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/18823.
The approach is to make one large bundle and then separate out the individual packages from that in order to avoid duplications.
In the first attempt the Babel bundle size was 10MB... using "resolutions" in the Yarn workspace to reduce the duplicated packages this was brought down to a 2.8MB bundle for Babel and all the used plugins which is exactly the expected file size here.
This will thus add a 2.8MB download size to the next package, but save downloading any babel dependencies separately, removing a large number of package dependencies from the overall install.
This updates to the latest ncc@0.24.1 release.
Initially I thought chalk needed to be removed to make this work, but it turns out it was a caching issue.
I've also added a cache clear to the rebuild command to avoid these issues hopefully in future.
This adds ncc inlining optimizations for the following dependencies:
* cacache
* schema-utils
* find-cache-dir
* mkdirp
* neo-async
* web-vitals
The slight increase in output in the reports here is due to the variation of the bundled version of web-vitals.
In addition, this moves ast-types to be a devDependencies entry instead of in dependencies as it was before https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/14746 as I could not see any production usage (ping @prateekbh). Happy to separate that out into a separate PR if preferred too.
This makes sure the image optimizer doesn't de-animate images by transforming them with sharp since sharp doesn't currently handle outputting animated images
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/17749
- Use latest terser version (still 1 warning in the stable version which is an open PR)
- Add emitOnErrors instead of noEmitOnErrors
- Added trace-deprecations for Next.js core development
Looks like `caniuse-lite` is out of date and causing test failures.
- I upgraded both `browserslist` and `caniuse-lite` to latest semver compatible version.
- This seemed to cause changes in ncc compiled files, so recompiled.
- `lint-staged` failed on these files even though they should be ignored. As a fix, I applied the advice from https://github.com/okonet/lint-staged#how-can-i-ignore-files-from-eslintignore-
- Updated some test snapshots. 🤔 not sure this is the way to go
This pull request updates our TypeScript verification process to not wipe out potentially vital user comments.
Introducing a prompt process was mostly a side effect of users wanting to keep comments.
There's no reason we really need this prompt, as answering no would refuse to boot the Next.js server anyway.
---
Fixes#8128Closes#11440
