* Add initial config
* Comment out other action
* Update config
* Update config
* Update configs
* rename requires -> needs
* Update configs
* Update configs
* Enable headless mode
* Disable circleci while testing
* Disable build-test-deploy in circle
* Update build step
* Disable fail fast
* Update configs
* Add runs-on to publish steps
* bump
* Update config
* Update group count
* Update checkout path
* Update test all concurrency
* Handle EPIPE errors
* Revert "Handle EPIPE errors"
This reverts commit a993565bbdd77df136e07d54eb83ed32b18e5963.
* Update test to handle EPIPE in test
* Remove CircleCi config
* Revert "Update test to handle EPIPE in test"
This reverts commit c8cb72d5303b5fd165016f9eba6c8c888d8a1907.
* Update to use node 10 and see if EPIPE error is still present
* Revert "Revert "Update test to handle EPIPE in test""
This reverts commit efd2abe7c35c12bf78530064796d853c171efcf1.
* Revert "Update to use node 10 and see if EPIPE error is still present"
This reverts commit 893da4f31279228ebec6fa208c34ef179a6ebaf4.
* Add todo for node issue
* undo lint change as it should be correct
* Add dummy step to require
* Add runs-on for dummy job
* Run prettier over packages/**/*.js
* Run prettier over packages/**/*.ts
* Run prettier over examples
* Remove tslint
* Run prettier over examples
* Run prettier over all markdown files
* Run prettier over json files
I've noticed that you're still getting questions asked here despite the previous template being clear - today a user even expressed they thought the prompt meant: post a question on Spectrum then post a link to that question here.
This change makes the suggestion more explicit.
You could additionally add something like "Questions posted on Github will likely be closed" which I think it would cut down on the people ignoring the prompt. But you might feel that is too aggressive.
This adds triggering the PR Stats GitHub Action for a canary release. It compares the latest canary release with the last stable release and posts it as a comment to the commit.
