### What?
Adds a warning when `useSearchParams` deopts the entire page to
client-side rendering.
When there is no Suspense boundary the entire page becomes client-side
rendered, you can learn more about that here:
https://beta.nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/use-search-params#static-rendering
### Why?
We've seen a few cases where people accidentally deopt the entire page
by calling `useSearchParams` as there was no indicator that this deopt
happened.
### How?
When the full page deopt happens the error is caught by the rendering
code so we warn there.
Closes NEXT-589
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This adds updated matching handle for the server to separate out the matching and executing of different route types e.g. page routes, API routes, and app routes.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
After speaking with @timneutkens, this PR provides a smoother experience to users trying to migrate over to app without affecting users in pages.
This PR adds a new export available from `next/compat/router` that exposes a `useRouter()` hook that can be used in both `app/` and `pages/`. It differs from `next/router` in that it does not throw an error when the pages router is not mounted, and instead has a return type of `NextRouter | null`. This allows developers to convert components to support running in both `app/` and `pages/` as they are transitioning over to `app/`.
A component that before looked like this:
```tsx
import { useRouter } from 'next/router';
const MyComponent = () => {
const { isReady, query } = useRouter();
// ...
};
```
Will error when converted over to `next/compat/router`, as `null` cannot be destructured. Instead, developers will be able to take advantage of new hooks:
```tsx
import { useEffect } from 'react';
import { useRouter } from 'next/compat/router';
import { useSearchParams } from 'next/navigation';
const MyComponent = () => {
const router = useRouter() // may be null or a NextRouter instance
const searchParams = useSearchParams()
useEffect(() => {
if (router && !router.isReady) {
return
}
// In `app/`, searchParams will be ready immediately with the values, in
// `pages/` it will be available after the router is ready.
const search = searchParams.get('search')
// ...
}, [router, searchParams])
// ...
}
```
This component will now work in both `pages/` and `app/`. When the component is no longer used in `pages/`, you can remove the references to the compat router:
```tsx
import { useSearchParams } from 'next/navigation';
const MyComponent = () => {
const searchParams = useSearchParams()
// As this component is only used in `app/`, the compat router can be removed.
const search = searchParams.get('search')
// ...
}
```
Note that as of Next.js 13, calling `useRouter` from `next/router` will throw an error when not mounted. This now includes an error page that can be used to assist developers.
We hope to introduce a codemod that can convert instances of your `useRouter` from `next/router` to `next/compat/router` in the future.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds an error that was missing. Link to beta until the changes are live.
closes#41900
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adds build error when using font loaders with babel. Otherwise you'll
get other unrelated errors.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### 📖 What's in there?
Dynamic code evaluation (`eval()`, `new Function()`, ...) is not
supported on the edge runtime, hence why we fail the build when
detecting such statement in the middleware or `experimental-edge` routes
at build time.
However, there could be false positives, which static analysis and
tree-shaking can not exclude:
- `qs` through these dependencies (get-intrinsic:
[source](https://github.com/ljharb/get-intrinsic/blob/main/index.js#L12))
- `function-bind`
([source](https://github.com/Raynos/function-bind/blob/master/implementation.js#L42))
- `has`
([source](https://github.com/tarruda/has/blob/master/src/index.js#L5))
This PR leverages the existing `config` export to let user allow some of
their files.
it’s meant for allowing users to import 3rd party modules who embed
dynamic code evaluation, but do not use it (because or code paths), and
can't be tree-shaked.
By default, it’s keeping the existing behavior: warn in dev, fails to
build.
If users allow dynamic code, and that code is reached at runtime, their
app stills breaks.
### 🧪 How to test?
- (existing) integration tests for disallowing dynamic code evaluation:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-dynamic`
- (new) integration tests for allowing dynamic code evaluation: `pnpm
testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-configurable`
- (amended) production tests for validating the new configuration keys:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=config-validations`
To try it live, you could have an application such as:
```js
// lib/index.js
/* eslint-disable no-eval */
export function hasUnusedDynamic() {
if ((() => false)()) {
eval('100')
}
}
export function hasDynamic() {
eval('100')
}
// pages/index.jsx
export default function Page({ edgeRoute }) {
return <p>{edgeRoute}</p>
}
export const getServerSideProps = async (req) => {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:3000/api/route`)
const data = await res.json()
return { props: { edgeRoute: data.ok ? `Hi from the edge route` : '' } }
}
// pages/api/route.js
import { hasDynamic } from '../../lib'
export default async function handle() {
hasDynamic()
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge' ,
allowDynamic: '/lib/**'
}
```
Playing with `config.allowDynamic`, you should be able to:
- build the app even if it uses `eval()` (it will obviously fail at
runtime)
- build the app that _imports but does not use_ `eval()`
- run the app in dev, even if it uses `eval()` with no warning
### 🆙 Notes to reviewers
Before adding documentation and telemetry, I'd like to collect comments
on a couple of points:
- the overall design for this feature: is a list of globs useful and
easy enough?
- should the globs be relative to the application root (current
implementation) to to the edge route/middleware file?
- (especially to @sokra) is the implementation idiomatic enough? I've
leverage loaders to read the _entry point_ configuration once, then the
ModuleGraph to get it back during the parsing phase. I couldn't re-use
the existing `getExtractMetadata()` facility since it's happening late
after the parsing.
- there's a glitch with `import { ServerRuntime } from '../../types'` in
`get-page-static-info.ts`
([here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539/files#diff-cb7ac6392c3dd707c5edab159c3144ec114eafea92dad5d98f4eedfc612174d2L12)).
I had to use `next/types` because it was failing during lint. Any clue
why?
### ☑️ Checklist
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This serves to add support for [Subresource
Integrity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity)
hashes for scripts added from the new app directory. This also has
support for utilizing nonce values passed from request headers (expected
to be generated per request in middleware) in the bootstrapping scripts
via the `Content-Security-Policy` header as such:
```
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'nonce-2726c7f26c'
```
Which results in the inline scripts having a new `nonce` attribute hash
added. These features combined support for setting an aggressive Content
Security Policy on scripts loaded.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* fix internal type
* allow `void` to be returned from Middleware
* mark deprecated APIs in JSDoc
* fix typo
* add missing error page
* remove unused import
## Bug
- [x] Fixes#38047
- ~[ ] Integration tests added: do you want them added for such an unusual edge case?~ [Comment below: skipping](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38046#issuecomment-1207444526)
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`: ~I'll wait until this approach & error message are confirmed before thinking more deeply on how to explain the error~
Sending a draft PR as reference ahead of time. 🙂
Doesn't resolve the root issue of why `_devPagesManifest.json` might fail to load. But does improve the log for when it happens. I'd suggest applying this same fix to `_devMiddlewareManifest.json` too.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>Before</th>
<th>After</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Console</th>
<td>
<pre>
<code>
Failed to fetch devPagesManifest TypeError: Failed to fetch
at PageLoader.getPageList (page-loader.js?e87a:30:53)
at _callee$ (router.js?8684:955:45)
at ...
</code>
</pre>
<pre>
<code>
router.js?8684:1319 Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot \
read properties of undefined (reading 'includes')
at resolveDynamicRoute (router.js?8684:1319:16)
at _callee$
at ...
</code>
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre>
<code>
Failed to fetch devPagesManifest: TypeError: Failed to fetch
at PageLoader.getPageList (page-loader.js?e87a:30:53)
at _callee$ (router.js?8684:955:45)
at ...
</code>
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Visual</th>
<td><img alt="Screenshot of a Next.js runtime error: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'includes')" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3335181/175854728-8d5c2051-1229-4da7-8af1-fc95236befae.png" /></td>
<td><img alt="Screenshot of a Next.js runtime error: Error: Failed to fetch _devPagesManifest.json. Is something blocking that network request?" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3335181/175854774-07895846-1a1c-4bb8-bf57-fa696b8c6ba4.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
* Add next.config.js validation with ajv
* update manifest
* update lib type
* remove old tests
* update to pre-build validation code
* ensure validate output is ncced
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Add example of typing next.config.js
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
## What's in there?
The Edge runtime [does not support Node.js modules](https://edge-runtime.vercel.app/features/available-apis#unsupported-apis).
When building Next.js application, we currently fail the build when detecting node.js module imported from middleware.
This is an blocker for using code that is conditionally loading node.js modules (based on platform/env detection), as @cramforce reported.
This PR implements a new strategy where:
- we can build such middleware/Edge API route code **with a warning**
- we fail at run time, with graceful errors in dev (console & react-dev-overlay error)
- we fail at run time, with console errors in production
## How to test?
All cases are covered with integration tests.
To try them live, create a simple app with a page, a `middleware.js` file and a `pages/api/route.js`file.
Here are iconic examples:
### node.js modules
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
// static
import { basename } from 'path'
export default async function middleware() {
// dynamic
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
return NextResponse.next()
}
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
// static
import { isAbsolute } from 'path'
export default async function handle() {
// dynamic
const { isAbsolute } = await import('path')
return Response.json({ useNodeModule: isAbsolute('/test') })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired error (+ source code highlight in dev):
> The edge runtime does not support Node.js 'path' module
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
Desired warning at build time:
> A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 2) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] builds middleware successfully, shows build warning, shows desired error on stderr on call
- [x] builds route successfully, shows build warning, shows desired error on stderr on call
### 3rd party modules not found
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
// static
import Unknown from 'unknown'
export default async function middleware() {
// dynamic
const Unknown = await import('unknown')
new Unknown()
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
// static
import Unknown from 'unknown'
export default async function handle() {
// dynamic
const Unknown = await import('unknown')
return Response.json({ use3rdPartyModule: Unknown() })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired error (+ source code highlight in dev):
> Module not found: Can't resolve 'does-not-exist'
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/module-not-found
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] fails to build middleware, with desired error on stderr
- [x] fails to build route, with desired error on stderr
### unused node.js modules
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export default async function middleware() {
if (process.exit) {
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
}
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
export default async function handle() {
if (process.exit) {
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
}
return Response.json({ useNodeModule: false })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired warning at build time:
> A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 2) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
- [x] invoke middleware in dev with no error
- [x] invoke route in dev with no error
- [x] builds successfully, shows build warning, invoke middleware with no error
- [x] builds successfully, shows build warning, invoke api-route with no error
## Notes to reviewers
The strategy to implement this feature is to leverages webpack [externals](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/externals/#externals) and run a global `__unsupported_module()` function when using a node.js module from edge function's code.
For the record, I tried using [webpack resolve.fallback](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/resolve/#resolvefallback) and [Webpack.IgnorePlugin](https://webpack.js.org/plugins/ignore-plugin/) but they do not allow throwing proper errors at runtime that would contain the loaded module name for reporting.
`__unsupported_module()` is defined in `EdgeRuntime`, and returns a proxy that's throw on use (whether it's property access, function call, new operator... synchronous & promise-based styles).
However there's an issue with error reporting: webpack does not includes the import lines in the generated sourcemaps, preventing from displaying useful errors.
I extended our middleware-plugin to supplement the sourcemaps (when analyzing edge function code, it saves which module is imported from which file, together with line/column/source)
The react-dev-overlay was adapted to look for this additional information when the caught error relates to modules, instead of looking at sourcemaps.
I removed the previous mechanism (built by @nkzawa ) which caught webpack errors at built time to change the displayed error message (files `next/build/index.js`, `next/build/utils.ts` and `wellknown-errors-plugin`)
In Middlewares, dynamic code execution is not allowed. Currently, we warn if eval / new Function are invoked in dev but don't warn another dynamic code execution in WebAssembly.
This PR adds warnings for `WebAssembly.compile` and `WebAssembly.instantiate` with a buffer parameter (note that `WebAssembly.instantiate` with a **module** parameter is legit) invocations. Note that other methods that compile WASM dynamically such as `WebAssembly.compileStreaming` are not exposed to users so we don't need to cover them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR builds on the work from @hattakdev (PR went stale: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/14499) and adds a new `integration` test for the new warning.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## To run locally
1. `pnpm build`
2. `pnpm testonly test/integration/export-getInitialProps-warn/test/index.test.js`
Fixes#13946
## Notes
<details>
<summary>Click to toggle see</summary>
I know the `contributing.md` doc said to avoid adding new tests to `integration`. It also said new tests should be written in TypeScript.
I wasn't sure where to put the tests for this so I went with `integration`. I also didn't see many other tests written in TS in this part of the codebase so I stuck with `.js`.
</details>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR moves the internal logic associated with `req.ua` into an explicit method the user should to call to have the same behavior.
**before**
```typescript
// middleware.ts
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const url = request.nextUrl
const viewport = request.ua.device.type === 'mobile' ? 'mobile' : 'desktop'
url.searchParams.set('viewport', viewport)
return NextResponse.rewrites(url)
}
```
**after**
```typescript
// middleware.ts
import { NextRequest, NextResponse, userAgent } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
const url = request.nextUrl
const { device } = userAgent(request)
const viewport = device.type === 'mobile' ? 'mobile' : 'desktop'
url.searchParams.set('viewport', viewport)
return NextResponse.rewrites(url)
}
```
This potentially will save the extra 17 kB related to the size of `ua-parser-js`
_Hello Next.js team! First PR here, I hope I've followed the right practices._
### What's in there?
It has been decided to only support the following uses cases in Next.js' middleware:
- rewrite the URL (`x-middleware-rewrite` response header)
- redirect to another URL (`Location` response header)
- pass on to the next piece in the request pipeline (`x-middleware-next` response header)
1. during development, a warning on console tells developers when they are returning a response (either with `Response` or `NextResponse`).
2. at build time, this warning becomes an error.
3. at run time, returning a response body will trigger a 500 HTTP error with a JSON payload containing the detailed error.
All returned/thrown errors contain a link to the documentation.
This is a breaking feature compared to the _beta_ middleware implementation, and also removes `NextResponse.json()` which makes no sense any more.
### How to try it?
- runtime behavior: `HEADLESS=true yarn jest test/integration/middleware/core`
- build behavior : `yarn jest test/integration/middleware/build-errors`
- development behavior: `HEADLESS=true yarn jest test/development/middleware-warnings`
### Notes to reviewers
The limitation happens in next's web adapter. ~The initial implementation was to check `response.body` existence, but it turns out [`Response.redirect()`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/server/web/spec-compliant/response.ts#L42-L53) may set the response body (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31886). Hence why the proposed implementation specifically looks at response headers.~
`Response.redirect()` and `NextResponse.redirect()` do not need to include the final location in their body: it is handled by next server https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/server/next-server.ts#L1142
Because this is a breaking change, I had to adjust several tests cases, previously returning JSON/stream/text bodies. When relevant, these middlewares are returning data using response headers.
About DevEx: relying on AST analysis to detect forbidden use cases is not as good as running the code.
Such cases are easy to detect:
```js
new Response('a text value')
new Response(JSON.stringify({ /* whatever */ })
```
But these are false-positive cases:
```js
function returnNull() { return null }
new Response(returnNull())
function doesNothing() {}
new Response(doesNothing())
```
However, I see no good reasons to let users ship middleware such as the one above, hence why the build will fail, even if _technically speaking_, they are not setting the response body.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR deprecates declaring a middleware under `pages` in favour of the project root naming it after `middleware` instead of `_middleware`. This is in the context of having a simpler execution model for middleware and also ships some refactor work. There is a ton of a code to be simplified after this deprecation but I think it is best to do it progressively.
With this PR, when in development, we will **fail** whenever we find a nested middleware but we do **not** include it in the compiler so if the project is using it, it will no longer work. For production we will **fail** too so it will not be possible to build and deploy a deprecated middleware. The error points to a page that should also be reviewed as part of **documentation**.
Aside from the deprecation, this migrates all middleware tests to work with a single middleware. It also splits tests into multiple folders to make them easier to isolate and work with. Finally it ships some small code refactor and simplifications.
* remove the experimental web vital hook api
* remove the exported flush effects api and only error on development, keep only usage to styled-jsx
for web vital hook API: The usage is not widly adopted since the existing exported vital api could do the same work. In the future we'll deprecate the `_app.server` in favor of `_app` in server component pages. so that this api won't be required.
for flush effects api: other css-in-js libs are not using the same approach like styled-jsx which holding a style registry and could flush it during streaming. emotion-js and styled-components are still relying on `Document.getInitialProps` atm and we have supported it in latest canary
Changes to the beforeInteractive strategy to make it work for streaming
Splitting `beforeInteractive` into two strategies `beforeInteractive` at the _document level and `beforePageRender` for page level <Scripts>
* Add warning when importing "next" directly
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* add example
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Update next/link error when no children are provided
* update manifest
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Adds an API config option that disables warning a user when their API response body is over 4 megs. This has been added for users who'd like to stream larger amounts of data from their API acknowledging the drawbacks. This config mirrors the existing [`externalResolver` config](https://nextjs.org/docs/api-routes/api-middlewares#custom-config).
Closes: [#33162](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33162)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Implements https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30997 with some minor tweaks to the design:
* The hook is moved to Client Components (e.g. `pages/_app` instead of `pages/_document`). This was a silly oversight in the original design: the hook needs to be called during server prerendering.
* `useFlushEffects` instead of `useFlushEffect` as there isn't a particularly safe way to implement the singular semantics as a Client Component hook given the current implementation of server rendering.
---
Fixes#30997
Ref: [Slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1645003443213449)
When opening a new issue, it is desired that the user has checked if the `canary` release not already have fixed their issue, since we do not backport fixes to previous Next.js versions.
- added a CLI warning when `next info` runs that looks like this:
This links to a message docs page with more information and some useful links.
- refactored our bug report templates to be more clear and removed the fields that are now unnecessary (since running `next info` is expected to run on releases that already have it)
- Made browser/deployment optional, as in most cases those fields are irrelevant. We still ask them, but mention that they are only needed if relevant.
- Asking for the exact browser version now
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Mark some previously experimental swc compiler options as stable under a new `compiler` option
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This commit adds a development mode warning in the console
if you try to include <link rel="stylesheet"> tags in
next/head, e.g.
```
<Head>
<link ref="stylesheet" href="..." />
</Head>
```
The warning message explains that this pattern will not
work well with Suspense/streaming and recommends using a
custom Document component instead.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds a development mode warning in the console
if you try to include <script> tags in next/head, e.g.
```
<Head>
<script async src="..." />
</Head>
```
The warning message explains that this pattern will not
work well with Suspense/streaming and recommends using the
next/script component instead.
TODO in follow-up PR: add same warning for stylesheets, etc
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
