### Why?
I really dislike the way `.chain` works right now, it shouldn't mutate
the `BrowserInterface`, this PR changes it so it's just a pure chain
without weird side effects.
One example with the current version (before this PR):
```
const el = browser.elementByCss('#version-2')
await el.text()
// throws
await el.text()
```
### Additional Changes
- removes selenium (which is completely unused)
- updates playwright
- makes the playwright tracing not error all the time
### What?
When navigating to a new page with fixed or sticky positioned element as the first element, we were bailing on scroll to top behavior, which often isn't expected.
### Why?
Currently, we decide to bail on scroll to top behavior on navigation if the content that is swapped into view is visible within the viewport. Since fixed/sticky positioned elements are often intended to be relative to the current viewport, it's most likely not the case that you'd want it to be considered in this heuristic. For example, if you were scrolled far down on a page, and you navigated to a page that makes use of a sticky header, you would not be scrolled to the top of the page because that sticky header is technically visible within the viewport.
### How?
I've updated the previous implementation that was intended to skip targeting invisible elements to also skip over fixed or sticky elements. This should help by falling back to the next level of the layout tree to determine which element to scroll to.
I've deleted the `// TODO-APP` comments as I couldn't think of a scenario in which we'd need a global scrollTop handler -- if we've bailed on every element up the tree, it's likely the page wasn't scrollable.
Some additional considerations:
- Is the warning helpful or annoying?
- Is the parallel route trade-off an acceptable one? (ie, a parallel modal slot might not be considered in the content visibility check unless if it’s fixed positioned)
Closes NEXT-1393
Fixes#47475
### What
Support `scroll={false}` for Link component in app router. This can be
used when you don't need to scroll back to top again when route url
changes. For instance hash query changes, if you want to keep the
scrolling as it is, you can use this option.
### How
Handling the `scroll` option in navigation reducer on client side.
Fixes#50105
Fixes NEXT-1377
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
## What?
Removes `experimental.appDir` this was leftover from when I flipped the
switch.
Kept the config file as in the future we might add future flags and
such. It also helps that it has the types comment included so you always
get types.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
Whenever you navigated and a page suspended through `loading` or an error happened caught by `error` in the first level of segments (e.g. `/dashboard` but not `/dashboard/settings`) scroll would not be applied. This happened because the focus and scroll handling component is rendered as part of `InnerLayoutRouter` and the Suspense / Error boundary was rendered **around** `InnerLayoutRouter`. This behavior is incorrect as we still want to immediately scroll to the place where the loading is rendered.
This PR fixes the behavior by allowing the scroll to apply to loading / error too.
### How?
Moved the scrolling component around the loading/error/innerlayout boundary and added tests.
### What?
Mux reported they're experiencing a specific case where scroll wasn't
applied. I've found a bug when the first element in a layout or page,
the one that React will return from `findDOMNode`, is display: hidden.
At that point the rect is is `0` `0` `0` `0` and the current logic
assumes that means it's in the viewport as it's top `0`.
In order to fix this I've looked at a few ways:
- Scrolling to top when the element is not visible
- Scrolling to the parent element that is visible
- **Scrolling to the closest sibling (nextSibling) of the element that
is visible**
Eventually I landed on the third option after looking at the Mux case,
my reproduction, and the way vercel.com's pages leveraging App Router
are structured.
### How?
Used a while loop to check if the domNode is visible, if not we continue
to the next sibling until one that is visible is found. If none are
found we bail on resolving further.
While looking into this it highlighted that we should add a global
scroll handler in app-router too for the case where none of the
layout-routers apply scroll. With this fix that is less urgent though so
I've added a todo.
Fixes NEXT-1056
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Follow-up to #45555. This uses the same handling of mutable for
serverPatchReducer and refreshReducer.
Fixes NEXT-213
Ensures scroll position is still applied when calling `router.push()`
and `router.refresh()` in a single transition:
```tsx
startTransition(() => {
router.push('/dashboard')
router.refresh()
})
```
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Kaifer <jan@kaifer.cz>
- Add support for scrolling to the sides and down when navigating
- Add tests for vertical scrolling
- Add tests for horizontal scrolling
- Add tests for `router.refresh()`
- should not scroll by itself
- should not block router.push from scrolling
- should not scroll when page refreshed using fash refresh
- Scroll to the top of document if that gets page into viewport
- I didn't want to implement some heuristics on if we can scroll to the top of the page so I just scroll there and check.
- This implementation may not play well with some nested scrollable containers (but that never worked, just FYI)
- Improved typings on `BrowserInterface` a little - backward compatible change.
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
