Tim Neutkens
a961ec0d5f
Skip production tests for Turbopack ( #56045 )
...
As Turbopack is only focusing on dev currently.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
2023-09-26 22:30:04 +02:00
Zack Tanner
dbac7552eb
fix resolve routes behavior when matching a dynamic segment ( #54539 )
...
When `fallback: false` is set and you visit a dynamic segment (e.g. `/[slug]`), the router server was getting stuck in a `x-no-fallback` loop and eventually would fail because it was matching the output at `check_fs` before attempting to resolve dynamic routes in the `check: true` block.
Closes NEXT-1557
2023-08-25 02:14:09 +00:00
JJ Kasper
a92a5caec2
Update test set-up to leverage playwright when able to ( #28634 )
...
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-09-13 14:36:25 +02:00
JJ Kasper
7d77a19af2
Fix fallback: false triggering 404 before rewrites ( #24121 )
...
This fixes dynamic pages with `fallback: false` that don't have a matching path causing a 404 before rewrites are checked unexpectedly. This ensures we treat `fallback: false` pages as a match only if they also have a matching static path so that fallback rewrites can be triggered correctly. An additional test suite as been added to ensure this is working as expected.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
2021-04-16 15:07:24 +00:00
