Follow-up on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38534#pullrequestreview-1035020450
This lets us use modern JS/TS syntax in ESLint rules and avoid issues like #38530 and #36693
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#33072
I documented all `esXXX` features to be sure that they were already polyfilled. Only `es2019` feature `Object.fromEntries` is not already polyfilled by nextjs.
I added some unwanted polyfill (that are polyfilled by nextjs).
I kept the `es5`, `es6` and `es2015` "as-is" as they contain functions that does not seem to be explicitly polyfilled (all `Math` functions or `Date.now` for example) in the [polyfill file](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/master/packages/next-polyfill-nomodule/src/index.js)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Adds tests to ensure `eslint-plugin-next`'s available rules are properly exported and recommended rules are defined correctly.
* Condenses imports.
* Sets default recommended value.
* replace Object.hasOwn for node 14
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Readds `@next/next/no-assign-module-variable` ESLint rule that was inadvertently removed in #34335 during the resolution of many merge conflicts.
This PR will get us back to a good / working state. I'll see if I can add a test to ensure all rule are accounted for in a separate PR.
Fixes#34335.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This rule was good and kinda made sense when we had nested Middleware.
Now that we have a single Middleware, one might extract logic into different places
and I don't think we should limit importing `NextResponse` or `NextRequest`.
## Related
- Closes#36239
- Closes#37309
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This PR deprecates declaring a middleware under `pages` in favour of the project root naming it after `middleware` instead of `_middleware`. This is in the context of having a simpler execution model for middleware and also ships some refactor work. There is a ton of a code to be simplified after this deprecation but I think it is best to do it progressively.
With this PR, when in development, we will **fail** whenever we find a nested middleware but we do **not** include it in the compiler so if the project is using it, it will no longer work. For production we will **fail** too so it will not be possible to build and deploy a deprecated middleware. The error points to a page that should also be reviewed as part of **documentation**.
Aside from the deprecation, this migrates all middleware tests to work with a single middleware. It also splits tests into multiple folders to make them easier to isolate and work with. Finally it ships some small code refactor and simplifications.
Changes to the beforeInteractive strategy to make it work for streaming
Splitting `beforeInteractive` into two strategies `beforeInteractive` at the _document level and `beforePageRender` for page level <Scripts>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes#34030.
The PR is still WIP as the test case hasn't been added, help or change is welcome.
cc @no-ya @ijjk
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds a development mode warning in the console
if you try to include <script> tags in next/head, e.g.
```
<Head>
<script async src="..." />
</Head>
```
The warning message explains that this pattern will not
work well with Suspense/streaming and recommends using the
next/script component instead.
TODO in follow-up PR: add same warning for stylesheets, etc
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
fixes#32178
the `inline-script-id` eslint rule crashed when encountering a `JSXSpreadAttribute`. this pr fixes that, and also handles `id` being passed via the spreaded object.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] ~~Integration~~ Unit tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This fixes broken links in the eslint output by removing the trailing full stop.
It also makes the formatting of (the output of) the various rules consistent.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
> I don't think this is a bug, nor a feature, nor is it really documentation.
> It's just a small nuisance that I bumped into and felt compelled to fix.
> I went with documentation as that seems the closest match
## What does this pull request do?
The elslint output of `eslint-plugin-next` contains useful links to the documentation about the various rules.
Unfortunately, on most (but not all) rules, those links are immediately followed by a full stop (`.`).
The terminal (or any parser) has no way of knowing that the full stop is not part of the URL.
So it includes it and clicking the link leads to a 404 on the nextjs.org website.
This PR fixes that by removing the full stop.
## But a final full stop is better grammar
I considered alternatives (such as [a zero-width space character](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-width_space#Prohibited_in_URLs)) in case the final full stop was part of the style guide or something.
However, as I went through the eslint rules, I notices that the messages for various rules were formatted inconsistently.
Some with final full stop, some without.
As such, I made the all consistent with this structure:
> [message]. See: [url]
I feel this is a better solution than using the zero-width space as these sort of invisible characters
in code can be a red flag that something fishy is going on.
I submit this pull request in the hope it will be useful, and a positive contribution to a project I have a great deal of appreciation for.
That being said, I fully understand if people would consider this a non-issue.
When an `a` tag is used to link to an internal page, but the `target="_blank"` attribute is present, ESLint should not report it as an error and should not enforce using `next/link`.
Fixes#28547
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
People have been reporting on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/30973 that the `no-server-import-in-page` eslint rule is reporting false positives for `_middleware` files inside sub-page folders.
Unlike `_document`, we can have multiple `_middleware` files.
Fixes#32121
The rule [`no-html-link-for-pages`](https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-html-link-for-pages) will incorrectly flag an `<a>`-tag intended to download a local asset. This PR adds an exception to the rule for any anchor element with a `download` attribute.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Make the `no-unwanted-polyfillio` rule respond to the `next/script` component as well as the `script` tag.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] ~Integration~Unit tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes#28635
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
* Move unit tests to one folder
* Migrate unit tests to TypeScript
* add test types to lint
* Ensure ts(x) tests are run with util
* Add tsx extension to jest config
* bump
