This is a #19325 reconfigured to support a loader passed in via a `loader` prop on the Image component, rather than using a config-based approach.
The idea is that applications wanting to use a custom loader will create a wrapper element for the image component that incorporates that loader. See a simple example of this pattern in the integration tests.
This solution is similar to the one prototyped by @ricokahler in #20213 and described at https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/18606#issuecomment-720149156
---
Closes#19325Fixes#18606
Currently pages with `notFound: false` from `getServerSideProps` behave the same as `notFound: true`, i.e. just having the key is enough to result in a 404. This fixes the check in render.tsx and adds tests for it.
Hi,
I'm submitting this PR for consideration as a new example app showing Styled JSX with SCSS working inside and outside storybook with example components.
Only known issue: I noticed that when running this example with:
`$ yarn next ./examples/with-storybook-styled-jsx-scss`
I receive the following error:
```
error - ./pages/_app.js
Error: [BABEL] .../next.js/examples/with-storybook-styled-jsx-scss/pages/_app.js: Cannot find module 'styled-jsx-plugin-sass' (While processing: ".../next.js/node_modules/next/babel.js")
```
However I notice that this same missing module error is triggered when running this existing example app "with-styled-jsx-scss".
Any changes/tweaks needed?
Thanks!
This pull request correctly assigns boolean attributes for `<script />` to match the element as it is created by a server-side render.
Prior to this pull request, we'd double-execute `<script>` tags with the `async`, `defer`, or `nomodule` property.
---
Fixes#9070
**What's the problem this PR addresses?**
`@next/mdx` adds the webpack loader `@mdx-js/loader` without resolving it to an absolute path
Depends on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/17606
**How did you fix it?**
`require.resolve` the webpack loader before adding it
This PR is a small follow-up to #14705. It saves Next.js users from falling into a [pretty nasty trap](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/36620) in which I ended up last Friday. It took more than two days to investigate what was going on, so I hope I'm the last person who’s doing it 😅
Next.js-specific MWE: https://github.com/kachkaev/hanging-response-in-next-via-redirect-plus-compression (needs to be ran locally using Node 14.0.0+).
> <img width="521" alt="Screenshot 2020-12-24 at 20 50 00" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/608862/103105989-a9b8dc00-4629-11eb-9be3-5108755604bf.png">
To reproduce the bug I’m fixing:
1. Pick a large http body size (64 or 128 KB)
1. Check _Call res.end() after res.redirect() in /api/redirect_
1. Navigate to a heavy page or an api handler via redirect
1. Observe that the http response is never finished.
If you set `compress` to `false` in `next.config.js` or pick a small payload size (< `zlib.Z_DEFAULT_CHUNK` after compression), the bug will not be observed. This is explained by the use of `res.on("drain", ...)` [by the `compression` package](3fea81d0ea/index.js (L193-L218)). The package itself is not the reason for an issue though, it seems to be in the Node’s built-in `http` package.
I’m happy to provide more info or GitHub CI to the MWE if needed. I was also thinking of adding some Next.js-specific testing, but could not come up with a compact and clear test plan. Happy to do this if there are any ideas.
cc @botv (author of #14705)
Updates the env documentation to mention `.vercelignore` when using the Vercel CLI. Also clears up parts of the other paragraphs and updates the links as these topics now have dedicated pages in the Vercel docs.
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/20628 this ensures `isReady` is not initially true when the query isn't present but the page is an automatically statically optimized dynamic route
