<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
#42502 added `next/compat` but it's top level export folder wasn't
published to nextjs
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Removing the `hasReactRoot` condition and `__NEXT_REACT_ROOT` env var since next 13 requires latest react 18 to be installed, all the react 17 (non concurrent mode) compatible code can be dropped now.
We found a case where 14.0.0 breaking with private class methods, such
as:
```js
class C {
#x() { return 42; }
x() {
return this.#x();
}
}
```
This feature was introduced in Node.js 14.6.0, so we can bump the
minimum version.
See https://node.green
Checking if app dir exported components (page/layout/etc.) are valid components in dev mode, also update `react-is` to detect module reference properly
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Next.js 13 will require React 18.
In this PR I've only updated the peerDependency and removed the test runs in GH actions. Further cleanup will follow later, this allows us to remove the code supporting it later.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
For css-in-js libs like styled-jsx we don't recommend to use on server side since it will blow up the rsc payload during navigation. This upgration of styled-jsx includes `client-only` as dependency so that it will throw when it's been used on serevr layer
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/styled-jsx/pull/816
Inline a react and react-dom for app dir, when `appDir` flag is enabled
opt into the built-in version for all.
For server layer react, use the react share subset for server
components.
For all server side of react-dom usage, use the server-rendering-stub.
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR introduces breaking changes by renaming components.
- Rename `next/image` to `next/legacy/image`
- Rename `next/future/image` to `next/image`
The diff is very confusing because both components are very similar so git got confused.
