Given the context of the surrounding sentence, I believe the intention here was to use the word `increasing`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
## Feature
- [x] Documentation added
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
It seems that people currently struggle to style their image: https://twitter.com/achrlswrth/status/1425695122029744128, this clarifies that you can use className to do this (something I just learnt!). At the moment, this is kind of hidden in "other props" I think this makes it more clear for people
Thanks,
Sam
This PR adds a recommendation to test production code with Cypress and re-orders the page information.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Add a new doc showing how to configure Jest and Cypress with Next.js
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X] Documentation updated
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Google has begun using Cumulative Layout Shift as a factor in ranking search results, according to the linked Google docs.
This perhaps will make this page out of sync with other Nextjs docs, but I figure better start somewhere.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Documentation:
- Expands the "Migrating Existing Config" section of ESLint doc to explain in more detail
- Minor changes to the "Ignoring ESLint" doc
Bug fixes:
- Adds `browser` and `node` environments to `eslint-config-next`. Closes#26319
- Fixes `no-document-import` rule. Closes#26159
- Fixes `no-page-custom-font` rule. Closes#26160#26894
This PR introduces an improved developer experience when `next lint` is run for the first time.
### Current behavior
`eslint-config-next` is a required package that must be installed before proceeding with `next lint` or `next build`:
Although this has helped many developers start using the new ESLint config, this has also resulted in a few issues:
- Users are required to install the full config (`eslint-config-next`) even if they do not use it or use the Next.js plugin directly (`eslint-plugin-next`).
- #26348
- There's some confusion on why `eslint-config-next` needs to be installed or how it should be used instead of `eslint-plugin-next`.
- #26574
- #26475
- #26438
### New behavior
Instead of enforcing `eslint-config-next` as a required package, this PR prompts the user by asking what config they would like to start. This happens when `next lint` is run for the first time **and** if no ESLint configuration is detected in the application.
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/124331177-e1668a80-db5c-11eb-8915-38d3dc20f5d4.gif" width="800" />
- The CLI will take care of installing `eslint` or `eslint-config-next` if either is not already installed
- Users now have the option to choose between a strict configuration (`next/core-web-vitals`) or just the base configuration (`next`)
- For users that decide to create their own ESLint configuration, or already have an existing one, **installing `eslint-config-next` will not be a requirement for `next lint` or `next build` to run**. A warning message will just show if the Next.js ESLint plugin is not detected in an ESLint config.
<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-25 at 3 02 12 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/123473329-6cc4a680-d5c6-11eb-9a57-d5c0b89a2732.png">
---
In addition, this PR also:
- Fixes#26348
- Updates documentation to make it more clear what approach to take for new and existing ESLint configurations
For users looking at the api reference for 'next/head' it might be a good idea to let them know that there is the 'next/script' component. Using 'next/script' has a lot of advantages over adding a script tag with 'next/head'
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
## Explanation
Fixes#27465
I added some docs on how to use per page persistent layouts in TypeScript as this requires you to extend some types and it might not be trivial if you are just starting out with TypeScript.
I copied the js example so it might be better to remove some of the duplication where possible, let me know.
All feedback is welcome
This documents the request query passing behavior of redirects to help avoid confusion.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/27194
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Attempt to fix#26393
~~Sorry, I wasn't able to run tests on local, but I hope at least test should be valid.~~
Edit: Tests are working correctly on my local :)
fixes#26393
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #26393`
- [x] Integration tests added
* add no-typos rule to eslint
* return early when function name is correct
* Handle null decl.type
* update check
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR adds `lazyBoundary` prop on Image Component.
This feature is to load the images earlier.
I'm not good at English. So, I couldn't explain enough in the documentation what `lazyBoundary` is.
Feature request: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/24552
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
* Use sharp for image transformations when available
* Refactor resizeImage and add sharp warning
* only show sharp warning once per instance
* Modify sharp error message
* Add documentation for optional sharp dependency
* Update docs/basic-features/image-optimization.md
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Import types for sharp
* Update lockfile
* Add testing against sharp
* use fs-extra for node 12
* Rename test sharp path variable
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* update squoosh specific test
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* update tests
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
The prior configuration name indicating that it launched the application. Really, it just attaches to an already running application, which the new name indicates.
With the default Next.js template project, the .main and .container divs have `display: flex` style rule. However, as commented in [this issue](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/18489#issuecomment-857146988), if may not display properly an <Image /> placed as direct child.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
* Add extra explanation to next/image about positioning
In my experience, when using next/image, a lot of devs forget about the `position: relative` when using `layout: fill`. I think it's a small and effective change to implement this one line to make it more clear.
* Update docs/api-reference/next/image.md
* lint-fix
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
In a previous PR (#27200), we added `minimumCacheTTL` to configure the time-to-live for the cached image. However, this was setting the `max-age` header.
This PR ensures that `minimumCacheTTL` doesn't affect browser caching, only the upstream header can affect browser caching.
This is a bit safer in case the developer accidentally caches something that shouldn't be and the cache needs to be invalidated. Simply delete the `.next/cache/images` directory.
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Fixes#27252 by using a named function rather than an arrow function. If this is the correct fix, then modifications are also needed for the `layout-component` example, but I'm just providing this one modification right now in case this fix is incorrect.
Fixes inline scripts being duplicated when used with `next/script` component
## Bug
- [x] fixes#26860
- [x] Integration tests added
## Documentation / Examples
Updated docs to indicate that `id` is needed for inline scripts
This expands on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/27211 and lists the full routes order used in Next.js to allow more exact matching when leveraging the different rewrite priorities.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This adds a note explaining that `beforeFiles` continue instead of checking the filesystem/dynamic routes immediately like they do in `afterFiles` and `fallback`.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/26795
- Closes#23328
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
The right terminology should be used so we don't learn new developers wrong facts.
Using pure function here is plain wrong, the definition of a pure functions is as follows:
> The function return values are identical for identical arguments. The function application has no side effects.
What you have here both have side effects, the calls to `res.setXXX`, and it isn't identical for identical arguments since you have `Date.now()`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
- Helps clear up customer confusion about how to share React state with layouts, including nested layouts
- Provides guidance on best practices before shipping your application to production
Open to any feedback!
Fixes#27094
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
