Related to #31506, this PR adds `getPrerenderManifest` and `getRoutesManifest` methods to provide manifest files to the base server. In the future, we can consider making these methods async, or provide necessary manifests from the very top.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Part of #31506, this PR removes `loadEnvConfig` and `chalk` from the base server while keeping the same behavior for the node server.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Part of #31506, this PR moves the code of middleware handling from the base server to the node server.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Adds base http classes, along with Node + Web (partial) implementations
Removes usage of IncomingMessage and ServerResponse from base server
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
## Feature
Resolves#30996
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This PR moves `require` and `fs` usage from the base server to the node server. Closes#32322.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Production middlewares will only expose env vars that are statically analyzable, as mentioned here: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/server#how-do-i-access-environment-variables
This creates some incompatibility with `next dev` and `next start`, where all `process.env` data is shared and can lead to unexpected behavior in runtime.
This PR fixes it by limiting the data in `process.env` with the inferred env vars from the code usage. I believe the test speaks for itself 🕺
<!--
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
-->
* JSON.stringify generic errors
* Add util for normalizing errors
* lint-fix
* Add better error for null case as well
Co-authored-by: Michael Ozeryansky <mozeryansky@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
The redirect responses do not contain a message body. This is in conflict with the RFCs (below) and causes Traefik (a reverse proxy) to invalidate the responses. In this pull request, I add a response body to the redirect responses.
This PR is similar to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/25257, it appears that there are some other locations where redirection is handled incorrectly in next.js.
# References
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.3
> All 1xx (Informational), 204 (No Content), and 304 (Not Modified) responses must not include a message-body. All other responses do include a message-body, although the body may be of zero length.
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231#section-6.4.3
> The server's response payload usually contains a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the different URI(s).
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
**Note**: This PR is applying again changes landed #31935 that were reverted from an investigation.
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Same as #32105 (closed due to conflicts):
> Explained in #32066, rename next-server as base-server and extend NextNodeServer on top of it.
>
> Note that this is just an initial PR so no method is ported.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
