Some users reported false hits when using complex loaders that implement Art Direction.
We can relax the warnings so that query string params named width should not warn.
This will ensure an image hashed consistently regardless of how its imported:
- `import file from "./file.png"` -> /_next/static/media/file.12345678.png
- `url(./file.png)` -> /_next/static/media/file.12345678.png
- `new URL("./file.png", import.meta.url)` -> /_next/static/media/file.12345678.png
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
As a follow up to #30041 which changed `<div>` to `<span>`, this PR makes sure that unexpected styles are not applied to the image wrapper or sizer spans.
For example: `.content span {}` would apply to all spans and incorrectly style the image wrapper.
This PR adds [`all: initial`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/all) to effectively reset the span styles.
* fix: Prevent image redirection when trailingSlash is set
* test: Trailing slash test for next/image
* lint-fix
Co-authored-by: Gustavo Edinger <gbe@nect.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Bump `squoosh` to the latest version, currently commit [cad09160](cad09160b6).
Ideally, we would use the version published to npm but it hasn't been published in [two months](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@squoosh/lib?activeTab=versions) and we have a patch (#23565) that isn't available upstream.
This also is a precursor to getting support for AVIF.
- Fixes#27092
- Fixes#26527
- Reapplies the patch from #23565
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/29307 this ensures the `blurDataURL` is correctly prefixed with the `basePath` in development since we use the `_next/image` endpoint to generate the placeholder in dev mode.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29289#issuecomment-927758204
This ensures we prefix the `src` for static images with the `basePath` correctly, this also copies over the static image tests to the basePath image-component suite.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29289
Adds tests to the Image component to verify that the correct data is being exposed.
Based on #27899 and #28312
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This PR does a few things:
- Moves `<noscript>` usage below the blur image since so that the `<noscript>` image renders on top of the blur image
- Remove the `isVisible` check for `<noscript>` since we can't rely on client-side JS
- Add `loading=lazy` to the `<noscript>` image to take advantage of native lazy loading (can't rely on JS lazy loading)
Fixes#28251
This PR resurrects #23622 which has not been updated in a while. Makes the `Image` component handle `blob:` object urls.
closes#23622fixes#19291
credits: @sdn90
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This PR introduces an improved developer experience when `next lint` is run for the first time.
### Current behavior
`eslint-config-next` is a required package that must be installed before proceeding with `next lint` or `next build`:
Although this has helped many developers start using the new ESLint config, this has also resulted in a few issues:
- Users are required to install the full config (`eslint-config-next`) even if they do not use it or use the Next.js plugin directly (`eslint-plugin-next`).
- #26348
- There's some confusion on why `eslint-config-next` needs to be installed or how it should be used instead of `eslint-plugin-next`.
- #26574
- #26475
- #26438
### New behavior
Instead of enforcing `eslint-config-next` as a required package, this PR prompts the user by asking what config they would like to start. This happens when `next lint` is run for the first time **and** if no ESLint configuration is detected in the application.
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/124331177-e1668a80-db5c-11eb-8915-38d3dc20f5d4.gif" width="800" />
- The CLI will take care of installing `eslint` or `eslint-config-next` if either is not already installed
- Users now have the option to choose between a strict configuration (`next/core-web-vitals`) or just the base configuration (`next`)
- For users that decide to create their own ESLint configuration, or already have an existing one, **installing `eslint-config-next` will not be a requirement for `next lint` or `next build` to run**. A warning message will just show if the Next.js ESLint plugin is not detected in an ESLint config.
<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-25 at 3 02 12 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/123473329-6cc4a680-d5c6-11eb-9a57-d5c0b89a2732.png">
---
In addition, this PR also:
- Fixes#26348
- Updates documentation to make it more clear what approach to take for new and existing ESLint configurations
We've never supported the `style` prop as seen in the docs https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/image#other-props
TS users already get a build error but JS users were left in the dark.
This PR adds a warning so its clear during `next dev`.
This PR adds `lazyBoundary` prop on Image Component.
This feature is to load the images earlier.
I'm not good at English. So, I couldn't explain enough in the documentation what `lazyBoundary` is.
Feature request: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/24552
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
We shouldn't be setting `placeholder=blur` styles when JS is disabled because we'll have no way to know when the image is loaded and it will be stuck in blur permanently as mentioned in [this comment](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/19052#issuecomment-882886068).
This PR avoids blur styles on the `<noscript>` version of the image.
### Description
This changes the strict TS types to a looser implementation such that the user can pass `src` without TS errors.
### Pros vs Cons
- **Pros**: better support for wrapping `next/image` so that TS won't report false errors
- **Cons**: using `src: string` without `blurDataURL` will no longer show TS errors and instead fail with a runtime error
### Issues
- Fixes#26892
- Related to #26991
### Description
This changes the strict TS types to a looser implementation such that the user can always pass `width` and `height` (even when `layout=fill`) without TS errors.
### Pros vs Cons
- **Pros**: better support for wrapping `next/image` so that TS won't report false errors with `layout=fill`
- **Cons**: omitting width/height when using other `layout` will no longer show TS errors and instead fail with a runtime error
### Issues
- Fixes#26531
- Fixes#25440
fixes#19074
This change disables image lazy-loading when both of the following are true:
1) A image is being rendered following a client-side page transition
2) The image has been previously loaded during this session.
Before this change, all images with lazy-loading enabled have a visible flicker during client-side page transitions, even though they're already loaded.
With this change, there's are two performance risks:
1) There's a chance that some offscreen images will have lazy-loading disabled unnecessarily because they were previously loaded. I think the performance hit here is pretty negligible and the situation is unlikely to come up very often.
2) There's a chance a different-sized version of the image will be selected by the browser, but lazy-loading will be disabled anyway. This seems even more unlikely to me, and anyway the performance hit from a stray un-lazy-loaded image (on a client-side transition) is very minor.
In both cases, I think the performance risk is outweighed by the UX improvement of getting rid of the image flicker on page transition.
If the `Image` src url had existing query params, the imgix loader would simply append another query string with `?` causing both query strings to break.
This PR adds a way to safely merge query strings if needed using [URLSearchParams](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/URLSearchParams).
## Bug
- [X] fixes#26288
- [X] Integration tests added
fixes#26607
This change makes it so the image loader plugin only emits a file while processing an image import for the client. The final generated image URL was already the same in SSR and CSR anyway, so this change doesn't have any functional impact.
I also changed the name of the static page in the image component tests, since it was causing some conflicts with the static assets folder.
This adds a new prop, `onLoadingComplete()`, to handle the most common use case of `ref`.
I also added docs and a warning when using `ref` so we recommend the new prop instead.
- Fixes#18398
- Fixes#22482
This PR does a couple things:
1. Omit svg static imports if the user has defined custom webpack config with svg rule
2. Change TS type to `any` for svg imports to avoid conflicts with other plugins
The idea is that some users want to use `next/image` with static imports for most image types but not for svg and instead inline those images with a plugin.
- Fixes#25950
- Fixes#26130
- Fixes#26176
- Fixes#26196
- Fixes#26067
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using Fixes#26130
- [x] Integration tests added
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #26135 `
- [x] Integration tests added
fixes#26135
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #26135 `
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
In the `noscript` img version the correct `src` and `sizes` attributes are overwritten by not necessary inline declaration; in particular using the loaders the `src` attribute not take the right absolute path. I found this issue using a custom loader and because my site didn't indexing any images on the Google image search.
Fixes#24277
There are strict conditions for using `placeholder=blur` documented in #25949 but this will give the user a better understanding during `next dev` and links to the error.
- Error when `placeholder=blur` and no `blurDataURL`
- The Error for small images with `placeholder=blur` has been changed to a warning
- Added support for blurring a webp image
- Added error page linking to relevant docs
* Add delay to placeholder removal
* Increase jest timeout for image tests
* Use check instead of immediately expecting the result
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <timneutkens@me.com>
Previously we were accepting a `s=1` query string parameter for static imports, but this is not necessary.
Instead, this PR looks at the file path to determine if the header should be `immutable`.
The nice thing here is we don't need to worry about someone trying `s=1` with an external image or 3rd party loader. In that case, we use the upstream `Cache-Control` header as usual.
This change also ensures we don't add the `immutable` header for `next dev`.
Related to PR #24993
