Moves font related types to `next/font` so they can be reused in font
loaders.
Adds an argument to font loaders, the relative path from the app root to
the module consuming the loader. Needed for resolving local files
relative to the module calling it. Also used to improve error message.
Adds `@next/font/local` font loader. Similar to `@next/font/google` but
used to host locally downloaded font files.
The issue seems to be that ` await check(() =>
browser.elementByCss('p').text(), 'hello world!!!')` sometimes tries to
get `.text()` from the DOM before the full reload and it times out.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes#40463
Could use some help figuring out where to add a test! I looked around
and found
[`jest-next-swc.test.ts`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/test/unit/jest-next-swc.test.ts),
but I don't think I can use that to test this fix. Anyways, from my
local testing this PR seems to fix the issue.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
For some context:
[https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509)
Continuation of #40221 and #40227
Adds `experimental.fontLoaders`.
SWC next-font-loaders (#40221) transforms font loader (e.g. #40227) call
expressions into an import with the function call arguments as a query.
The imports will be matched by `next-font-loader`. It runs the
configured font loaders - emits font files and returns CSS. Exports are
added, and the font-family is made locally scoped. The returned CSS is
turned into a CSS module with `css-loader` which lets you consume the
font-family.
`FontLoaderManifestPlugin` creates a manifest of the preloaded font
files for each entrypoint. Preload/preconnect are then added in
`_document.tsx` if any font files were found for that path.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
For app edge SSR, we don't need any internal pages for it since it's
handled by app-renderer. This results around reducing 20KB from app edge
SSR
# Changes
* Strip those internal pages modules when it's in app edge SSR
* Minimize edge SSR chunk to see the tree-shake result
* Add bundle analyzer with switcher in stats-app for testing. Using
`TEST_ANAYLYSE=1` to build stats-app for testing
For some context:
https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509
Adds `@next/font` package.
`scripts/update-google-fonts.js` generates functions and metadata for
all available google fonts. The metadata is used in `loader.ts` to
validate font options (from #40221). It then fetches the CSS from google
fonts, downloads the font files and emits them as static assets.
The actual integration with `packages/next` and integration tests
depends on #40221, will follow up with new PR.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
`config.experimental.serverComponents` is currently required to be
enabled or disabled together with `config.experimental.appDir` (which
means `serverComponents === appDir` otherwise it will throw) so there is
no reason to keep both of them. This PR removes `serverComponents` from
Next.js and only rely on `appDir` instead.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR changes the external module resolution to eagerly bundle
node_modules, and some specific Next.js internal modules, if on the
`WEBPACK_LAYERS.server` layer. While resolving corresponding packages,
we use the `react-server` export condition (fallbacks to default).
A follow-up PR will be adding a Next.js option to opt-out specific
packages from being bundled on the server layer.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
I have next-swc compiled locally inside the folder so there're a lot of files there (totally unexpected). And then the `fs.copy` takes 28433 ms... by filtering it out it's only 1s.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Problem
Currently the Next.js infer utility (`InferGetServerSidePropsType` and
`InferGetStaticPropsType`) types can lead to a wrong inferred types
(`never`). This happens if these functions return something different
than: `{props: {}}`.
**Example:** `getServerSideProps`
```typescript
export async function getServerSideProps({ query }: GetServerSidePropsContext) {
if (query.foo) {
return {
notFound: true,
}
}
return {
props: {
foo: "bar"
},
}
}
type PageProps = InferGetServerSidePropsType<typeof getServerSideProps>
// => type PageProps = never
```
**Example:** `getStaticProps`
```typescript
import type { InferGetStaticPropsType, GetStaticPropsContext } from 'next'
export async function getStaticProps(context: GetStaticPropsContext) {
if (context.params?.bar) {
return {
notFound: true,
}
}
return {
props: {
foo: 'bar',
},
}
}
type PageProps = InferGetStaticPropsType<typeof getStaticProps>
// => type PageProps = never
```
This is because the first infer condition of the utility type is not
satified leading to a never result.
```typescript
export type InferGetServerSidePropsType<T> = T extends GetServerSideProps<
infer P, // <- NOT SATISFIED
any
>
? P
: T extends (
context?: GetServerSidePropsContext<any>
) => Promise<GetServerSidePropsResult<infer P>>
? P
: never // <- NOT SATISFIED
```
## Solution
I have experimented with different solutions ending with a much simpler
type, that is faster to execute, easier to read and universally usable
for both prop variations.
```typescript
/**
* Flow:
* - Make sure getStaticProps is a function
* - Get its return type
* - Extract the one that contains {props: any}
* - Return the props
*/
export type InferGetStaticPropsType<T extends (args: any) => any> = Extract<
Awaited<ReturnType<T>>,
{ props: any }
>['props']
```
## Bug
- [x] Related issues: fixes#36615, #15913,
https://twitter.com/leeerob/status/1563540593003106306
- [x] Type tests added
## Future thoughts
Since `InferGetStaticPropsType` and `InferGetServerSidePropsType` are
now the same, it's api could be merged into one utility type (e.g:
InferNextProps). I recommend doing this in a different PR.
## Additional info
I have tested this approach using the following [external
package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/infer-next-props-type)
(@timneutkens sorry for the late PR). Since about 12 Month I haven't
received any negative feedback (issues) regarding this approach.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
If there's any resolve alias in webpack config, an aliased resource url will error with `require.resolve` usage in flight manifest plugin, we need to resolve the absolute resource url first then pass down to flight manifest
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Currently, `link[rel=preload]` inserted by `priority` will not have the `crossOrigin` attribute, which will cause the preloaded response not to be used, since the CORS policy mismatches. The PR fixes that.
We used to do an extra pass of SWR `parse` and loop over the AST inside
JavaScript to check if `getServerSideProps` or `getStaticProps` is used
in a client page or layout. Instead this can be done in the same
`react_server_components` SWC transform now.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Sends web vitals to Vercel analytics.
My plan for the test was to assert the data sent by the client but there's a bug where it's always null when sending a blob https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/6479.
When adding support for a custom web vitals reporter it will be easier to assert the values sent by the reporter.
Ensures Flight responses are not loaded as HTML.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Follow up for https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40415
Remove internal next client api determination, fully relying on `'client'` directive.
Change `.client.js` extension to `.js ` in tests, remove legacy / unused test files
## Feature
Change server components convention from using `.server.js` / `.client.js` file extension to determine it's a server or client component to using `'client'` js literal as a directive for determine client components boundary.
React RFC: https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/189
New behavior doesn't consume `.server.js` as server components any more, if you're enabling `serverComponents` flag, every `page.js` in app dir will become server components by default. If you adding a `'client'` directive to the page, then that page will become a client component. This rule also applies to the normal js components, client components will require a `'client'` directive to indicate its identity, instead of having a `.client.js` extension.
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
This is an initial implementation of the Server Components SWC
transformer. For the server graph, it detects client entries via the
`"client"` directive and transpile them into module reference code; for
the client graph, it removes the directives. And for both graphs, it
checks if there is any invalid imports for the given environment and
shows proper errors.
With that added, we can switch from `next-flight-client-loader` to
directly use the SWC loader in one pass. Next step is to get rid of the
`.client.` extension in other plugins.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Continues #39778Closes#40499
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Closes#40571
An earlier fix in #24481 did not consider the `/` case. The page path normalization method `normalizePagePath` turned `/` into `/index` and the route matching was skipped for the index route's non-existent HTML file.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
<!--
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
- [ ] -->
## Feature
- [x] Implements https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/40112
- [x] Integration tests added
Adds a new option to the current font optimization to enable
experimental font size adjust
The new `optimizeFonts` config will be
```
optimizeFonts: {
inlineFonts: true,
experimentalAdjustFallbacks: false,
},
```
To enable the feature, set `experimentalAdjustFallbacks: true`
`optimizeFonts: false` will disable the entire feature (including
inlining google font definition)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
If in `resolve.fallback` we set previously polyfilled modules to `false`
instead of an empty object, webpack will pass the compilation _and_ not
include any polyfills.
Fixes#40522, fixes#40364
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #40562`
fixes#40562
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- fixes
- #38528
- #40432
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Hi, it is my first pull request in this project.
So... if you need anything more tasks, please tell me.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This masks flight parameters from middleware so it doesn't interfere with RSC or routing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
Ref: #40002#40026#40191Fixes#40025
This is the final step of fixing #40025. The PR migrates the rest of the
`next/script` test cases to run in both dev (strict mode) and
production, confirming that the `next/script` component is now
completely concurrent rendering resilient and is ready for the upcoming
React 18 `<OffScreen />`.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Another step toward fixing #40025.
Multiple `next/script` components with the same `src` may exist in the
Next.js app. So the `loadScript` function will always attach the
`onLoad` handler to the `loadingPromise` every time it executes.
However, with strict mode (or wrapped inside the `<OffScreen />`
component), the `useEffect` could execute more than once for the same
`next/script` component, thus the `loadScript` for each `next/script`
component could execute more than once (and `onLoad` to be attached more
than once), results in `onLoad` fires more than once.
The PR makes sure that for every `next/script` component mounted, the
`loadScript` will always be executed only once for each of them.
The corresponding `onload fires correctly` integration test case is also
updated to run in dev mode.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Adds some of the tests we didn't have yet for app.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Such bots typically navigate websites using hard navigations (as they
crawl one URL at a time). Respectively, they do not benefit from
prefetches at all, while increasing the cost of both the crawl and
operating the site.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539 as discussed
this renames to `unstable_` prefix initially while we test this out
further.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
### 📖 What's in there?
Dynamic code evaluation (`eval()`, `new Function()`, ...) is not
supported on the edge runtime, hence why we fail the build when
detecting such statement in the middleware or `experimental-edge` routes
at build time.
However, there could be false positives, which static analysis and
tree-shaking can not exclude:
- `qs` through these dependencies (get-intrinsic:
[source](https://github.com/ljharb/get-intrinsic/blob/main/index.js#L12))
- `function-bind`
([source](https://github.com/Raynos/function-bind/blob/master/implementation.js#L42))
- `has`
([source](https://github.com/tarruda/has/blob/master/src/index.js#L5))
This PR leverages the existing `config` export to let user allow some of
their files.
it’s meant for allowing users to import 3rd party modules who embed
dynamic code evaluation, but do not use it (because or code paths), and
can't be tree-shaked.
By default, it’s keeping the existing behavior: warn in dev, fails to
build.
If users allow dynamic code, and that code is reached at runtime, their
app stills breaks.
### 🧪 How to test?
- (existing) integration tests for disallowing dynamic code evaluation:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-dynamic`
- (new) integration tests for allowing dynamic code evaluation: `pnpm
testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-configurable`
- (amended) production tests for validating the new configuration keys:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=config-validations`
To try it live, you could have an application such as:
```js
// lib/index.js
/* eslint-disable no-eval */
export function hasUnusedDynamic() {
if ((() => false)()) {
eval('100')
}
}
export function hasDynamic() {
eval('100')
}
// pages/index.jsx
export default function Page({ edgeRoute }) {
return <p>{edgeRoute}</p>
}
export const getServerSideProps = async (req) => {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:3000/api/route`)
const data = await res.json()
return { props: { edgeRoute: data.ok ? `Hi from the edge route` : '' } }
}
// pages/api/route.js
import { hasDynamic } from '../../lib'
export default async function handle() {
hasDynamic()
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge' ,
allowDynamic: '/lib/**'
}
```
Playing with `config.allowDynamic`, you should be able to:
- build the app even if it uses `eval()` (it will obviously fail at
runtime)
- build the app that _imports but does not use_ `eval()`
- run the app in dev, even if it uses `eval()` with no warning
### 🆙 Notes to reviewers
Before adding documentation and telemetry, I'd like to collect comments
on a couple of points:
- the overall design for this feature: is a list of globs useful and
easy enough?
- should the globs be relative to the application root (current
implementation) to to the edge route/middleware file?
- (especially to @sokra) is the implementation idiomatic enough? I've
leverage loaders to read the _entry point_ configuration once, then the
ModuleGraph to get it back during the parsing phase. I couldn't re-use
the existing `getExtractMetadata()` facility since it's happening late
after the parsing.
- there's a glitch with `import { ServerRuntime } from '../../types'` in
`get-page-static-info.ts`
([here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539/files#diff-cb7ac6392c3dd707c5edab159c3144ec114eafea92dad5d98f4eedfc612174d2L12)).
I had to use `next/types` because it was failing during lint. Any clue
why?
### ☑️ Checklist
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Found that the cause was that `React.useId()` returns the same value across requests whereas it was being used to create a unique key. On further inspection that code could be removed altogether as `id` was not used client-side and the `rscCache` map is no longer needed as the flight instance is already being created per request so it can live in the context of the request execution.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
An alternative solution to #40371
Ref: #38867, https://github.com/t3-oss/create-t3-app/issues/412,
https://github.com/t3-oss/create-t3-app/pull/414
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Added missing trace for `client-full-reload` event in hot reloader. Full
reload tests moved to hmr, think they make more sense there than on
their own.
The PR fixes#40388.
Currently, `next/dynamic` will try to provide a default `loading` to the
`loadableOptions` even when `suspense` is enabled, thus triggering the
incorrect warning. The PR fixes that. The corresponding integration test
case is also updated.
cc @huozhi
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: huozhi <inbox@huozhi.im>
