- Code splitting should be disabled for the server-web build. Done via `ServerlessPlugin`.
- ~Target can't be `web`, `webworker` is better.~ Using `web` and `es6` for now, still not ideal.
- https://github.com/acornjs/acorn/issues/970
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
resolve absolute URLs in CSS when using urlImports
remove `[path]` from static static image output path
replace file-loader with asset module, remove file-loader
This updates the `outputFileTracing` to fix a few cases we noticed where files weren't caught and also ensures we match webpack's `esm` resolving so that we don't include `cjs` files when webpack expects `esm`, it also updates to the latest `@vercel/nft` version which removes the caching in favor of ensuring the `reasons` map contains all parents allowing us to trace all entries in one `nodeFileTrace` run and the collect the separate files for each entry from the `reasons` map giving us much better performance/reliability.
This also ensures we don't include static image imports when enabled in the traces since they can drastically increase deployment size on larger projects.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/28227 to ensure `_app` and `_document` HMR correctly when you start the dev server and then add `_app` and `_document`.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/27888
when typechecking next.config.js as described [in the docs](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/docs/basic-features/typescript.md#type-checking-nextconfigjs), an error would be thrown if `future` and `experimental` are missing. When using `Partial<>` in the type definition instead, it works as expected.
Fixes#25498
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
add `experimental.esmExternals: boolean | 'loose'` config option
remove `output.environment` configuration in favor of `target`
| | `esmExternals: false` (default) | `esmExternals: 'loose'` | `esmExternals: true` |
| ------------------------ | ------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -------------------- |
| import cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
| require cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
| import mixed package | `require()` *** | `import()` | `import()` |
| require mixed package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
| import pure esm package | `import()` | `import()` | `import()` |
| require pure esm package | Error ** | `import()` * | Error ** |
| import pure cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | Resolving error |
| require pure cjs package | `require()` | `require()` | `require()` |
cjs package: Offers only CJS implementation (may not even have an `exports` field)
mixed package: Offers CJS and ESM implementation via `exports` field
pure esm package: Only offers an ESM implementation (may not even have an `exports` field)
pure cjs package: CommonJs package that prevents importing via `exports` field when `import` is used.
`*` This case will behave a bit unexpected for now, since `require` will return a Promise. So that need to be awaited. This will be fixed once the whole next.js bundle is ESM. It didn't work at all before this PR.
`**` This is a new Error when trying to require an esm package.
`***` For mixed packages we prefer the CommonJS variant to avoid a breaking change.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <timneutkens@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Solves an issue some users ran into where enabling webpack 5 highlighted a wrong JSON import where named exports were used for JSON data.
> Should not import the named export 'myValue' (imported as 'myValue') from default-exporting module (only default export is available soon)
This picks up on the inlining work in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/20598 to also include webpack loader inlining optimizations.
This includes:
* The dependencies of sass-loader
* resolve-url-loader
And for added benefit:
* babel-plugin-transform-define
* babel-plugin-transform-react-remove-prop-types
style-loader and css-loader didn't inline easily. Perhaps we can come back to these ones.
This pull request adds `future.strictPostcssConfiguration`, allowing users to opt-into the more strict PostCSS configuration loading.
This stricter PostCSS configuration loading ensures that CSS can be cached across builds.
This upgrades to ncc@0.25.0 and fixes the previous bugs including:
* ncc not referenced correctly in build
* Babel type errors
* node-fetch, etag, chalk and raw-body dependencies not building with ncc - these have been "un-ncc'd" for now. As they are relatively small dependencies, this doesn't seem too much of an issue and we can follow up in the tracking ncc issue at https://github.com/vercel/ncc/issues/612.
* `yarn dev` issues
Took a lot of bisecting, but the overall diff isn't too bad here in the end.
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/16973 which adds handling for the breaking change in the latest version of css-loader that causes unresolved file references in `url` or `import` to cause the build to fail. This fixes it by adding our own resolve checking and when it fails disabling the `css-loader`'s handling of it.
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/17701
We previously used to remove our FOUC helper inside of the style injection to ensure content was shown as fast as possible.
This behavior, however, was problematic for a few reasons:
1. Large JavaScript chunks would take longer than an animation frame to parse, causing FOUC
1. Rendering would sometimes complete before an animation frame, causing improper effects
To fix the latter, we started removing the no FOUC helper **before** rendering, however, we never fixed the former by removing the dead code.
There's not a great way to test this because the FOUC is so fast and flaky, however, this code really shouldn't exist and isn't likely to be re-added (regress).
Also, we already have FOUC tests that occasionally flake, probably due to this.
Fixes#12448Fixes#13058Fixes#11195Fixes#10404
