<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Consider the following middleware which redirects to
`/path/to#fragment`.
```ts
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server';
export async function middleware(request) {
const url = new URL('/path/to#fragment', request.url);
return NextResponse.redirect(url);
}
```
However, it actually redirects to `/path/to`, namely it discards the
fragment part in the destination URL `#fragment`. This is because
`NextURL.toString()` does not append that part. This PR fixes the bug.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This masks flight parameters from middleware so it doesn't interfere with RSC or routing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
Follow-up to the earlier enabling of classes/variables etc.
Bug
Related issues linked using fixes #number
Integration tests added
Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md
Feature
Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
Related issues linked using fixes #number
Integration tests added
Documentation added
Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md
Documentation / Examples
Make sure the linting passes by running pnpm lint
The examples guidelines are followed from our contributing doc
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This PR fixes an issue where we have a middleware that rewrites every single request to the same origin while having `i18n` configured. It would be something like:
```typescript
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(req) {
return NextResponse.rewrite(req.nextUrl)
}
```
In this case we are going to be adding always the `locale` at the beginning of the destination since it is a rewrite. This causes static assets to not match and the whole application to break. I believe this is a potential footgun so in this PR we are addressing the issue by removing the locale from pathname for those cases where we check against the filesystem (e.g. public folder).
To achieve this change, this PR introduces some preparation changes and then a refactor of the logic in the server router. After this refactor we are going to be relying on properties that can be defined in the `Route` to decide wether or not we should remove the `basePath`, `locale`, etc instead of checking which _type_ of route it is that we are matching.
Overall this simplifies quite a lot the server router. The way we are testing the mentioned issue is by adding a default rewrite in the rewrite tests middleware.
* Do not exclude internal _next request in middleware
* Allow for `NextURL` to parse prefetch requests
* Add test for middleware data prefetch
* Refactor `hasBasePath` and `replaceBasePath`
* Refactor `removeTrailingSlash`
* Refactor parsed next url to use `getNextPathnameInfo`
* Allow to configure `NextURL`
* Ensure middleware rewrites with always with a locale
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Moves two utility functions from `server/router.ts` into their own file. This avoids the middleware pulling in the full Next.js router into its bundle.
There are probably more opportunities like this, but this is a good start. Middleware should likely be bundled by a non-chunking optimizing compiler.
We currently have inconsistencies when working with URLs in the Edge Functions runtime, this PR addresses them introducing a warning for inconsistent usage that will break in the future. Here is the reasoning.
### The Browser
When we are in a browser environment there is a fixed location stored at `globalThis.location`. Then, if one tries to build a request with a relative URL it will work using that location global hostname as _base_ to construct its URL. For example:
```typescript
// https://nextjs.org
new Request('/test').url; // https://nextjs.org/test
Response.redirect('/test').headers.get('Location'); // https://nextjs.org/test
```
However, if we attempt to run the same code from `about:blank` it would not work because the global to use as a base `String(globalThis.location)` is not a valid URL. Therefore a call to `Response.redirect('/test')` or `new Response('/test')` would fail.
### Edge Functions Runtime
In Next.js Edge Functions runtime the situation is slightly different from a browser. Say that we have a root middleware (`pages/_middleware`) that gets invoked for every page. In the middleware file we expose the handler function and also define a global variable that we mutate on every request:
```typescript
// pages/_middleware
let count = 0;
export function middleware(req: NextRequest) {
console.log(req.url);
count += 1;
}
```
Currently we cache the module scope in the runtime so subsequent invocations would hold the same globals and the module would not be evaluated again. This would make the counter to increment for each request that the middleware handles. It is for this reason that we **can't have a global location** that changes across different invocations. Each invocation of the same function uses the same global which also holds primitives like `URL` or `Request` so changing an hypothetical `globalThis.location` per request would affect concurrent requests being handled.
Then, it is not possible to use relative URLs in the same way the browser does because we don't have a global to rely on to use its host to compose a URL from a relative path.
### Why it works today
We are **not** validating what is provided to, for example, `NextResponse.rewrite()` nor `NextResponse.redirect()`. We simply create a `Response` instance that adds the corresponding header for the rewrite or the redirect. Then it is **the consumer** the one that composes the final destination based on the request. Theoretically you can pass any value and it would fail on redirect but won't validate the input.
Of course this is inconsistent because it doesn't make sense that `NextResponse.rewrite('/test')` works but `fetch(new NextRequest('/test'))` does not. Also we should validate what is provided. Finally, we want to be consistent with the way a browser behaves so `new Request('/test')` _should_ not work if there is no global location which we lack.
### What this PR does
We will have to deprecate the usage of relative URLs in the previously mentioned scenarios. In preparation for it, this PR adds a validation function in those places where it will break in the future, printing a warning with a link that points to a Next.js page with an explanation of the issue and ways to fix it.
Although middleware changes are not covered by semver, we will roll this for some time to make people aware that this change is coming. Then after a reasonable period of time we can remove the warning and make the code fail when using relative URLs in the previously exposed scenarios.
**Note**: This PR is applying again changes landed #31935 that were reverted from an investigation.
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Since `localhost` is actually an alias for `127.0.0.1` that points to loopback, we should take that into consideration at `NextURL` when we handle local URLs.
The implementation is based on [is-localhost-url](https://github.com/Kikobeats/is-localhost-url); I added some tests over local URLs variations present at the library to ensure other variations are working fine.
Additionally, I refactor some things over the code to avoid doing the same twice and added some legibility that is always welcome when you are working with URLs stuff.
closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31533
This fixes our `basePath` detection/replacing server-side as we were incorrectly considering `/docss` a match for a `basePath` of `/docs` which caused us to have an unexpected value in the `normalizeLocalePath` function.
- Fixes#22429
- Regression introduced in #17757
- Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31423
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds support for [Middleware as per RFC ](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/29750).
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
