The `target: serverless` config was deprecated a year ago starting in
[Next.js 12](https://nextjs.org/blog/next-12).
Tests were disabled in #41252 so we can now remove `target: serverless`
and all usage of `target` in `next.config.js`.
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
- Enable newNextLinkBehavior. See #36436
- Run next/link codemod on test suite
Note that from when this lands on apps trying canary will need to run
the new-link codemod in order to upgrade.
Ideally we have to detect `<a>` while rendering the new link and warn
for it.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This pull request **temporarily** removes ESLint, as it was not landed in accordance with our standard experimental policies. We are fully committed to landing this change again.
This is being reverted because:
- Next.js has very strict goals for its install size. This feature resulted in adding over 17MB, or a 43.6% increase.
- The feature was not first landed under the `experimental` key in `next.config.js`, rather, it was added under the stable namespace (top-level)
- Using the feature doesn't do a "guided setup" like TypeScript, it should ask you to "bring your own" dependencies for ESLint
- It uses a undesirable ESLint plugin name: `plugin:@next/next/recommended`. This should read out as strictly `next`, or as short as we can get it.
- Does not provide actionable warnings (missing link to resolve issue)
- Does not follow appropriate console output styling. We need to revisit how these are presented.
To re-land this, we need to ensure the following minimums are met:
- Very minor change in install size
- Fully experimental (i.e. flagged) with warnings
- Finalized package name and configuration shape, preferably so we can do ` { extends: 'next' } `.
For #22228
This PR:
- Adds ESLint to toolchain
- Included by default for builds (`next build`)
- Can be enabled for development (`next dev`)
- Custom formatter built for output
- Adds appropriate tests
- Adds two documentation pages
Disambiguate between pages/index.js and pages/index/index.js so that they resolve differently.
It all started with a bug in pagesmanifest that propagated throughout the codebase. After fixing pagesmanifest I was able to remove a few hacks here and there and more logic is shared now. especially the logic that resolves an entrypoint back into a route path. To sum up what happened:
- `getRouteFromEntrypoint` is the inverse operation of `getPageFile` that's under `pages/_document.tsx`
- `denormalizePagePath` is the inverse operation of `normalizePagePath`.
Everything is refactored in terms of these operations, that makes their behavior uniform and easier to update/patch in a central place. Before there were subtle differences between those that made `index/index.js` hard to handle.
Some potential follow up on this PR:
- [`hot-reloader`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/13699/files#diff-6161346d2c5f4b7abc87059d8768c44bR207) still has one place that does very similar behavior to `getRouteFromEntrypoint`. It can probably be rewritten in terms of `getRouteFromEntrypoint`.
- There are a few places where `denormalizePagePath(normalizePagePath(...))` is happening. This is a sign that `normalizePagePath` is doing some validation that is independent of its rewriting logic. That should probably be factored out in its own function. after that I should probably investigate whether `normalizePagePath` is even still needed at all.
- a lot of code is doing `.replace(/\\/g, '')`. If wanted, that could be replaced with `normalizePathSep`.
- It looks to me like some logic that's spread across the project can be centralized in 4 functions
- `getRouteFromEntrypoint` (part of this PR)
- its inverse `getEntrypointFromRoute` (already exists in `_document.tsx` as `getPageFile`)
- `getRouteFromPageFile`
- its inverse `getPageFileFromRoute` (already exists as `findPageFile ` in `server/lib/find-page-file.ts`)
It could be beneficial to structure the code to keep these fuctionalities close together and name them similarly.
- revise `index.amp` handling in pagesmanifest. I left it alone in this PR to keep it scoped, but it may be broken wrt nested index files as well. It might even make sense to reshape the pagesmanifest altogether to handle html/json/amp/... better
