Update workspace cargo deps
Update cargo deps to point to local workspace
Ignore too-many-arguments warnings
Fix clippy errors
Update pnpm workspaces
exclude integration tests from unit tests CI
rust-analyzer settings
add rust flags and env vars
## What?
This PR has its main goal to improve the experience of opening/reviewing
a PR.
It improves the PR template, as well as extends PR auto-labeling.
## Why?
There are 2 parts to the PR template:
- Individual contributors: The current template accommodates for the
most common cases individual contributors use to contribute. (I.e.
fixing bugs, updating/adding examples, addressing documentation issues).
The new template keeps this at the top.
- Next.js team: As maintainers, we should try to explain PRs as if
someone with less context would review them. This should also help with
backreferencing PRs in issues and follow-up PRs and make it easier to
follow changes, understand trade-offs better at the time, and help new
team members catch up over time, etc.
## How?
The template is written in a comment instead of Markdown, so when the PR
is opened, most of the template is hidden to make it less verbose.
The checkboxes we've had before are not shown, but we already auto-label
PRs based on the path of the files that have been touched, so the
checkboxes showed redundant information.
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1677677802109289),
Closes NEXT-741
## What?
- Rendering `next info` output as code in the bug template
- Removed the "Feature Request" issue template, in favor of a more
granular discussion template
- Added a minimal template for Help discussions
## Why?
The main part of this PR is the new Feature Request template.
Anyone can propose a change to Next.js. However adding new features
often requires community discussions - whether to align expectations,
understand the consequences (eg.: backward compatibility/lifetime of a
feature), to look at and understand historical reasons for the current
behavior or lack of the feature -, which [GitHub
discussions](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions) is more
suited for than issues.
## How?
- Utilizing the new discussion templates
https://docs.github.com/en/discussions/managing-discussions-for-your-community/creating-discussion-category-forms
- Adding a link to the [new
issue](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/new/choose) view to make
it easier to discover
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1670874727319809)
Closes NEXT-742
---------
We want to make sure that our examples are not breaking.
We don't want to be slowed down by broken 3rd party packages, but we
need to ensure that examples covering next.js features are always green.
Added as a standalone workflow that doesn't parallelize. It will just
run on a cron schedule, so we can check for current status. We can add
Slack ping later if we need to.
The workflow tests just that our examples can build, so mostly TS
issues. We could definitely follow up with actual tests, but that is not
as low-hanging.
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
This PR updates the Edge Runtime docs on the next.js docs site with
simplified tables for each API section
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This updates our CI testing flow to only run against LTS Node.js version
on PRs and then run against the maintenance Node.js version when cutting
a release. This will allow speeding up PR test runs to get feedback
faster and remove un-necessary duplicate testing as it's very rare a
change breaks the maintenance Node.js version but not the LTS version.
This PR ensures the tests for codemods will automatically run in CI when the source code changes.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Not all systems have `/bin/bash` (for example NixOS).
`/usr/bin/env bash` reads the location of bash from `PATH`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- reverted to github version because that works now
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- [x] Depends on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45776
Turbotrace occupies too many memories while running; this PR makes it
run after the webpack build is finished, it can reduce the memory
hogging by webpack and turbotrace, thus avoiding OOM
The `maxFiles` option in turbotrace is removed because there is
`memoryLimit` option takes over its role.
Close WEB-556
Noticed while testing across CI environments that the `test-pack` handling is not-concurrent or cache safe so this removes it from being used by default and moves it behind a flag to allow further investigating later.
In CI if `test-pack` is called at the same time due to multiple concurrency it can cause the resulted archive to be corrupted so may require a form of lock to resolve in CI although locally re-using the same archive name/path isn't safe with pnpm as it won't bust the store cache and continue to leverage previous cache.
