This PR re-includes ESLint with some notable changes, namely a guided setup similar to how TypeScript is instantiated in a Next.js application.
To add ESLint to a project, developers will have to create an `.eslintrc` file in the root of their project or add an empty `eslintConfig` object to their `package.json` file.
```js
touch .eslintrc
```
Then running `next build` will show instructions to install the required packages needed:
<img width="862" alt="Screen Shot 2021-04-19 at 7 38 27 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/115316182-dfd51b00-a146-11eb-830c-90bad20ed151.png">
Once installed and `next build` is run again, `.eslintrc` will be automatically configured to include the default config:
```json
{
"extends": "next"
}
```
In addition to this change:
- The feature is now under the experimental flag and requires opt-in. After testing and feedback, it will be switched to the top-level namespace and turned on by default.
- A new ESLint shareable configuration package is included that can be extended in any application with `{ extends: 'next' }`
- This default config extends recommended rule sets from [`eslint-plugin-react`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react), [`eslint-plugin-react-hooks`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react-hooks), and [`eslint-plugin-next`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@next/eslint-plugin-next)
- All rules in [`eslint-plugin-next`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@next/eslint-plugin-next) have been modified to include actionable links that show more information to help resolve each issue
Fixes#24421
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
Can't add an integration test currently, we'll add Node 16 tests later.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/23588 to update to use a regex lexer to gather the named regex groups instead of attempting to gather them through executing the regex since it can fail to gather the regex groups when they are using specific matching. This also ensures we don't pass the value as a segment when value is defined and it doesn't use a capture group. Additional tests are added to cover these cases and documentation updated to reflect this.
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/23415
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
@timneutkens it'd be great to get your input.
These changes introduce a new Babel loader that eliminates much of the existing overhead, resulting in better HMR speeds.
Multithreading is still in flight, and may be omitted if speed improvements end up being negligible. For now, the new loader is hidden behind an `experimental` flag.
Items to be completed before this PR is ready to merge:
- [x] reconfigure `ncc` to precompile the parts of `@babel/core` and `@babel/traverse` that we're accessing directly
- [x] change `@babel/core/...` imports to `ncc`ed version
- [x] ~~measure multithreading (not currently pushed) functionality, and include the functionality depending on the results~~ I'll open a separate PR for this
- [x] ensure TypeScript is happy with all imports as final step (`--no-verify` was used to bypass)
There will be two follow-up PRs:
- loader support for projects with custom `.babelrc`
- multithreaded loader (should the change we warranted after measurement)
This pull request **temporarily** removes ESLint, as it was not landed in accordance with our standard experimental policies. We are fully committed to landing this change again.
This is being reverted because:
- Next.js has very strict goals for its install size. This feature resulted in adding over 17MB, or a 43.6% increase.
- The feature was not first landed under the `experimental` key in `next.config.js`, rather, it was added under the stable namespace (top-level)
- Using the feature doesn't do a "guided setup" like TypeScript, it should ask you to "bring your own" dependencies for ESLint
- It uses a undesirable ESLint plugin name: `plugin:@next/next/recommended`. This should read out as strictly `next`, or as short as we can get it.
- Does not provide actionable warnings (missing link to resolve issue)
- Does not follow appropriate console output styling. We need to revisit how these are presented.
To re-land this, we need to ensure the following minimums are met:
- Very minor change in install size
- Fully experimental (i.e. flagged) with warnings
- Finalized package name and configuration shape, preferably so we can do ` { extends: 'next' } `.
