This corrects some unhandledRejection errors showing when a connection is canceled with the edge runtime since the changes needed for 14463ddd10. This also adds a regression test to ensure we don't have these class of errors in our middleware tests.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03Q1UU3Z4H/p1658960102013969)
(For context, the logic and tests have been moved to `app-render`.)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
- Add additional comments for reducer functions.
- Add comments for CacheNode
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
A small refactor PR to convert some imports to type imports, as well as removing a couple of unused exports.
The Edge SSR loader is also missing the global process injection (`enhanceGlobals`).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Expanded app-render.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This line was introduced in #38862 to the base server but should only be useful for the Node.js server:
```js
addRequestMeta(req, '__NEXT_CLONABLE_BODY', getClonableBody(req.body))
```
It also introduces polyfill of `stream` to the edge server.
Here we add an abstract method to handle it differently, where only `__NEXT_INIT_QUERY` is used.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR updates the Edge Runtime to use a new version that loads dependencies differently. This addresses https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38766 so `instanceof` works as expected.
It involved a few code changes, mostly regarding to types. The most important change is that the `Runner` function in the sandbox doesn't take a `ReadableStream` as `body` anymore since this implies creating the instance on "node land" and makes the runtime `fetch` function not to be able to compare with `ReadableStream` using `instanceof`. Instead we introduce a "clonable body" abstraction that allows to create the `ReadableStream` from `Readable` by using the edge runtime primitive which would hold the correct prototype.
Also, this PR changes the way we pre-compile the Edge Runtime to adapt it to the new version.
`experimental.optimizeCss` from `next.config.js` can be an object containing the critters' option:
70a53e0789/packages/next/server/post-process.ts (L224-L232)
The PR corrects the ajv schema and the type definition of `experimental.optimizeCss`.
## What’s in there?
This PR brings more consistency in how errors and warnings are reported when running code in the Edge Runtime:
- Dynamic code evaluation (`eval()`, `new Function()`, `WebAssembly.instantiate()`, `WebAssembly.compile()`…)
- Usage of Node.js global APIs (`BroadcastChannel`, `Buffer`, `TextDecoderStream`, `setImmediate()`...)
- Usage of Node.js modules (`fs`, `path`, `child_process`…)
The new error messages should mention *Edge Runtime* instead of *Middleware*, so they are valid in both cases.
It also fixes a bug where the process polyfill would issue a warning for `process.cwd` (which is `undefined` but legit). Now, one has to invoke the function `process.cwd()` to trigger the error.
It finally fixes the react-dev-overlay, where links from middleware and Edge API route files could not be opened because of the `(middleware)/` prefix in their name.
About the later, please note that we can’t easily remove the prefix or change it for Edge API routes. It comes from the Webpack layer, which is the same for both. We may consider renaming it to *edge* instead in the future.
## How to test?
These changes are almost fully covered with tests:
```bash
pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern runtime-dynamic
pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern runtime-with-node
pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern runtime-module
pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern middleware-dev-errors
```
To try them out manually, you can write a middleware and Edge route files like these:
```jsx
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import { basename } from 'path'
export default async function middleware() {
eval('2+2')
setImmediate(() => {})
basename()
return NextResponse.next()
}
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```jsx
// pages/api/route.js
import { basename } from 'path'
export default async function handle() {
eval('2+2')
setImmediate(() => {})
basename()
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
The expected behaviours are:
- [x] dev, middleware/edge route is using a node.js module: error at runtime (logs + read-dev-overlay):
```bash
error - (middleware)/pages/api/route.js (1:0) @ Object.handle [as handler]
error - The edge runtime does not support Node.js 'path' module.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
> 1 | import { basename } from "path";
2 | export default async function handle() {
```
- [x] build, middleware/edge route is using a node.js module: warning but succeeds
```bash
warn - Compiled with warnings
./middleware.js
A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 4) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
./pages/api/route.js
A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 1) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
```
- [x] production, middleware/edge route is using a node.js module: error at runtime (logs + 500 error)
```bash
Error: The edge runtime does not support Node.js 'path' module.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
at <unknown> (file:///Users/damien/dev/next.js/packages/next/server/web/sandbox/context.ts:149)
```
- [x] dev, middleware/edge route is using a node.js global API: error at runtime (logs + read-dev-overlay):
```bash
error - (middleware)/pages/api/route.js (4:2) @ Object.handle [as handler]
error - A Node.js API is used (setImmediate) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn more: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/edge-runtime
2 |
3 | export default async function handle() {
> 4 | setImmediate(() => {})
| ^
```
- [x] build, middleware/edge route is using a node.js global API: warning but succeeds
```bash
warn - Compiled with warnings
./middleware.js
A Node.js API is used (setImmediate at line: 6) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn more: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/edge-runtime
./pages/api/route.js
A Node.js API is used (setImmediate at line: 3) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn more: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/edge-runtime
```
- [x] production, middleware/edge route is using a node.js module: error at runtime (logs + 500 error)
```bash
Error: A Node.js API is used (setImmediate) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn more: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/edge-runtime
at <unknown> (file:///Users/damien/dev/next.js/packages/next/server/web/sandbox/context.ts:330)
```
- [x] dev, middleware/edge route is loading dynamic code: warning at runtime (logs + read-dev-overlay) and request succeeds (we allow dynamic code in dev only):
```bash
warn - (middleware)/middleware.js (7:2) @ Object.middleware [as handler]
warn - Dynamic Code Evaluation (e. g. 'eval', 'new Function') not allowed in Edge Runtime
5 |
6 | export default async function middleware() {
> 7 | eval('2+2')
```
- [x] build, middleware/edge route is loading dynamic code: build fails with error:
```bash
Failed to compile.
./middleware.js
Dynamic Code Evaluation (e. g. 'eval', 'new Function', 'WebAssembly.compile') not allowed in Edge Runtime
Used by default
./pages/api/route.js
Dynamic Code Evaluation (e. g. 'eval', 'new Function', 'WebAssembly.compile') not allowed in Edge Runtime
Used by default
```
## Notes to reviewers
Edge-related errors are either issued from `next/server/web/sandbox/context.ts` file (runtime errors) or from `next/build/webpack/plugins/middleware-plugin.ts` (webpack compilation).
The previous implementation (I’m pleading guilty here) was way too verbose: some errors (Node.js global APIs like using `process.cwd()`) could be reported several times, and the previous mechanism to dedupe them (in middleware-plugin) wasn’t really effective.
Changes in tests are due to renaming existing tests such as `test/integration/middleware-with-node.js-apis` into `test/integration/edge-runtime-with-node.js-apis`. I extended them to cover Edge API route.
@hanneslund I’ve pushed the improvement you did in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38289/ one step further to avoid duplication.
Fixes a bug where `import { nanoid } from 'nanoid'` broke the tests.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Starting in Node.js 18, the `fetch` global was made available and that caused the squoosh implementation to assume it was on a web browser and try to fetch the wasm file instead of reading it from the filesystem. This PR deletes the code trying to fetch since we know that squoosh only runs in the Image Optimization API, not the browser.
- Fixes#38020
- Enables a test that was disabled in #38460
## How to reproduce
1. create a next.js app with a middleware (or an edge route) that imports a node.js module:
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import { basename } from 'path'
export default async function middleware() {
basename()
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
2. deploy it to vercel with `vc`
3. go to the your function logs in Vercel Front (https://vercel.com/$user/$project/$deployment/functions)
4. in another tab, query your application
> it results in a 500 page:
<img width="517" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/186268/179557102-72568ca9-bcfd-49e2-9b9c-c51c3064f2d7.png">
> in the logs you should see:
<img width="1220" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/186268/179557266-498f3290-b7df-46ac-8816-7bb396821245.png">
## Expected behavior
The route should fail indeed in a 500, because Edge runtime **does not support node.js modules**. However the error in logs should be completely different:
```shell
error - Error: The edge runtime does not support Node.js 'path' module.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
```
## Notes to reviewers
I introduced this issue in #38234.
Prior to the PR above, the app would not even build, as we were checking imported node.js module during the build with AST analysis.
Since #38234, the app would build and should fail at runtime, with an appropriate error.
The mistake was to declare `__import_unsupported` function in the sandbox's context, that is only used in `next dev` and `next start`, but not shipped to Vercel platform.
By loading it inside webpack loaders (both middleware and edge route), we ensure it will be defined on Vercel as well.
The existing test suite (`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-module-error`) covers them.
* [edge] allow importing blob assets
* Fix test
* extract to a new file, to make it easier to read and review
* Use webpack asset discovery and transform with a loader
* fix tests
* don't prefix assets
* use emitFile
* rename assets to blobs to be more specific
* rename blobs to assets and use webpack's hashing algo
* Dedupe correctly
* Add a Node.js dep test
* Update packages/next/server/next-server.ts
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
* [code review] test remote URL fetches
* [code review] use `import type` for type-only imports
* Update packages/next/server/next-server.ts
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Ensures the `<html>` is not wrapped in an extra div when the root layout is nested in a route group.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Temporarily we need to ensure that `<link>` tags are injected to `<head>` in the stream.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Add next.config.js validation with ajv
* update manifest
* update lib type
* remove old tests
* update to pre-build validation code
* ensure validate output is ncced
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Add example of typing next.config.js
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Went through the todos I had added while implementing the new router and removes everything that is now covered.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Ensures you can use server context when navigating.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Ensures you get a clearer error when createServerContext is missing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Both `Buffer` and `node-html-parser` are not necessary to be introduced to the Edge SSR bundle. This makes the bundle size 25% smaller.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* inject the link tags before page content in layout router
* fix flight handling during client navigation
* fix buffering
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Renames todos to split them / make it easier to find what has to be done for the new router.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Improve CSS modules support in server components.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Hi guys! First all, thanks for provide a way to use some custom external cache resource for ISR feature. _(done here: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37258 and https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37326)_
I managed to get it working by creating my custom external cache resource _(using redis)_ that implements the new `CacheHandler`. _(overriding my own `get` and `set` methods and using the FileSystemCache as fallback as well)_
I'm planning to release some kind of plugin to encapsulate and parse the client's `next.config.js` and bring an initial support for redis using this new Next.js feature.
So, I really don't know if this was intentional, but I noticed that the new `incrementalCacheHandlerPath` prop wasn't passed to the `IncrementalCache` instance in `base-server`.
This PR just connects the wires for this feature, and also provide the default value (`undefined`) to the relative experimental prop config. _(to avoid the warnings as shown below)_
<img width="858" alt="Screen Shot 2022-07-07 at 19 37 46" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4661217/177882897-831ade73-26ba-493a-b0cf-3de62cfd708f.png">
* Enable css in server components
* inject server css into flight
* refactor and fix test
* fix lint
* resolve css from module deps
* fix dev & prod inconsistentce, collect client css
* simplify
* dedupe duplicated css chunks
* remove ssr link injection and css flight
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Ensures catchall parameters are passed as an array to `params` instead of as a string.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Follow-up of #38439.
Found a small issue with booting `next start` that is now resolved.
Also added optional catchall routes support.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Adds support for `[...slug]` dynamic segments.
I found there's an inconsistency in query/params providing and added a quick fix for it now. Will update the handling in a follow-up PR to ensure it's consistently providing dynamic params outside of `query`.
Follow-up of #37551 and #38415.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This outputs a separate manifest for leveraging during deploy to handle the new app outputs. Also ensures dynamic routes from `app` our output in the `routes-manifest` correctly along with fixing the `react-dom` import.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37551
- Remove cache value that was incorrectly nested deeper
- Remove extra useEffect (already applied during hydration based on the `useReducer` input)
- Add dynamic parameter name into the tree
Follow-up to #37551, cleans up some code and prepares for catch-all and optional catch-all routes.
## Client-side router for `app` directory
This PR implements the new router that leverages React 18 concurrent features like Suspense and startTransition.
It also integrates with React Server Components and builds on top of it to allow server-centric routing that only renders the part of the page that has to change.
It's one of the pieces of the implementation of https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc.
## Details
I'm going to document the differences with the current router here (will be reworked for the upgrade guide)
### Client-side cache
In the current router we have an in-memory cache for getStaticProps data so that if you prefetch and then navigate to a route that has been prefetched it'll be near-instant. For getServerSideProps the behavior is different, any navigation to a page with getServerSideProps fetches the data again.
In the new model the cache is a fundamental piece, it's more granular than at the page level and is set up to ensure consistency across concurrent renders. It can also be invalidated at any level.
#### Push/Replace (also applies to next/link)
The new router still has a `router.push` / `router.replace` method.
There are a few differences in how it works though:
- It only takes `href` as an argument, historically you had to provide `href` (the page path) and `as` (the actual url path) to do dynamic routing. In later versions of Next.js this is no longer required and in the majority of cases `as` was no longer needed. In the new router there's no way to reason about `href` vs `as` because there is no notion of "pages" in the browser.
- Both methods now use `startTransition`, you can wrap these in your own `startTransition` to get `isPending`
- The push/replace support concurrent rendering. When a render is bailed by clicking a different link to navigate to a completely different page that still works and doesn't cause race conditions.
- Support for optimistic loading states when navigating
##### Hard/Soft push/replace
Because of the client-side cache being reworked this now allows us to cover two cases: hard push and soft push.
The main difference between the two is if the cache is reused while navigating. The default for `next/link` is a `hard` push which means that the part of the cache affected by the navigation will be invalidated, e.g. if you already navigated to `/dashboard` and you `router.push('/dashboard')` again it'll get the latest version. This is similar to the existing `getServerSideProps` handling.
In case of a soft push (API to be defined but for testing added `router.softPush('/')`) it'll reuse the existing cache and not invalidate parts that are already filled in. In practice this means it's more like the `getStaticProps` client-side navigation because it does not fetch on navigation except if a part of the page is missing.
#### Back/Forward navigation
Back and Forward navigation ([popstate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/popstate_event)) are always handled as a soft navigation, meaning that the cache is reused, this ensures back/forward navigation is near-instant when it's in the client-side cache. This will also allow back/forward navigation to be a high priority update instead of a transition as it is based on user interaction. Note: in this PR it still uses `startTransition` as there's no way to handle the high priority update suspending which happens in case of missing data in the cache. We're working with the React team on a solution for this particular case.
### Layouts
Note: this section assumes you've read [The layouts RFC](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) and [React Server Components RFC](https://reactjs.org/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react-server-components.html)
React Server Components rendering leverages the Flight streaming mechanism in React 18, this allows sending a serializable representation of the rendered React tree on the server to the browser, the client-side React can use this serialized representation to render components client-side without the JavaScript being sent to the browser. This is one of the building blocks of Server Components. This allows a bunch of interesting features but for now I'll keep it to how it affects layouts.
When you have a `app/dashboard/layout.js` and `app/dashboard/page.js` the page will render as children of the layout, when you add another page like `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` that page falls under the dashboard layout as well. When client-side navigating the new router automatically figures out if the page you're navigating to can be a smaller render than the whole page, in this case `app/dashboard/page.js` and `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` share the `app/dashboard/layout.js` so instead of rendering the whole page we render below the layout component, this means the layout itself does not get re-rendered, the layout's `getServerSideProps` would not be called, and the Flight response would only hold the result of `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js`, effectively giving you the smallest patch for the UI.
---
Note: the commits in this PR were mostly work in progress to ensure it wasn't lost along the way. The implementation was reworked a bunch of times to where it is now.
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## What's in there?
The Edge runtime [does not support Node.js modules](https://edge-runtime.vercel.app/features/available-apis#unsupported-apis).
When building Next.js application, we currently fail the build when detecting node.js module imported from middleware.
This is an blocker for using code that is conditionally loading node.js modules (based on platform/env detection), as @cramforce reported.
This PR implements a new strategy where:
- we can build such middleware/Edge API route code **with a warning**
- we fail at run time, with graceful errors in dev (console & react-dev-overlay error)
- we fail at run time, with console errors in production
## How to test?
All cases are covered with integration tests.
To try them live, create a simple app with a page, a `middleware.js` file and a `pages/api/route.js`file.
Here are iconic examples:
### node.js modules
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
// static
import { basename } from 'path'
export default async function middleware() {
// dynamic
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
return NextResponse.next()
}
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
// static
import { isAbsolute } from 'path'
export default async function handle() {
// dynamic
const { isAbsolute } = await import('path')
return Response.json({ useNodeModule: isAbsolute('/test') })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired error (+ source code highlight in dev):
> The edge runtime does not support Node.js 'path' module
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
Desired warning at build time:
> A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 2) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] builds middleware successfully, shows build warning, shows desired error on stderr on call
- [x] builds route successfully, shows build warning, shows desired error on stderr on call
### 3rd party modules not found
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
// static
import Unknown from 'unknown'
export default async function middleware() {
// dynamic
const Unknown = await import('unknown')
new Unknown()
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
// static
import Unknown from 'unknown'
export default async function handle() {
// dynamic
const Unknown = await import('unknown')
return Response.json({ use3rdPartyModule: Unknown() })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired error (+ source code highlight in dev):
> Module not found: Can't resolve 'does-not-exist'
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/module-not-found
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] fails to build middleware, with desired error on stderr
- [x] fails to build route, with desired error on stderr
### unused node.js modules
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export default async function middleware() {
if (process.exit) {
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
}
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
export default async function handle() {
if (process.exit) {
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
}
return Response.json({ useNodeModule: false })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired warning at build time:
> A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 2) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
- [x] invoke middleware in dev with no error
- [x] invoke route in dev with no error
- [x] builds successfully, shows build warning, invoke middleware with no error
- [x] builds successfully, shows build warning, invoke api-route with no error
## Notes to reviewers
The strategy to implement this feature is to leverages webpack [externals](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/externals/#externals) and run a global `__unsupported_module()` function when using a node.js module from edge function's code.
For the record, I tried using [webpack resolve.fallback](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/resolve/#resolvefallback) and [Webpack.IgnorePlugin](https://webpack.js.org/plugins/ignore-plugin/) but they do not allow throwing proper errors at runtime that would contain the loaded module name for reporting.
`__unsupported_module()` is defined in `EdgeRuntime`, and returns a proxy that's throw on use (whether it's property access, function call, new operator... synchronous & promise-based styles).
However there's an issue with error reporting: webpack does not includes the import lines in the generated sourcemaps, preventing from displaying useful errors.
I extended our middleware-plugin to supplement the sourcemaps (when analyzing edge function code, it saves which module is imported from which file, together with line/column/source)
The react-dev-overlay was adapted to look for this additional information when the caught error relates to modules, instead of looking at sourcemaps.
I removed the previous mechanism (built by @nkzawa ) which caught webpack errors at built time to change the displayed error message (files `next/build/index.js`, `next/build/utils.ts` and `wellknown-errors-plugin`)
since we no longer have a single compiler for browser & edge, we can enable
source map generation by default for all edge functions. This would make it
much easier to debug and understand what's happening when deploying to prod
as the log statements will show us the actual code location instead of post
bundling and minified location.
This also removes the experimental flag as it's not needed anymore.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR corrects a mistake where a negative number could pass, as a number greater than 0.
This is due to negative numbers being a truthy value in JS.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Right now if people will accidentally export a typo like `runtime: 'experimental-egde'` we will fail silently.
This commit ensures we will throw and fail loudly when such typos occur.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Continue the work in #38310, this PR includes CSS files as chunks in the manifest for each client component, and then make sure the flight client loads the CSS files correctly.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This ensures we create any nested folders necessary when setting initial ISR cache entries with the filesystem cache. Also adds a regression test for this.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/38130
Currently `renderToReadableStream` will be called whenever the component is re-rendered, but the result should actually be cached (per request).
Thanks to @sebmarkbage for pointing out.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Minor fix to recent experimental configs. While the latest next.js includes support for those experimental features, currently it emits warnings like
```
You have defined experimental feature (swcPlugins) in next.config.js that does not exist in this version of Next.js
```
As validation checks the existence of default values even though config itself allows them to be optional. PR does not attempt to change validation logics, only amends it by having empty default values.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
avoid fetching a chunk for api endpoints on middleware redirect.
This still makes a request to the data endpoint, not sure if this is a good idea,
but a rewrite _can_ happen from that data request.
## Related
- Fixes#37944
- Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/37783
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
this makes all `experimental.images` options optional, so they can be toggled individually.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Refactor `runDependingOnPageType`
* Throw specific error when the compiled middleware cannot be found
* Do not render `MiddlewareNotFoundError` on dev
* Allow to invalidate compilers by type
* Show compile errors when middleware fails to build
* Add tests
This PR introduces a new experimental component, `next/future/image`, which is inspired by the existing experimental `layout="raw"`.
The difference is that much of the code has been deleted in order to reduce client-side code as well as reduce complexity:
- No `layout` prop
- No `loader` config (although `loader` prop works)
- No `IntersectionObserver`, use native `loading="lazy"`
- No `lazyBoundary`
- No `lazyRoot`
- No `fill` (yet) so width & height are required
- No `objectFit` (use `style` instead)
- No `objectPosition` (use `style` instead)
This improves performance because native `loading="lazy"` doesn't need to wait for React Hydration and client-side JS.
In a future PR, we will modify `next/image` to remove `layout="raw"` since this new component supersedes it.
## Feature
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This allows configuring / overriding the default options of the `styled-components` swc transform and allows using the `css` prop support, which was already implemented, but not available.
Edit: made the CSS prop transform run before the display name, so it gets picked up by that and receives the (deterministic) name.
Relates to #30802
Lately, `Response.json` was introduced as a standard static method.
That means we can remove our implementation of `NextResponse.json` piggyback on `Response.json`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
- Always perform a full reload when needed without blocking with the overlay.
- Old client warnings re-added.
- Post client warning to dev server and print it in the CLI.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
x-ref: #31506
This PR migrates existing SSR on edge from middleware to edge functions implmentation. So that we can get rid of limitation of middleware and resolve the conflicts between middleware and edge SSR routes.
* Adding edge functions matching route in middleware catch all route,keep the order as `middleware catch all` -> redirects/rewrites -> `edge catch all` -> others
* Dropping middleware related code for edge SSR: removing client info and preflight request handling
This adds a guard for whenever we do a hard navigation over a client-navigation to ensure we aren't redirecting to the same URL that we are currently on as this can cause infinite redirecting. This also fixes some cases with middleware rewrites without i18n enabled and expands our middleware suite to test both with i18n and without.
This also fixes a race condition with the query updating where a user could attempt a route transition and it then gets overridden by the query updating and prevents firing router events during the query updating as these can be false signals of a transition.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/37804
This PR enables Edge API endpoints to receive a body.
This wasn't in the original PR, as thankfully pointed out by @zaiste in [this comment](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37481#discussion_r899440567) 🙏
## Related
- Fixes#37821
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
```js
// next.config.js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
legacyBrowsers: false,
sharedPool: true,
newNextLinkBehavior: false
}
}
```
With the current implementation, using the config above will warn the usage of experimental features. However, those are the preset values that are defined in `defaultConfig` which means actually no experimental feature has been enabled at all.
The PR changes to only check if experimental features are actually enabled (have different values than the ones defined in `defaultConfig`).
### What's in there?
This is a followup of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37695.
For the dev server to clean stacktraces, we're decorating errors caught during code evaluation (`getServerSideProps` or middleware).
However, when these errors are asynchronously raised, we can't decorate them before processing them, leading to this fallback logic:
bf7bf8217f/packages/next/server/dev/next-dev-server.ts (L775-L779)
Thanks to latest improvement of the edge-runtime in 1.1.0-beta.4, we can now catch unhandled rejection and uncaught exception, and decorate them.
### How to test?
Please reuse the existing tests who already covered these cases:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern middleware-dev-errors`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR fixes an issue where we have a middleware that rewrites every single request to the same origin while having `i18n` configured. It would be something like:
```typescript
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(req) {
return NextResponse.rewrite(req.nextUrl)
}
```
In this case we are going to be adding always the `locale` at the beginning of the destination since it is a rewrite. This causes static assets to not match and the whole application to break. I believe this is a potential footgun so in this PR we are addressing the issue by removing the locale from pathname for those cases where we check against the filesystem (e.g. public folder).
To achieve this change, this PR introduces some preparation changes and then a refactor of the logic in the server router. After this refactor we are going to be relying on properties that can be defined in the `Route` to decide wether or not we should remove the `basePath`, `locale`, etc instead of checking which _type_ of route it is that we are matching.
Overall this simplifies quite a lot the server router. The way we are testing the mentioned issue is by adding a default rewrite in the rewrite tests middleware.
In a previous PR (#19032), we added a hard error during `next export` if the default Image Optimization API is being used because it requires a server to optimized on demand. The error message offers several different solutions but it didn't consider that by the time someone runs `next export`, they are probably done writing their app.
So if `next export` is a hard requirement, the quickest path forward is to disable Image Optimization API. So this PR adds a new configuration option to `next.config.js`:
```js
module.exports = {
images: {
unoptimized: true
}
}
```
### Update
Upon further discussion, we might want to avoid doing this just for images and instead introduce a top-level config to indicate export is coming and then handle errors or warn for [unsupported features](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features).
```
module.exports = {
nextExport: true
}
```
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This improves the warning thats printed when you have experimental features enable so its clear which ones are enabled (in parenthesis) and where they are enabled (in next.config.js or next.config.mjs)
## Before
```
warn - You have enabled experimental feature(s).
```
## After
```
warn - You have enabled experimental features (reactRoot, serverComponents, scrollRestoration) in next.config.js.
```
In Middlewares, dynamic code execution is not allowed. Currently, we warn if eval / new Function are invoked in dev but don't warn another dynamic code execution in WebAssembly.
This PR adds warnings for `WebAssembly.compile` and `WebAssembly.instantiate` with a buffer parameter (note that `WebAssembly.instantiate` with a **module** parameter is legit) invocations. Note that other methods that compile WASM dynamically such as `WebAssembly.compileStreaming` are not exposed to users so we don't need to cover them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Improve stack traces in dev mode
* Refactor `react-dev-overlay` to support the Edge Compiler
* Serialize errors including the compiler `source`
* Adopt the new `react-dev-overlay` displaying it for middleware errors
* Improve tests
* fix rsc cases
* update test
* use check for dev test
* handle different error from node version
Co-authored-by: feugy <damien@vercel.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Ensure custom middleware matcher is used correctly in client manifest
* lint-fix
* patch e2e case
* fix rsc case
* update test
* add missing normalize
In a previous PR (#34075), the ISR behavior was introduced to the Image Optimization API, however it changed the cache-control header to always set maxage=0. While this is probably the right behavior (the client shouldn't cache the image), it introduced a regression for users who have CDNs in front of a single Next.js instance (as opposed to [multiple Next.js instances](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching/incremental-static-regeneration#self-hosting-isr)).
Furthermore, the pros of client-side caching outweight the cons because its easy to change the image url (add querystring param for example) to invalidate the cache.
This PR reverts the cache-control behavior until we can come up with a better long-term solution.
- Fixes#35987
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
- Closes#35596
* Re-introduce Edge API Endpoints
This reverts commit 210fa39961, and
re-introduces Edge API endpoints as a possible runtime selection in API
endpoints.
This is done by exporting a `config` object:
```ts
export config = { runtime: 'edge' }
```
Note: `'edge'` will probably change into `'experimental-edge'` to show
that this is experimental and the API might change in the future.
* Support `experimental-edge`, but allow `edge` too
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This ensures we use the correct dynamic route params favoring params from the URL/matched-path over route-matches. This also ensures we properly cache `_next/data` requests client side when the page is not a `getServerSideProps` page.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37574
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR builds on the work from @hattakdev (PR went stale: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/14499) and adds a new `integration` test for the new warning.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## To run locally
1. `pnpm build`
2. `pnpm testonly test/integration/export-getInitialProps-warn/test/index.test.js`
Fixes#13946
## Notes
<details>
<summary>Click to toggle see</summary>
I know the `contributing.md` doc said to avoid adding new tests to `integration`. It also said new tests should be written in TypeScript.
I wasn't sure where to put the tests for this so I went with `integration`. I also didn't see many other tests written in TS in this part of the codebase so I stuck with `.js`.
</details>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Strip next internal queries in inline flight response
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
* Update to process redirects/rewrites for _next/data
* correct matched-path resolving with middleware
* Add next-data header
* migrate middleware tests
* lint-fix
* update error case
* update test case
* Handle additional resolving cases and add more tests
* update test from merge
* fix test
* rm .only
* apply changes from review
* ensure _next/data resolving does not apply without middleware
* Fix react root env missing in NextServer
* switch to useId instead of using process.env var
* add production test
* extend timeout
* fix test
* fix lint
* use version to detect if enable react root
This PR moves the internal logic associated with `req.ua` into an explicit method the user should to call to have the same behavior.
**before**
```typescript
// middleware.ts
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const url = request.nextUrl
const viewport = request.ua.device.type === 'mobile' ? 'mobile' : 'desktop'
url.searchParams.set('viewport', viewport)
return NextResponse.rewrites(url)
}
```
**after**
```typescript
// middleware.ts
import { NextRequest, NextResponse, userAgent } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const url = request.nextUrl
const { device } = userAgent(request)
const viewport = device.type === 'mobile' ? 'mobile' : 'desktop'
url.searchParams.set('viewport', viewport)
return NextResponse.rewrites(url)
}
```
This potentially will save the extra 17 kB related to the size of `ua-parser-js`
* Refactor data fetching to support getting headers
* Relax `getNextPathnameInfo` type
* Add test for middleware internal redirects
* Export `ParsedRelativeUrl` type
* Refactor `getMiddlewareEffects`
* Move rewrite i18n test to middleware rewrite tests
* Fix bug parsing pathname info
* Normalize data requests to page requests for middleware
* Ensure there is a header `x-nextjs-matched-path` for middleware rewrites on data requests
* Extract `getDataHref` to a function
* Stop using `getDataHref` for flight
* Always set the query in `dataHref` independently of if it is SSG
* Add test for recursive rewrites
* Refactor dynamicPath validation to `matchHrefAndAsPath`
* Add `dataHref` to `FetchDataOutput`
* Extract `matchesMiddleware` function
* Add `hasMiddleware` option to `fetchNextData`
* Move preflight test
* Remove preflight test
* Add middleware prefetch tests
* Remove preflight
* Attempt to reduce bundle size
Include `withMiddlewareEffects` and `matchHrefAndAsPath` into `router`
Bring `getDataHref` back to `page-loader`
Bring `resolveDynamicRoute` back to `router`
* Reduce arg duplication for `withMiddlewareEffects`
* Remove some async/await and spreads to reduce bundle size
* Upgrade `edge-runtime` & clone `Request` on redirects to mutate headers
* Add some rewrite tests
Co-authored-by: Kiko Beats <josefrancisco.verdu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Bug
fixes#37106
Please note that, as for `pages/` the `src/middleware` file is ignored when `/middleware` is present.
## How to test
1. Rebuild next.js `pnpm build`
2. Run dedicated tests: `pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern middleware-src/`
There was a bug that ignored `Request` options when one was given to the `fetch` function:
```ts
const request = new Request("https://example.vercel.sh", { method: "POST" });
await fetch(request);
```
The code above was expected to make a `POST` request, but instead it
made a `GET` request.
This commit fixes it and adds some tests to verify that fetching with a
`Request` object works as expected, and therefore resolves#37123.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #37483`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Duplicate locales will lead to an obscure error message at build time, here I caught them earlier.
Using a Set sounded the terser and fastest approach, but it won't tell which locale is duplicated.
Also I've noticed that the "Array.isArray" check happens twice on i18n.locales? Maybe it's on purpose?
Fixes#37483
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix custom head on getInitialProps works with React 18
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR will allow Middleware to set its matcher through `export const config = { matching: ... }`
## Related
* This PR is rebased off #37121
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Adopt the new `moduleMap` option added in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/24629, which helps us getting rid of our hacky implementation injected to `globalThis.__next_require__`. The map will be attached to the flight manifest as `__ssr_module_mapping__`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Feature
This PR introduces the ability to provide `runtime: "edge"` in API endpoints, the same as the experimental RSC runtime configurations.
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Continuation of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37258 this moves the LRU cache to the `file-system-cache` so that any different cache handlers don't need to disable the LRU cache as this may cause inconsistencies with some cache handlers that need to be the source of truth.
This PR introduces [Edge Runtime](https://edge-runtime.vercel.app/) for emulating [Edge Functions](https://vercel.com/features/edge-functions) locally.
Every time you run a [middleware](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/middleware) locally via `next dev`, an isolated edge runtime context will be created.
These contexts have the same constraints as production servers, plus they don't pollute the global scope; Instead, all the code run in a vm on top of a Node.js process.
Additionally, `@edge-runtime/jest-environment` has been added to make easier testing Edge Functions in a programmatic way.
It dropped the following polyfills from Next.js codebase, since they are now part of Edge Runtime:
- abort-controller
- formdata
- uuid
- web-crypto
- web-streams
Co-authored-by: Gal Schlezinger <2054772+Schniz@users.noreply.github.com>
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using fixes#33829
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This refactors the `incremental-cache` and moves the file-system cache handling to it's own cache handler allowing it to be replaced by a custom cache handler (experimental).
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/22619
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Do not exclude internal _next request in middleware
* Allow for `NextURL` to parse prefetch requests
* Add test for middleware data prefetch
* Refactor `hasBasePath` and `replaceBasePath`
* Refactor `removeTrailingSlash`
* Refactor parsed next url to use `getNextPathnameInfo`
* Allow to configure `NextURL`
* Ensure middleware rewrites with always with a locale
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Another strategy to do achieve the goal of #36995. With this PR the module IDs will be:
- (1) RSC: named (_this one doesn't matter_)
- (2) SSR: named
- (3) Client: deterministic
And we include the client module IDs in the flight manifest, as well as an extra mapping of 3) → 2) so during SSR it can require the correct module still.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
