Temporarily we need to ensure that `<link>` tags are injected to `<head>` in the stream.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Add next.config.js validation with ajv
* update manifest
* update lib type
* remove old tests
* update to pre-build validation code
* ensure validate output is ncced
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Add example of typing next.config.js
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Went through the todos I had added while implementing the new router and removes everything that is now covered.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Ensures you can use server context when navigating.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Ensures you get a clearer error when createServerContext is missing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Both `Buffer` and `node-html-parser` are not necessary to be introduced to the Edge SSR bundle. This makes the bundle size 25% smaller.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* inject the link tags before page content in layout router
* fix flight handling during client navigation
* fix buffering
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Renames todos to split them / make it easier to find what has to be done for the new router.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Improve CSS modules support in server components.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Hi guys! First all, thanks for provide a way to use some custom external cache resource for ISR feature. _(done here: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37258 and https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37326)_
I managed to get it working by creating my custom external cache resource _(using redis)_ that implements the new `CacheHandler`. _(overriding my own `get` and `set` methods and using the FileSystemCache as fallback as well)_
I'm planning to release some kind of plugin to encapsulate and parse the client's `next.config.js` and bring an initial support for redis using this new Next.js feature.
So, I really don't know if this was intentional, but I noticed that the new `incrementalCacheHandlerPath` prop wasn't passed to the `IncrementalCache` instance in `base-server`.
This PR just connects the wires for this feature, and also provide the default value (`undefined`) to the relative experimental prop config. _(to avoid the warnings as shown below)_
<img width="858" alt="Screen Shot 2022-07-07 at 19 37 46" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4661217/177882897-831ade73-26ba-493a-b0cf-3de62cfd708f.png">
* Enable css in server components
* inject server css into flight
* refactor and fix test
* fix lint
* resolve css from module deps
* fix dev & prod inconsistentce, collect client css
* simplify
* dedupe duplicated css chunks
* remove ssr link injection and css flight
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Ensures catchall parameters are passed as an array to `params` instead of as a string.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Follow-up of #38439.
Found a small issue with booting `next start` that is now resolved.
Also added optional catchall routes support.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Adds support for `[...slug]` dynamic segments.
I found there's an inconsistency in query/params providing and added a quick fix for it now. Will update the handling in a follow-up PR to ensure it's consistently providing dynamic params outside of `query`.
Follow-up of #37551 and #38415.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This outputs a separate manifest for leveraging during deploy to handle the new app outputs. Also ensures dynamic routes from `app` our output in the `routes-manifest` correctly along with fixing the `react-dom` import.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37551
- Remove cache value that was incorrectly nested deeper
- Remove extra useEffect (already applied during hydration based on the `useReducer` input)
- Add dynamic parameter name into the tree
Follow-up to #37551, cleans up some code and prepares for catch-all and optional catch-all routes.
## Client-side router for `app` directory
This PR implements the new router that leverages React 18 concurrent features like Suspense and startTransition.
It also integrates with React Server Components and builds on top of it to allow server-centric routing that only renders the part of the page that has to change.
It's one of the pieces of the implementation of https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc.
## Details
I'm going to document the differences with the current router here (will be reworked for the upgrade guide)
### Client-side cache
In the current router we have an in-memory cache for getStaticProps data so that if you prefetch and then navigate to a route that has been prefetched it'll be near-instant. For getServerSideProps the behavior is different, any navigation to a page with getServerSideProps fetches the data again.
In the new model the cache is a fundamental piece, it's more granular than at the page level and is set up to ensure consistency across concurrent renders. It can also be invalidated at any level.
#### Push/Replace (also applies to next/link)
The new router still has a `router.push` / `router.replace` method.
There are a few differences in how it works though:
- It only takes `href` as an argument, historically you had to provide `href` (the page path) and `as` (the actual url path) to do dynamic routing. In later versions of Next.js this is no longer required and in the majority of cases `as` was no longer needed. In the new router there's no way to reason about `href` vs `as` because there is no notion of "pages" in the browser.
- Both methods now use `startTransition`, you can wrap these in your own `startTransition` to get `isPending`
- The push/replace support concurrent rendering. When a render is bailed by clicking a different link to navigate to a completely different page that still works and doesn't cause race conditions.
- Support for optimistic loading states when navigating
##### Hard/Soft push/replace
Because of the client-side cache being reworked this now allows us to cover two cases: hard push and soft push.
The main difference between the two is if the cache is reused while navigating. The default for `next/link` is a `hard` push which means that the part of the cache affected by the navigation will be invalidated, e.g. if you already navigated to `/dashboard` and you `router.push('/dashboard')` again it'll get the latest version. This is similar to the existing `getServerSideProps` handling.
In case of a soft push (API to be defined but for testing added `router.softPush('/')`) it'll reuse the existing cache and not invalidate parts that are already filled in. In practice this means it's more like the `getStaticProps` client-side navigation because it does not fetch on navigation except if a part of the page is missing.
#### Back/Forward navigation
Back and Forward navigation ([popstate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/popstate_event)) are always handled as a soft navigation, meaning that the cache is reused, this ensures back/forward navigation is near-instant when it's in the client-side cache. This will also allow back/forward navigation to be a high priority update instead of a transition as it is based on user interaction. Note: in this PR it still uses `startTransition` as there's no way to handle the high priority update suspending which happens in case of missing data in the cache. We're working with the React team on a solution for this particular case.
### Layouts
Note: this section assumes you've read [The layouts RFC](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) and [React Server Components RFC](https://reactjs.org/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react-server-components.html)
React Server Components rendering leverages the Flight streaming mechanism in React 18, this allows sending a serializable representation of the rendered React tree on the server to the browser, the client-side React can use this serialized representation to render components client-side without the JavaScript being sent to the browser. This is one of the building blocks of Server Components. This allows a bunch of interesting features but for now I'll keep it to how it affects layouts.
When you have a `app/dashboard/layout.js` and `app/dashboard/page.js` the page will render as children of the layout, when you add another page like `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` that page falls under the dashboard layout as well. When client-side navigating the new router automatically figures out if the page you're navigating to can be a smaller render than the whole page, in this case `app/dashboard/page.js` and `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` share the `app/dashboard/layout.js` so instead of rendering the whole page we render below the layout component, this means the layout itself does not get re-rendered, the layout's `getServerSideProps` would not be called, and the Flight response would only hold the result of `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js`, effectively giving you the smallest patch for the UI.
---
Note: the commits in this PR were mostly work in progress to ensure it wasn't lost along the way. The implementation was reworked a bunch of times to where it is now.
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## What's in there?
The Edge runtime [does not support Node.js modules](https://edge-runtime.vercel.app/features/available-apis#unsupported-apis).
When building Next.js application, we currently fail the build when detecting node.js module imported from middleware.
This is an blocker for using code that is conditionally loading node.js modules (based on platform/env detection), as @cramforce reported.
This PR implements a new strategy where:
- we can build such middleware/Edge API route code **with a warning**
- we fail at run time, with graceful errors in dev (console & react-dev-overlay error)
- we fail at run time, with console errors in production
## How to test?
All cases are covered with integration tests.
To try them live, create a simple app with a page, a `middleware.js` file and a `pages/api/route.js`file.
Here are iconic examples:
### node.js modules
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
// static
import { basename } from 'path'
export default async function middleware() {
// dynamic
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
return NextResponse.next()
}
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
// static
import { isAbsolute } from 'path'
export default async function handle() {
// dynamic
const { isAbsolute } = await import('path')
return Response.json({ useNodeModule: isAbsolute('/test') })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired error (+ source code highlight in dev):
> The edge runtime does not support Node.js 'path' module
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
Desired warning at build time:
> A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 2) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] builds middleware successfully, shows build warning, shows desired error on stderr on call
- [x] builds route successfully, shows build warning, shows desired error on stderr on call
### 3rd party modules not found
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
// static
import Unknown from 'unknown'
export default async function middleware() {
// dynamic
const Unknown = await import('unknown')
new Unknown()
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
export const config = { matcher: '/' }
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
// static
import Unknown from 'unknown'
export default async function handle() {
// dynamic
const Unknown = await import('unknown')
return Response.json({ use3rdPartyModule: Unknown() })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired error (+ source code highlight in dev):
> Module not found: Can't resolve 'does-not-exist'
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/module-not-found
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on stderr
- [x] in dev middleware, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, static, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev middleware, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] in dev route, dynamic, shows desired error on react error overlay
- [x] fails to build middleware, with desired error on stderr
- [x] fails to build route, with desired error on stderr
### unused node.js modules
```js
// middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export default async function middleware() {
if (process.exit) {
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
}
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
```js
// pags/api/route.js
export default async function handle() {
if (process.exit) {
const { basename } = await import('path')
basename()
}
return Response.json({ useNodeModule: false })
}
export const config = { runtime: 'experimental-edge' }
```
Desired warning at build time:
> A Node.js module is loaded ('path' at line 2) which is not supported in the Edge Runtime.
Learn More: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/node-module-in-edge-runtime
- [x] invoke middleware in dev with no error
- [x] invoke route in dev with no error
- [x] builds successfully, shows build warning, invoke middleware with no error
- [x] builds successfully, shows build warning, invoke api-route with no error
## Notes to reviewers
The strategy to implement this feature is to leverages webpack [externals](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/externals/#externals) and run a global `__unsupported_module()` function when using a node.js module from edge function's code.
For the record, I tried using [webpack resolve.fallback](https://webpack.js.org/configuration/resolve/#resolvefallback) and [Webpack.IgnorePlugin](https://webpack.js.org/plugins/ignore-plugin/) but they do not allow throwing proper errors at runtime that would contain the loaded module name for reporting.
`__unsupported_module()` is defined in `EdgeRuntime`, and returns a proxy that's throw on use (whether it's property access, function call, new operator... synchronous & promise-based styles).
However there's an issue with error reporting: webpack does not includes the import lines in the generated sourcemaps, preventing from displaying useful errors.
I extended our middleware-plugin to supplement the sourcemaps (when analyzing edge function code, it saves which module is imported from which file, together with line/column/source)
The react-dev-overlay was adapted to look for this additional information when the caught error relates to modules, instead of looking at sourcemaps.
I removed the previous mechanism (built by @nkzawa ) which caught webpack errors at built time to change the displayed error message (files `next/build/index.js`, `next/build/utils.ts` and `wellknown-errors-plugin`)
since we no longer have a single compiler for browser & edge, we can enable
source map generation by default for all edge functions. This would make it
much easier to debug and understand what's happening when deploying to prod
as the log statements will show us the actual code location instead of post
bundling and minified location.
This also removes the experimental flag as it's not needed anymore.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR corrects a mistake where a negative number could pass, as a number greater than 0.
This is due to negative numbers being a truthy value in JS.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Right now if people will accidentally export a typo like `runtime: 'experimental-egde'` we will fail silently.
This commit ensures we will throw and fail loudly when such typos occur.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Continue the work in #38310, this PR includes CSS files as chunks in the manifest for each client component, and then make sure the flight client loads the CSS files correctly.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This ensures we create any nested folders necessary when setting initial ISR cache entries with the filesystem cache. Also adds a regression test for this.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/38130
Currently `renderToReadableStream` will be called whenever the component is re-rendered, but the result should actually be cached (per request).
Thanks to @sebmarkbage for pointing out.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Minor fix to recent experimental configs. While the latest next.js includes support for those experimental features, currently it emits warnings like
```
You have defined experimental feature (swcPlugins) in next.config.js that does not exist in this version of Next.js
```
As validation checks the existence of default values even though config itself allows them to be optional. PR does not attempt to change validation logics, only amends it by having empty default values.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
avoid fetching a chunk for api endpoints on middleware redirect.
This still makes a request to the data endpoint, not sure if this is a good idea,
but a rewrite _can_ happen from that data request.
## Related
- Fixes#37944
- Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/37783
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
this makes all `experimental.images` options optional, so they can be toggled individually.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
