<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
Partially resolves WEB-544.
This PR adds a new detection to the external env variable
`NEXT_TEST_CONTINUE_ON_ERROR`. If those variable is set, even if a suite
of test fails test runner will keep executing remaining tests.
Turbopack (vercel/turbo) runs Next.js integration tests to track its
feature parity to the existing Next.js features and currently it is
expected to fail on certain test: however, we still want to execute all
of the tests to track how many tests are passing / fails.
Once this change lands turbopack need further verification to see if all
of tests are actually running.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Warn users when there's `head.js` being used in `app/`, and recommend to
use metadata. Will show a warning in console while rendering
Closes NEXT-268
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
[Cypress](https://www.cypress.io/) recently went GA with a Component Testing offering which supports Next.js. This PR adds a brief section on what and how to use Cypress for component-level testing and updates the example project with a component test.
Any feedback on content or the example is welcome, thanks for considering!
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
First of all thanks for this amazing project and all the help you
provide with these examples.
It seems there is code duplication in this example. After some tests
locally seem to _document.js is not necessary for `gtag` to work
properly.
9d97a1e34a/examples/with-google-analytics/pages/_app.js (L30-L34)9d97a1e34a/examples/with-google-analytics/pages/_document.js (L13-L17)
I am aware of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40645 and I would
like to ask @dave-hay, @SukkaW and @ijjk to consider this is still
necessary. If so why then not move all content of the scripts from _app
to _document?
In any case, I am open to adding here some comments explaining what is
the reason for this code duplication if necessary.
<hr/>
Changes that come from https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/43897
1. The `event` hashChangeComplete should be removed since `/home` and
`/home/#section` is not new pageview, but just reference to the same
page.
If we go from /home to /home/#section (with a button click or a link for
example) this shouldn't trigger a new page visit on `gtag`.
For this reason, I think we should revert the changes from
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/36079. If there is a better
argument of why this should stay I am also open to creating comments to
clarify this on the example since I don't think should be the default
behavior and not useful in most cases.
2. The `id="gtag-init"` was added with no context to the example from
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/29530
If there is a reason for this id in the script to existing I am open to
adding a comment that clarifies this since in my experience is not
necessary at all.
Edit: Batching with https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/43897 as
recommended by
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/43897#issuecomment-1344635000
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This adds a new section about local overrides, as I ran into this error and it took me ages to figure out what was going wrong
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#44424 by adding the `app` folder to an `ESLINT_DEFAULT_DIRS`
constant which defines all folders where the linter should go through.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fix up a icon convention in #45612, we should pick up the
`apple-icon.<ext>` as this is a shorter path for users to remember.
Also addessing some feedbacks from @shuding in #45612
---------
This PR add supports for a shortcut for adding `icons.icon` or
`icons.apple` metadata for page or layout with static files.
Closes NEXT-263
Closes NEXT-260
If you specific icon.png or apple-touch-icon.png, they will be
automatically picked by and added into metadata as `icon` and
`apple-touch-icon` fields, and replace the `icons` field specified in
page/layout level metadata exports.
File matching rule:
```
icon -> /^icon\d?\.(ico|jpg|png|svg)$/
apple-touch-icon -> /^apple-touch-icon\d?\.(ico|jpg|png|svg)$/
```
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
During build, there's no need to start N workers for type checking and
linting, because there's no concurrency at all for these tasks (both
TypeScript and ESLint are checking all files globally).
During my test of `next build` for a small size project of 5 pages, this
change reduces the peak memory usage by 545MB (as each worker holds a
huge dependency chain). Before (there are too many worker threads
initiated):
<img width="1278" alt="before"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3676859/217116925-5594a45c-f1bb-4d11-8699-f6fe12ce7ee5.png">
After:
<img width="1189" alt="CleanShot-2023-02-07-WfQTnB1D@2x"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3676859/217116940-a08a256e-b80d-4836-8b97-2837c845435e.png">
It improves the CPU usage as well.
In the future we can spin up multiple workers and assign sub-task for
each, but that only makes sense when the number of pages is large.
NEXT-470
It seems this was broken when we changed the source folder.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`]
- [ ] (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Follow-up to #45555. This uses the same handling of mutable for
serverPatchReducer and refreshReducer.
Fixes NEXT-213
Ensures scroll position is still applied when calling `router.push()`
and `router.refresh()` in a single transition:
```tsx
startTransition(() => {
router.push('/dashboard')
router.refresh()
})
```
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Kaifer <jan@kaifer.cz>
Noticed while testing across CI environments that the `test-pack` handling is not-concurrent or cache safe so this removes it from being used by default and moves it behind a flag to allow further investigating later.
In CI if `test-pack` is called at the same time due to multiple concurrency it can cause the resulted archive to be corrupted so may require a form of lock to resolve in CI although locally re-using the same archive name/path isn't safe with pnpm as it won't bust the store cache and continue to leverage previous cache.
## Issue
To address the problem that we introduced in 13.0.7 (#42589) where we thought we could use same implementation `next/dynamic` for both `pages/` and `app/` directory. But it turns out it leads to many problems, such as:
* SSR preloading could miss the content, especially with nested dynamic calls
* Closes#45213
* Introducing suspense boundary into `next/dynamic` with extra wrapped `<Suspense>` outside will lead to content is not resolevd during SSR
* Related #45151
* Closes#45099
* Unexpected hydration errors for suspense boundaries. Though react removed this error but the 18.3 is not out yet.
* Closes#44083
* Closes#45246
## Solution
Separate the dynamic implementation for `app/` dir and `pages/`.
For `app/` dir we can encourage users to:
* Directly use `React.lazy` + `Suspense` for SSR'd content, and `next/dynamic`
* For non SSR components since it requires some internal integeration with next.js.
For `pages/` dir we still keep the original implementation
If you want to use `<Suspense>` with dynamic `fallback` value, use `React.lazy` + `Suspense` directly instead of picking up `next/dynamic`
* Closes#45116
This will solve various issue before react 18.3 is out and let users still progressively upgrade to new versions of next.js.
## Bug Fix
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Bug
- [x] Fixes#42419
---
This PR checks to see if the VSCode setting for `typescript.tsdk` has already been set, and avoids overwriting if so. This is needed for Yarn Berry PNP (and likely other uses) that do not use `./node_modules/typescript/lib` as the path for the Typescript SDK.
