<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
This PR changes to the `root` of the cargo workspace to the root of repo
itself, allows next-swc and other rust codebase can use repo root as
workspace root.
### Why?
Currently cargo manifest for the next-swc is not placed under the root
of the repo, which makes invocation to the tool requires to change cwd /
or set cwd. Similarly needs to open editor to the root of the cargo
manifest separately to able to utilize language server kicks in. Moving
manifest to the root consolidates those, so can invoke either cli / or
editor to the same root of the repo.
We decided in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/48308 that we won't
use `turbo` when packing packages for tests.
This PR removes all code associated with that effort. The whole thing
fas behind a flag, so it shouldn't affect anything.
fix NEXT-1025
### What?
* move some shared runtime logic to turbopack
* use relative imports from internal code when possible
* move react-refresh logic to turbopack
* move benchmark code logic to turobpack
see https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/4553
### Why?
We want to have benchmarking again for turbopack PRs
We want to have a standalone turbopack cli (eventually)
We want to avoid duplicating the runtime code
### How?
refactoring, moving code
### What?
enables the benchmark tests from turbopack again
### Why?
It tests common scenarios like HMR
fixes WEB-792
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Kirszenberg <alex.kirszenberg@vercel.com>
### What?
Syncing https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels with the bug report template.
### Why?
We've got some OS-related reports so it would be nice to be able to filter on that.
### How?
The label description is added as a select option to the template, which then matches one of the labels https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
- closes WEB-766.
This PR enables a new job for running tests, against turbopack. Since we
have observed some flakiness across turbopack test execution, it starts
from absolute minimum set of tests to not block any CI due to unexpected
failure.
Ran manual workflow roughly ~50 times and looks like these set of tests
are fine to make it as blocking check for the PR. In the future, depends
on the stability we'll increase number of test gradually.
### What?
Turbopack tests need to run on any change
### Why?
Next.js changes might break turbopack and we want to avoid that.
### How?
Change CI job
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This re-enables running the CNA tests for all non-docs changes as it's now ensuring we don't regress on turbopack or our default templates.
Also fixes the main repo's package.json files from being modified during tests.
This ensures we only honor cache entries from the in memory cache for up
to 2 seconds so that revalidates can correctly propagate and also
increases max fetch cache entry size to 2 MB. The `fetchCache` export is
also being detected in this PR but not yet honored which will be done in
a follow-up.
As discussed this adds a publish workflow that can be triggered for
canary or stable releases which ensures we are publishing from a
consistent environment and local config doesn't affect a release.
This ensures the build spinner is correctly stopped in a TTY environment
and also adds regression tests for `app` and `pages` to ensure this
behaves as expected.
This updates our docker image to use the `jammy` tag instead of `focal`
to match the Ubuntu version to our CI.
- Move span wrapping rendering closer to the user code and don't add
span when we have cache-hit
- Add `getStaticProps` span
- Add spans around API handlers (pages and app)
- Add `generateMetadata` span
- Clarify naming that we use `page` for entrypoints like
`/path/[param]/page` or `/path/[param]/layout`. And `route` for
`/path/[param]`
fix NEXT-857 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-857))
### What?
A fork of https://github.com/github/issue-labeler that we pull in and
maintain.
### Why?
The official issue labeler had some issues which I tried to fix in PRs
and eventually got merged upstream, but the release cycle was a bit
slow, and that GitHub action had many parts we did not really need
anyway. So it makes sense to maintain it ourselves.
### How?
This PR removes the
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/.github/issue-labeler.yml
config file, which in our case is just a sublist of
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels anyway. Instead, we can pull in
the labels from GitHub directly and filter out those that we want to
apply to issues. This will keep things more in sync.
fix NEXT-750 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-750))
---------
### What?
update prettier in the PR stats action
### Why?
It's outdated and can't parse syntax of the latest swc version (static
blocks)
### How?
update package.json
### What?
enables the next-dev-tests crate integration tests from trubopack
### Why?
to unblock the move PR we temporarily disabled the tests
### How?
Fix the new location and fix the expect dependency
Fixes WEB-708
---------
Co-authored-by: Justin Ridgewell <justin@ridgewell.name>
Hi everyone! Thank you for your work on this awesome framework 🙌
This short PR will add a short description on how to install the `canary` version of `next` to the `bug issue template`. It's only affecting this issue template and nothing else.
Closes#47080
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
Update workspace cargo deps
Update cargo deps to point to local workspace
Ignore too-many-arguments warnings
Fix clippy errors
Update pnpm workspaces
exclude integration tests from unit tests CI
rust-analyzer settings
add rust flags and env vars
