Sebastian Silbermann
ed4d772359
Stop using baseUrl in root tsconfig ( #64117 )
2024-04-09 00:25:43 +02:00
Tim Neutkens
56d17c4e77
Skip browserslistrc tests ( #61294 )
...
## What?
Fixes the condition to correctly test if browserslist is applied in both
webpack and Turbopack.
Skips the test because `.browserslistrc` is not supported yet and will
be added after stable.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2277
2024-01-29 10:51:44 +01:00
Tim Neutkens
ac1e392cc7
Remove experimental.legacyBrowsers as it is stable ( #54718 )
...
This experimental option went to stable in Next.js 13, so this code was
leftover from then.
The reason `true` wasn't needed is that you can provide your own
`browserslistrc` that will allow targeting any browsers needed.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
2023-08-29 22:31:06 +02:00
Steven
cff9fc9d74
BREAKING CHANGE: Remove browsersListForSwc and change default to legacyBrowsers: false ( #41529 )
...
Remove `browsersListForSwc` since it is enabled by default now, and disable `legacyBrowsers` by default.
This PR also bumps the default browserslist to the following:
- Chrome 64+
- Edge 79+
- Firefox 67+
- Opera 51+
- Safari 12+
See related RFC:
- Closes #33227
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-19 01:38:39 +00:00
Tim Neutkens
fe3d6b7aed
Add support for browserslist and legacyBrowsers experimental option ( #36584 )
...
Implements the first part of #33227
- Applies browserslist to JS transforms when `experimental.browsersListForSwc` is enabled.
- You don't have to use browserslist, there's also `legacyBrowsers: false` which will be the new default in Next.js 13. See #33227 for which browsers and why. `legacyBrowsers` requires `browsersListForSwc: true` to function until it is the default.
```js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
legacyBrowsers: false,
browsersListForSwc: true,
}
}
```
I only implemented the JS part of the RFC, the CSS part should be handled in a follow-up PR.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-05-17 15:09:34 +00:00
