### What?
Refactors the resolving logic for the `app` loader tree. This PR ensures
it's used to create entrypoints in turbopack. Next up is integrating it
into the webpack build too.
These changes also ensure that parallel routes resolving is applied,
which previously wasn't supported in turbopack.
### Why?
Part of the effort to deduplicate critical logic between
turbopack/webpack in Next.js, this will help land features in
turbopack/webpack at the same time.
### How?
Quite a few changes. @sokra helped a ton on this PR. `app_structure.rs`
was changed to the new resolving logic so most of the logic is there.
Additionally we added support for calling the same function in two ways
from Node.js: `turbo.entrypoints.get` and `turbo.entrypoints.getStream`.
`get` can be used by `next build` to get the full list of
entrypoints/loadertrees once. `getStream` has watching built-in and
calls a callback function with the new list anytime a file is added that
would change the loadertree.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This is second attempt to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38076 . Most of changes are identical to previous PR. Main difference is introducing features `native-tls` and `rustls` for the sentry's downstream feature. Few platform targets we build (mostly where we cross compiles) fails to find native openssl for the specified target. For those, we falls back to rustls instead. The only exception is aarch64_windows, neither openssl nor rustls can be compiled straightforwardly, For those platform we bail out and do not init sentry at all. There are nearly 0 users on aarch64_windows anyway. We could try to located target's openssl binary, but the effort required seems not worth enough.
Also PR changed `server_name` property to not to include real device hostname to avoid possible PII concerns.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR attempts to setup native crash reporter for `next-swc`. Currently, it uses sentry internally, but it is subject to change depending on the usecase & needs. In any case it won't be breaking changes since this is not transparent to the end users.
PR sets up basic, minimal setup to collect crash reports only at the moment. We may want to expand & collect more data in native next-swc, but it is not clear what we need to collect / and I believe most cases next.js's js context can collect those data via existing telemetry. Crash report is an exception native handler can perform much better by having it in native context directly. While this is sent to different endpoint than telemetry, it is considered as same opt-in configuration. If telemetry is disabled, crash reporter won't collect as well.
The information collected by the reporter is minimally configured by sentry's sdk. These are the informations collected for example:
- device arch / family / model
- os kernel version / name / version
- runtime (rust) version / channel
- sentry sdk
- panic backtrace
- next.js release version
- device host name
There's no per-system uuid configurations yet.
It may need some audit if we need to omit some data included in above, while most of them seems ok to me.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR straightly port over swc's target triple metadata (https://github.com/swc-project/swc/pull/4058) into next-swc, mainly for the tracking purpose of usages.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
