### What?
Bump up turbopack which includes url rewrite related improvements. This makes `test/integration/url` test passes.
Note there are some lacking behavior around edge runtime + url behavior, it is being tracked in PACK-2014.
Closes PACK-2051
This updates the rust toolchain to 2023-11-16 and:
- Removes now-unnecessary `#![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]`
- Applies auto-fixable lint fixes
- Uses `Cargo.toml` new `lint` section instead of command line rustc flags
Test Plan: Tested with updated turbo in a create-next-app
Closes PACK-1979
Co-authored-by: OJ Kwon <1210596+kwonoj@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
When navigating between pages (via `prefetch: false`) within a dynamic
segment, the shared layout is re-rendered. This can cause unexpected
behavior like layout data changing when navigating between child
segments.
### Why?
When prefetch is false, we're currently opting into an "optimistic
navigation" codepath, which will optimistically render layout-routers up
to the point where data is missing, while kicking off data fetches. It
attempts to determine where refetching needs to happen by traversing the
router cache nodes and checking where data is missing. However, it
locates these cache nodes by using "segments" obtained by
[deconstructing the
URL](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/fix/optimistic-bailout/packages/next/src/client/components/router-reducer/reducers/navigate-reducer.ts#L142),
which won't accurately contain dynamic segment data. For ex, `/en` which
corresponds with `/app/[lang]/page.tsx` will have a cache node key of
`lang|en|d`, not `en`. Similarly, the optimistic tree that gets
constructed will also be incorrect, since it uses the URL segment.
### How?
My initial fix was to match the dynamic segment against the segment
constructed by the URL. But after discussion with @sebmarkbage and the
team, it seems more correct to remove the optimistic case all together
as there's no guarantee that the url will actually match to that
segment.
Fixes#50670
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Requires vercel/turbo#6388
This uses the structure implemented in vercel/turbo#6388 to support formatted text when reporting. Right now only the `Line` and basic `String` cases are handled.
### What
Corrects how urlassetreference reads its assets path to allow to resolve image assets correctly.
There is a test failure in the integration/url still, that involves probably larger refactoring so making this PR first to enable baseline, ensure further refactoring does not breaks anything.
This auto-generated PR updates the integration test manifest used when testing Turbopack.
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <1365881+sokra@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
Wraps up metadata-dynamic-routes tests fixes for the turbopack. There is 1 remaining failing test due to lacks of supporting `import.meta.url` which need to be addressed separately.
I spent amount of time why turbopack cannot find the route for the dynamic metadata for a certain route. In the end, found there are mismatching expectations for the route due to different hash for the certain route. We do use the same djb2 hash between next.js and turbopack both, so it was quite confusing why we don't get deterministic hash.
After trying some experiments, found out root cause was how 2 different runtimes handle overflow for given type of numbers. In rust + turbpack we use u32 and do 32-bit hash calculation for given string, while in js we implicitly used number type as is, in result overflow occurs with default 53-bit float.
Originally I tried to adjust hash in turbopack side to preserve js hash as-is, but so far I found it was non trivial to do so as rust there's no out of the box types we can coerce to the js number type. In result, unlike other fixes in turbopack this PR changes how js hash is being generated. I hope this woulndn't be a breaking changes; expect so since this is a metadata specific hash that we do not have written spec for it.
Closes WEB-1890
### What?
Adds support for Server Actions imported by both server and client.
### Why?
If an Action is imported by both the Client and RSC layers, we need to
support them as if they're the same action.
### How?
First, we need to ensure both layers create the same action hash ids,
which we can then use to deduplicate actions imported by both layers. If
a conflict is found, we prefer the RSC layer's action.
Closes WEB-1879
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### Why?
breaks hmr and causes some duplicate react instances (it was also
supposed to fix some of those, seems neither version is correct)
Closes WEB-1882
### What?
Changes Server Actions to use a lazy `require()` statement instead of a
lazy dynamic `import()`, to fix SA in the Edge runtime.
### Why?
The Edge runtime has a restriction that it's not allowed to lazy load
more files. The problem is that dynamic `import()` does exactly that, it
defers importing those files until the call time. `require()` doesn't
have this issue, because the chunks it would load are included instead
of deferred.
### How?
Just needed to modify the actions loader entry point… after hours of
trying to get the action loader to evaluate in the node runtime and then
import the actions in the edge runtime.
Closes WEB-1874
### What?
We have to walk the directory tree recursively for every page (instead
of once) to get the correct loaderTree.
With this PR we walk the directory tree and for every
`page.(js,jsx,ts,tsx)` (entrypoint) we find we walk it again to get the
loader tree for that page
Closes WEB-1868
Closes WEB-1609
### What
Fixes how to determine if given route is dynamic to match next-dev does:
462b8585b6/packages/next/src/lib/metadata/get-metadata-route.ts (L79)
We were passing calculated route instead to check if it's dynamic, so
`/sitemap` always considered as static since calculated route is
`/sitemap.xml`.
Closes WEB-1864
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What
Enabling test from https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/57300. There may be some other test cases passing by fix, but this is the known direct offending test can be enabled.
Closes WEB-1847
### What
minor fix to match behavior to ae10b5c82b/packages/next/src/shared/lib/router/utils/remove-trailing-slash.ts (L2C4-L9)
as we're seeing a panic when route is /
```
Panic: PanicInfo { payload: Any { .. }, message: Some(byte index 1 is out of bounds of ``), location: Location { file: "packages/next-swc/crates/next-core/src/next_edge/route_regex.rs", line: 202, col: 59 }, can_unwind: true, force_no_backtrace: false }
Backtrace: 0: backtrace::backtrace::libunwind::trace
```
Closes WEB-1841
Remove the experimental `serverActions` flag
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
instead of include known passing tests
also updates the update test manifest
### Why?
Newly added test cases should always pass turbopack (or at least you would need to manually opt-out of it.
### How?
Uses a exclude list of tests instead of an allow list
Closes WEB-1752
### What?
Deduplicates our env var injection between the JS and rust side
Closes WEB-937
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
### What?
clear require cache only when there has been changes
Before we cleared the require.cache after every ensurePage call. This is
too much. The new approach compares the hashes of all emitted files with
the previous hashes and only clears require.cache when they differ.
### Why?
reloading a page and client navigation is slow due the re-requiring
server files
Closes WEB-1686
### What?
A follow up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/55975, this will
list every flakey test in the turbopack suite so that we can run the
remaining passing tests.
### Why?
More tests is more better.
### How?
Trial and error. Gonna let CI tell me what's flakey with a few runs.
Closes WEB-1651
Noticed a couple of directories had unit tests in `dist` which are being
run and reported during the Turbopack runs. These are generally quite
small so I'm not expecting this to have much effect on the package size
or CI runs, just making sure the data is correct.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
Updates `run-test.js` to allow running individual test cases inside a test file.
### Why?
So that we can dramatically increase Turbopack's test coverage. Turbopack has implemented most (but not all) necessary features from the webpack bundles. But a single failing test case would prevent us from running any case inside a test file. With case filtering, we're able to run the cases we know will pass and prevent regressions on those.
### How?
Case filtering is only exposed via the `NEXT_EXTERNAL_TESTS_FILTERS` ENV, which points to a JSON file containing a map of test files with the test cases inside those files that are known to pass.
The known-passing test cases can be updated after Turbopack's daily integration test run by running `test/build-turbopack-tests-manifest.js`, which will update the `test/turbopack-tests-manifest.json` manifest.
Closes WEB-1640
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <1365881+sokra@users.noreply.github.com>
