Re-do of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40251
Edge SSR'd routes cold boot performances are proportional to the
executed code size.
In order to improve it, we are trying to optimize for the bundle size of
a packed Edge SSR route.
This PR adds ESM compilation targets for all Next.js dist packages and
use them to bundle Edge SSR'd route.
This allows us to leverage the better tree shaking/DCE for ESM modules
in webpack in order to decrease the overall bundle size.
This PR also enables minifying Edge SSR routes. Since we don't control
which minifier might be used later (if any), it's best if we provide an
already optimised bundle.
<img width="903" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/190005211-b7cb2c58-a56a-44b0-8ee4-fd3f603e41bd.png">
This is a 10ms cold boot win per my benchmarking script, which I'll put
in a subsequent PR.
Not done yet:
- ~~swap exported requires in `next/link` (and others) etc to point them
to the esm modules version~~
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. In order
to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for
the change that you're making: -->
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
This reverts commit 11deaaa82b.
Temporarily reverts the above commit due to breaking middleware/edge
functions once deployed.
Fixes:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3133433920/jobs/5087331787
cc @shuding @feedthejim
```sh
[GET] /blog/first
13:56:56:61
2022-09-27T20:56:56.671Z 61d43a6a-34a1-40c0-b71f-4ae5d1918431 ERROR /var/task/node_modules/next/dist/esm/client/router.js:1
/* global window */ import React from 'react';
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module
at Object.compileFunction (node:vm:352:18)
at wrapSafe (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1033:15)
at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1069:27)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1159:10)
at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:981:32)
at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:822:12)
at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1005:19)
at require (node:internal/modules/cjs/helpers:102:18)
at Object.<anonymous> (/var/task/node_modules/next/router.js:3:7)
at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1105:14)
```
This PR adds a new `experimental.enableUndici` option to let the
developer switch from `next-fetch` to `undici` as the underlying
polyfill for `fetch` in Node.js.
In the current implementation, Next.js makes sure that `fetch` is always
available by using `node-fetch`. However, we do not polyfill in Node.js
18+, since those versions come with their own `fetch` implementation
already, built-in.
Node.js 18+ uses `undici` under the hood, so letting the developer use
`undici` earlier could make the migration easier later on.
Eventually, we hope to be able to stop polyfilling `fetch` in an
upcoming major version of Next.js, shipping less code.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: Sukka <isukkaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
As discussed with @sebmarkbage, the handling is more about showing a not found component than it is about a specific status code as these can come in late with streaming.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Merge e2e tests customized `node_modules` with installed `node_modules`,
to let you debug easily locally without moving folder between
`node_modules` and `node_modules_bak`
Also add `optoutServerComponentsBundle` to config schema.
Since React 18 returning `undefined` from components is allowed which renders to `undefined` in the RSC response so we need a separate prop to know if the loading boundary was provided.
Thanks to @finn-orsini who reported this problem.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Currently, a developer building a website using Next.js could write this
code with no type errors:
```tsx
<Image
width="kangaroo"
height="100px"
quality="medium"
{...rest}
/>
```
This PR adds stricter type checking, which will catch this type of error
earlier.
Similarly, this PR adds stricter types for the `responseLimit`, to
ensure the types align to:
https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/api-routes-response-size-limit
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
# Context
Edge SSR'd routes cold boot performances are proportional to the
executed code size.
In order to improve it, we are trying to optimize for the bundle size of
a packed Edge SSR route.
This PR adds ESM compilation targets for all Next.js dist packages and
use them to bundle Edge SSR'd route.
This allows us to leverage the better tree shaking/DCE for ESM modules
in webpack in order to decrease the overall bundle size.
This PR also enables minifying Edge SSR routes. Since we don't control
which minifier might be used later (if any), it's best if we provide an
already optimised bundle.
<img width="903" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/190005211-b7cb2c58-a56a-44b0-8ee4-fd3f603e41bd.png">
This is a 10ms cold boot win per my benchmarking script, which I'll put
in a subsequent PR.
Not done yet:
- ~~swap exported requires in `next/link` (and others) etc to point them
to the esm modules version~~
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Follow-up for #40739 to add an option to opt-out specific packages from being bundled.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
When navigating from app to pages, we do a flight render on the server
to generate the redirected path. However due to our new bundling
strategy we can't use the bundled `ComponentMod.renderToReadableStream`
because the component is now a regular component, not a RSC. In that
case we have to import the unbundled flight server.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This updates to ensure we properly error during static generation when a
non-dynamic SSR error is thrown so that unexpected errors are not
tolerated. This also fixes the static generation async storage not being
shared correctly due to different instances being created during
bundling.
For some context:
[https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509)
Continuation of #40221 and #40227
Adds `experimental.fontLoaders`.
SWC next-font-loaders (#40221) transforms font loader (e.g. #40227) call
expressions into an import with the function call arguments as a query.
The imports will be matched by `next-font-loader`. It runs the
configured font loaders - emits font files and returns CSS. Exports are
added, and the font-family is made locally scoped. The returned CSS is
turned into a CSS module with `css-loader` which lets you consume the
font-family.
`FontLoaderManifestPlugin` creates a manifest of the preloaded font
files for each entrypoint. Preload/preconnect are then added in
`_document.tsx` if any font files were found for that path.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
For some context:
https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509
Adds `@next/font` package.
`scripts/update-google-fonts.js` generates functions and metadata for
all available google fonts. The metadata is used in `loader.ts` to
validate font options (from #40221). It then fetches the CSS from google
fonts, downloads the font files and emits them as static assets.
The actual integration with `packages/next` and integration tests
depends on #40221, will follow up with new PR.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
`config.experimental.serverComponents` is currently required to be
enabled or disabled together with `config.experimental.appDir` (which
means `serverComponents === appDir` otherwise it will throw) so there is
no reason to keep both of them. This PR removes `serverComponents` from
Next.js and only rely on `appDir` instead.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR changes the external module resolution to eagerly bundle
node_modules, and some specific Next.js internal modules, if on the
`WEBPACK_LAYERS.server` layer. While resolving corresponding packages,
we use the `react-server` export condition (fallbacks to default).
A follow-up PR will be adding a Next.js option to opt-out specific
packages from being bundled on the server layer.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Leverages `AsyncLocalStorage` when available for handling static generation context and falls back to requiring render to be isolated when `AsyncLocalStorage` is not available.
Note: most changes are spacing so toggling to ignore spacing may make reviewing easier
Ensures Flight responses are not loaded as HTML.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Feature
Change server components convention from using `.server.js` / `.client.js` file extension to determine it's a server or client component to using `'client'` js literal as a directive for determine client components boundary.
React RFC: https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/189
New behavior doesn't consume `.server.js` as server components any more, if you're enabling `serverComponents` flag, every `page.js` in app dir will become server components by default. If you adding a `'client'` directive to the page, then that page will become a client component. This rule also applies to the normal js components, client components will require a `'client'` directive to indicate its identity, instead of having a `.client.js` extension.
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
- [ ] -->
## Feature
- [x] Implements https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/40112
- [x] Integration tests added
Adds a new option to the current font optimization to enable
experimental font size adjust
The new `optimizeFonts` config will be
```
optimizeFonts: {
inlineFonts: true,
experimentalAdjustFallbacks: false,
},
```
To enable the feature, set `experimentalAdjustFallbacks: true`
`optimizeFonts: false` will disable the entire feature (including
inlining google font definition)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
x-ref: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/25267
Bump the version of `react-server-dom-webpack` and use `experimental_use` to unwrap the promise to access RSC payload instead of using `readRoot`. `readRoot` is removed from the response type.
This masks flight parameters from middleware so it doesn't interfere with RSC or routing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
Such bots typically navigate websites using hard navigations (as they
crawl one URL at a time). Respectively, they do not benefit from
prefetches at all, while increasing the cost of both the crawl and
operating the site.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
### 📖 What's in there?
Dynamic code evaluation (`eval()`, `new Function()`, ...) is not
supported on the edge runtime, hence why we fail the build when
detecting such statement in the middleware or `experimental-edge` routes
at build time.
However, there could be false positives, which static analysis and
tree-shaking can not exclude:
- `qs` through these dependencies (get-intrinsic:
[source](https://github.com/ljharb/get-intrinsic/blob/main/index.js#L12))
- `function-bind`
([source](https://github.com/Raynos/function-bind/blob/master/implementation.js#L42))
- `has`
([source](https://github.com/tarruda/has/blob/master/src/index.js#L5))
This PR leverages the existing `config` export to let user allow some of
their files.
it’s meant for allowing users to import 3rd party modules who embed
dynamic code evaluation, but do not use it (because or code paths), and
can't be tree-shaked.
By default, it’s keeping the existing behavior: warn in dev, fails to
build.
If users allow dynamic code, and that code is reached at runtime, their
app stills breaks.
### 🧪 How to test?
- (existing) integration tests for disallowing dynamic code evaluation:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-dynamic`
- (new) integration tests for allowing dynamic code evaluation: `pnpm
testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-configurable`
- (amended) production tests for validating the new configuration keys:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=config-validations`
To try it live, you could have an application such as:
```js
// lib/index.js
/* eslint-disable no-eval */
export function hasUnusedDynamic() {
if ((() => false)()) {
eval('100')
}
}
export function hasDynamic() {
eval('100')
}
// pages/index.jsx
export default function Page({ edgeRoute }) {
return <p>{edgeRoute}</p>
}
export const getServerSideProps = async (req) => {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:3000/api/route`)
const data = await res.json()
return { props: { edgeRoute: data.ok ? `Hi from the edge route` : '' } }
}
// pages/api/route.js
import { hasDynamic } from '../../lib'
export default async function handle() {
hasDynamic()
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge' ,
allowDynamic: '/lib/**'
}
```
Playing with `config.allowDynamic`, you should be able to:
- build the app even if it uses `eval()` (it will obviously fail at
runtime)
- build the app that _imports but does not use_ `eval()`
- run the app in dev, even if it uses `eval()` with no warning
### 🆙 Notes to reviewers
Before adding documentation and telemetry, I'd like to collect comments
on a couple of points:
- the overall design for this feature: is a list of globs useful and
easy enough?
- should the globs be relative to the application root (current
implementation) to to the edge route/middleware file?
- (especially to @sokra) is the implementation idiomatic enough? I've
leverage loaders to read the _entry point_ configuration once, then the
ModuleGraph to get it back during the parsing phase. I couldn't re-use
the existing `getExtractMetadata()` facility since it's happening late
after the parsing.
- there's a glitch with `import { ServerRuntime } from '../../types'` in
`get-page-static-info.ts`
([here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539/files#diff-cb7ac6392c3dd707c5edab159c3144ec114eafea92dad5d98f4eedfc612174d2L12)).
I had to use `next/types` because it was failing during lint. Any clue
why?
### ☑️ Checklist
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Found that the cause was that `React.useId()` returns the same value across requests whereas it was being used to create a unique key. On further inspection that code could be removed altogether as `id` was not used client-side and the `rscCache` map is no longer needed as the flight instance is already being created per request so it can live in the context of the request execution.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This ensures we ignore all except the files/directories we are explicitly wanting to watch to prevent watching/considering directories with massive amounts of files slowing down startup.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38483#issuecomment-1242154665
Added missing trace for `client-full-reload` event in hot reloader. Full
reload tests moved to hmr, think they make more sense there than on
their own.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This serves to add support for [Subresource
Integrity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity)
hashes for scripts added from the new app directory. This also has
support for utilizing nonce values passed from request headers (expected
to be generated per request in middleware) in the bootstrapping scripts
via the `Content-Security-Policy` header as such:
```
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'nonce-2726c7f26c'
```
Which results in the inline scripts having a new `nonce` attribute hash
added. These features combined support for setting an aggressive Content
Security Policy on scripts loaded.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
For edge routes in app dir, we passed the page name as url so that the
url will be incorrect:
* a non-dynamic route `/dashboard` will become `/dashboard/page`
* a dynamic route `/dynamic/[id]` with url `/dyanmic/123` will still hit
`/dynamic/page/[id]/page`
This PR uses normalized `params.page` with interoplated as correct
pathname for the page.
Given the change in #40076, when a middleware rewrites into an Edge
API route and changes the querystring, the changed querystring does
not appear in the incoming NextRequest object in the Edge API route
```ts
// middleware.ts
export function middleware(req: NextRequest) {
const url = req.nextUrl;
url.pathname = "/api/hello";
url.searchParams.set("foo", "bar");
return NextResponse.rewrite(url);
}
// pages/api/hello.ts
import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
export default function handler(req: NextRequest) {
return NextResponse.json(req.nextUrl.searchParams.get("foo"));
}
export const config = { runtime: "experimental-edge" };
```
Our expectation when requesting `/api/hello` is to see `"bar"`,
but instead we are getting `null` back.
This commit fixes this issue by reading the given `query` instead of using
the initial querystring provided with the user request (prior to rewriting)
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Makes it possible to switch between edge/server runtime in dev without
breaking the server.
Fixes slack:
[1](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1659082535540549)
[2](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02CDC2ALJH/p1658978287244359)
[3](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1656869427468779)
#### middleware-plugin.ts
`middlewareManifest` moved from module scope to local scope. Stale state
from earlier builds ended up in `middleware-manifest.json`. Functions
that changed from edge to server runtime stayed in the manifest as edge
functions.
#### on-demand-entry-handler.ts
When a server or edge entry is added we check if it has switched
runtime. If that's the case the old entry is removed.
#### Reproduce
Create edge API route and visit `/api/hello`
```js
// pages/api/hello.js
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge',
}
export default () => new Response('Hello')
```
Change it to a server api route and visit `/api/hello`, it will explode.
```js
// pages/api/hello.js
export default function (req, res) {
res.send('Hello')
}
```
#### Bug not fixed
One EDGE case is not fixed. It occurs if you switch between edge and
server runtime several times without changing the content of the file:
Edge runtime
```js
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge',
}
export default () => new Response('Hello')
```
Change it to a server runtime
```js
export default function (req, res) {
res.send('Hello')
}
```
Change back to edge runtime, the content of the file is the same as the
first time we compiled the edge runtime version.
```js
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge',
}
export default () => new Response('Hello')
```
The reason is that both the edge and server compiler emits to the same
file (/.next/server/pages/api/hello.js) which makes this check fail in
webpack:
https://github.com/webpack/webpack/blob/main/lib/Compiler.js#L849-L861
Possible solution is to use different output folders for edge and server
https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1661163106667559
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Currently the DEV server can't recover if you export an invalid runtime
config. It ends up in a state where it stops to work but nothing is
printed to the terminal.
It now prints an error but keeps working. When building it should crash,
there's an existing test for that
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/test/production/exported-runtimes-value-validation/index.test.ts#L5-L17
#### Reproduce
```tsx
export default function Page() {
return <p>hello world</p>
}
export const config = {
runtime: 'something-odd',
}
```
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes#36251
