We found that `.swcrc` was unintentionally loaded breaking applications as it is not tested for that yet, customization will be added at a later point in time
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
* Fix `currentFeatures` to `concurrentFeatures`
Small typo fix in docs
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
When an compilation happens in the timespan between "page loaded client bundle" and "web socket got initial sync event" it didn't apply the hmr update.
This ensures we remove null bytes from the resolved path as it isn't valid when using `path`/`fs`. Additional tests have been added to ensure this is handled properly.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30298
In #29010, we started throwing an error if the res was mutated after
getServerSideProps() returned. This was to support classic streaming,
where it would be possible to accidentally mutate the response headers
after they were already sent. However, this change also caught [a few
non-streaming cases](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/29010#issuecomment-943482743) that we don't want to break.
As such, with this change, we only throw the error if res is mutated
after gSSP returns *and* you've opted into using classic streaming.
Otherwise, we will only add a warning to the console.
This change addresses some feedback that some users don't realize
that the `priority` attribute exists and is critical for managing
LCP when using the next/image component. It adds a dedicated
section to the Image Optimization doc that explains how and when
to use the attribute.
Fixes#29624
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
